So you admit to complaining that the Dems had a decade to "fix" something, while admitting the "decade" timeline is a fabrication to fit a narrative.How could possibly be so stupid to require a step by step break down? Over a decade would obviously refers to the fact the ACA credits are over a decade old. During that time period, there were shorter time periods where the Dems had varying degrees of control in DC. That shouid be obvious to anybody and i would assume that somebody who posts daily in politics thread knows that.
The REAL timeline is as follows:
Trump claimed he was going to "fix" (repeal and replace) the ACA the first time he was in office, but only made things worse. Had he repealed it, there was no plan to replace it with something better.
He is doing so again this time in office, and we're seeing headlines like this:
MAGA winning?
No one misrepresented what you said. You VERY clearly stated that team blue had "a decade" to fix the HC issue in the US. I VERY clearly said that team blue controlled the gov't for FAR less than a decade IN the past decade.So the real questions are: Why did you choose to misrepresent what i said? Why do you feel compelled to create arguments from a simple statement of fact? Do younthink you've accomplished something when you do silly shyt like this?
If the "a decade" comment was a misrepresentation, then it was you misrepresenting your own thoughts.
So, clear it up for us/me: Explain why you really meant with your complaint that team blue had a decade to fix the HC issue, in light of the actual time frame team blue was in control.
If you want, contrast it with the great plan that Trump had ready to implement, explain how it is better, and why we haven't adopted it.
Last edited:
