Current events discussion

So, now you're saying he was convicted as a ******? Why can't you make up your mind.
Nope, never did.
Instead of you and Deeznuts repeating it over and over in an attempt to make it a truth, why not just show the proof instead?

Just give us all the post number, or a screenshot. Take a helluva lot less effort than all of your bullshit typing.
You remind me of those whacked out dems who say gender is not determined by physical appearances, but yet, they have to change their appearance to feel more like a certain gender.
You sound like all those uneducated redneck Republicans who have no idea that gender is a social construct.

It's like lack of education is a badge of honor amongst you people.
 
Last edited:
PBS.. Disgusting criminals.. They put a child predator ****** on a kids educational program, Targeted
for children ages 3-8 years old...

THIS IS WHERE ROBS GETS HIS NEWS??

You're worried about what's on TV, but you elect a racist, ******, ****** predator, 34x convicted felon, pathological liar, to the highest office in the US.

Nice priorities.
 
Well, if you actually read the entire context, you will see that Bill Clinton proved Trump was right about what he said.

I already quoted it, but to help you out, it was your post, # 26,681. Pretty clear you said the courts convicted him as a ******.
Pretty clear?
Tell us all where in the post you see it.
Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly.
Here's the post:
IMG_7858.jpeg



Again, I'm waiting for proof that he's a racist.
Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times.

For starters, you said he was a convicted ****** and a racist. You also stated Trump said Epstein is his best friend. You also said mono amps with dual outputs does not have those outputs internally bridged. Shall I continue, or are you going to show me proof that these are facts?
More repetition, no proof.
The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth.

I said two wires touching are not "bridged".
I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power.
I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs.
I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn't make multiple outputs from those mono wires.
I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp.
Shall I continue?

If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me.
It only serves to make you look dumber.
 
Pretty clear?
Tell us all where in the post you see it.
Or maybe lay off the hooch, so you can see clearly.
Here's the post:
View attachment 69586



Go look at the court case yourself. You obviously don't believe the links and quotes I've provided multiple times.


More repetition, no proof.
The staple of the right wing: Lie until it becomes a truth.

I said two wires touching are not "bridged".
I said a monoblock car amp cannot be bridged to itself to make more power.
I said a mono op amp cannot have multiple outputs.
I said connecting mono speaker leads to a terminal block doesn't make multiple outputs from those mono wires.
I said there are no circuit symbols that show multiple outputs from a mono amp.
Shall I continue?

If your memory is this shitty, you should stop relying on it to claim things about me.
It only serves to make you look dumber.
It's a good thing this guy is ignoring me.

A mono OP Amp has two outputs. A Positive and A Negative. Mono meaning one channel not one output. Poor kid, still arguing.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,704
Views
443,778
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top