Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8915539" data-attributes="member: 683408">Pretty clear?Tell us all where in the post you see it.Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly.Here&#039;s the post:[ATTACH=full]69586[/ATTACH]Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don&#039;t believe the links and quotes I&#039;ve provided multiple times.More repetition, no proof.The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth.I said two wires touching are not &quot;bridged&quot;.I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power.I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs.I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn&#039;t make multiple outputs from those mono wires.I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp.Shall I continue?If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me.It only serves to make you look dumber.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8915539, member: 683408"] Pretty clear? Tell us all where in the post you see it. Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly. Here's the post: [ATTACH type="full" width="284px" alt="IMG_7858.jpeg"]69586[/ATTACH] Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times. More repetition, no proof. The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth. I said two wires touching are not "bridged". I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power. I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs. I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn't make multiple outputs from those mono wires. I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp. Shall I continue? If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me. It only serves to make you look dumber. [/QUOTE]

Verification