Current events discussion

[Old_Slapper]

View attachment 62453

oh yaaaaa!!! I'll take it!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Argue, argue, argue. Right, Hornady as no experience with ammo. man, stfu.

Tell me why you would load a 5.56 for a .223 chamber dumbass. As far as "what spec", are you stupid or just plain dumb. Both 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington have their own load specs. Seriously, **** off already you troll.

Maybe you got a better deal on a bunch of 5.56 cases (US military seconds or surplus). Maybe as a reloader you prefer the thicker brass of the 5.56, since you'll be using them over and over.
Maybe you own a 5.56 AND a .223 rifle, and want to just have one big can of brass, and load them differently. Maybe you want to load them identically and shoot the same ammo from both guns. Maybe you got a free batch of 5.56 cases from a friend who no longer shoots.

The "why" is irrelevant. The FACT is that you can load 5.56 brass for lower pressure and shoot it all day long in a .223 rifle.
No matter how much that fact upsets you, it will not change.

One last attempt not that he will ever see the light or that any argument will be conceded against a Trump supporter but here it goes one last time.

Measurements, not the same.

View attachment 62459

when loaded with a powder load of (TAC brand powder) 27.5 in each of the two different cartridges the pressure will be higher in the 5.56 NATO because of the INNER dimensions of the case are smaller. Same load packed in a smaller space = HIGHER PRESSURE.

Yes. And you completely move or ignore the goalpost where I specifically say a cartridge loaded to give 3,000FPS of velocity from each round,


So let me ask this question: When I stated in the very beginning that it was a .223 that was used in the attempt, WHY did you go off on this whole tangent about it being 5.56?
What did you THINK it mattered, other than to be another failed attempt to prove me wrong about something?

And why are you refusing to answer on the differences between the same round fired from a 5.56 cartridge at 3,000FPS and one fired from a .223 cartridge at 3,000FPS?
Which one will do more damage at 150 yards?

It's physics PLUS math, so you might be totally lost at this point.

 

[Old_Slapper]

View attachment 62456

You forgot to add Greenland and the Panama Canal. LOL....

 

[Old_Slapper]

I'll tell you what Slapper: If the argument against every fact that I post here is going to be that it's "fake news", or "faked statistics", or "faked history" dating back up to 3/4 of a century, then there's no ******* way I'm going to believe a 78 year old man lost a chunk of his ear to a bullet, and that chunk miraculously grew back and healed without a trace of injury in a few weeks.

Pardon the run-on paragraph.

With all due respect, Rob, I have not seen any proof to support your claim. The photos you showed, proved my claims. The hole was only 2cm, according to the FBI. And again, the ear heals miraculously fast. This is due to the amount of blood flow there is in the ear. The Photo you provided, showed a jagged edged ear, where before, you can see is ear was smooth.

Again, I take it that you are now admitting that Biden, Kamala, and many other democrat leaders provide false reports. Remember, they all admit he was shot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

With all due respect, Rob, I have not seen any proof to support your claim. The photos you showed, proved my claims. The hole was only 2cm, according to the FBI. And again, the ear heals miraculously fast. This is due to the amount of blood flow there is in the ear. The Photo you provided, showed a jagged edged ear, where before, you can see is ear was smooth.

Again, I take it that you are now admitting that Biden, Kamala, and many other democrat leaders provide false reports. Remember, they all admit he was shot.

You realize that a 2cm "hole" (as you describe it) in his lobe (as Trump said) is over 3/4" of an inch, yes?
The diameter of a US dime is smaller than 3/4 of an inch.

A 2cm hole in his lobe completely healed without surgery, and without a trace of injury in a few weeks would be beyond miraculous.
It would be like he was a bamboo tree, not a human.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

The hole was only 2cm

It wasn't a hole it was a small piece from the edge where the bullet grazed him

Saying hole only let's Rob continue his lie...

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Let Cali burn

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Cut Fire Budget by Nearly $20 Million

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) cut nearly $20 million from the city's budget for fire services for the current fiscal year.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

The eyes Chico, they never lie.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Let Cali burn

This may explain why lol

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Maybe you got a better deal on a bunch of 5.56 cases (US military seconds or surplus). Maybe as a reloader you prefer the thicker brass of the 5.56, since you'll be using them over and over.
Maybe you own a 5.56 AND a .223 rifle, and want to just have one big can of brass, and load them differently. Maybe you want to load them identically and shoot the same ammo from both guns. Maybe you got a free batch of 5.56 cases from a friend who no longer shoots.

The "why" is irrelevant. The FACT is that you can load 5.56 brass for lower pressure and shoot it all day long in a .223 rifle.
No matter how much that fact upsets you, it will not change.


Yes. And you completely move or ignore the goalpost where I specifically say a cartridge loaded to give 3,000FPS of velocity from each round,


So let me ask this question: When I stated in the very beginning that it was a .223 that was used in the attempt, WHY did you go off on this whole tangent about it being 5.56?
What did you THINK it mattered, other than to be another failed attempt to prove me wrong about something?

And why are you refusing to answer on the differences between the same round fired from a 5.56 cartridge at 3,000FPS and one fired from a .223 cartridge at 3,000FPS?
Which one will do more damage at 150 yards?

It's physics PLUS math, so you might be totally lost at this point.

I was sitting here laughing with my dad as he told stories of the M-16 5.56 he used to shoot, how was an expert marksman as well as being an MSG in the Army. He also knows they are two different cartridges. On top of my own research and my dad's actual experience with said ammunition I no longer care to engage you in this conversation as you acquire information to argue with on the fly.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If's and maybe's. That's all Rob has when he is wrong. Never "you're right" or "I am wrong"... just roll with being an ******* never admitting anything. Just because you don't admit it doesn't mean you weren't wrong. Or maybe that is just how the left thinks.


I think Canada and Mexico SHOULD be folded into America. I have traveled to neither place but would like to. I'd like to see Mexico without my head being removed or Niagara Falls from the Canadian side without a Moose dry humping my sexy backside. I'm not sure how they will like being called American Moose though.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

They worried about if this effect the mating calls of the transsexual blue footed booby bird.