Here is your problem. You think because someone says lowest in 30 years that it is some kind of spectacular thing. Again, you and your dad Rob need to look at the context. Lower than what? What's the comparison? Here is a non literal example... for the last 30 years robberies in DC have been over 2,500 a day. Today the number is 2,250... the lowest crime rate in 30 years.
You liberals never question your sources so you see 30 year low and Trump is scum.
Funny that when it's an argument against facts, you pull; the "you think because someone says", or some variant that we simply accept hearsay on what happened in history, instead of verifiable facts.
Meanwhile, Demented Diapered Donnie TELLS you that foreign business will pay tariffs on goods WE import, and you accept it (in full disregard of import tax and tariff law) as fact.
Demented Diapered Donnie TELLS you that crime in DC (which was the lowest in 30 years in 2024) is at an "emergecny level" so he can take it over militarily, and you accept it as fact.
Demented Diapered Donnie TELLS you he built a 500 mile wall and immigration immediately stopped, and you accept it (in spite of all proof to the contrary) as fact.
Demented Diapered Donnie TELLS you he will bring down the cost of living (that you've been crying about for years) from day one, and you accept it as fact. And then 8 months later when he has failed, you defend his lies as something all candidates do, and we should never expect a POTUS to deliver on a promise.
"Lower than what?" ? Lower than the 30 years prior to 2024.
Violent crime in DC hit its lowest point in the past 30 years in 2024.
"Today the number is 2,250... the lowest crime rate in 30 years." - Thxone
If that's the case, then why is Trump declaring it an "emergency" that he needs to militarize DC LE for?
Why wasn't it an "emergency" when he was POTUS the first time, and crime was increasing?
Was he too busy having Twitter wars with Hollywood to notice?