Look at you. Playing on words again. I am pretty sure I explained to you why they write the way they write so that non medically trained people can get a general understanding of what they are talking about. The literature doesn't have to be medically accurate for the laymen.
Look at you, still defending the stupid mistake you made years ago. Still unable to admit you fucked up.
The "medial literature". You mean medical textbooks used by medical students? The medical students learning to be doctors, nurses, anaesthitists, surgeons, etc, at Universities around the world?
They use the word "in" for those "laymen" learning how to put your body back together after you wreck your friend's motorcycle, because they want the "laymen" students to be able to understand what the professors are talking about?
OK. So based on your extensive study of human anatomy in Essentials of Biology by Sylvia Mader Volume 12, what IS the proper medical science term that they substituted the word "in" for, when saying that nerves are IN bones?
For example, in Anatomy and Physiology (ISBN-10 938168135), used by med students, they say
"evidence shows that nerves within bones are crucial to bone regeneration after a fracture".
Why would they use a term for the dumb "laymen" like "within", in a medical text for medical students?
WHY would they use "in", "into" and "interior" (terms apparently for the "laymen" to easily understand), in a resource that is used by pretty much every medical professional in the US: Gray's Anatomy?
"Nerves are distributed freely to the periosteum, and accompany the nutrient arteries
into the
interior of the bone. They are said by Kölliker to be most numerous
in the articular extremities of the long bones,
in the vertebræ, and
in the larger flat bones."