Current events discussion

Not to mention you ignoring post number 7514 where I posted the dimensions of both cases and the 5.56 NATO is indeed different. Why do you insist on butting heads Rob? You are wrong. Trump got shot, the two rounds are not the same. Just stop already.
So, you are arguing against the video that YOU posted as evidence.

Same stupid shit you pulled when you posted medical journal pics of nerves in bones, to prove there are no nerves in bones.

You should pick evidence that proves you right, instead of wrong. It'd make more sense for your argument.

Your evidence looked something like this:
1736309632396.png


"identical for all intents and purposes"
 
Last edited:
So I talked my coworkers who are long time pewpew hobbyists if the 5.56 and .223 interchangeable? They basically said it’s “Kiinda” the 556 can use the 223 BUT using 223 in the 553 can work they highly suggest not to because the chamber and barrel weren’t designed to hold the pressure. They would never use it in their personal equipment. Just because you can doesn't mean you should tho… so yeah @ThxOne
 
Last edited:
I'll tell you what Slapper: If the argument against every fact that I post here is going to be that it's "fake news", or "faked statistics", or "faked history" dating back up to 3/4 of a century, then there's no ******* way I'm going to believe a 78 year old man lost a chunk of his ear to a bullet
It's all a conspiracy pushed by government and mainstream media...
 
Repetition doesn't make truth, no matter how hard you try.
Not that Hornady has any experience with ammo, but this is what they have to say about it: "the fact that a 5.56 NATO chamber has a .125” longer throat. This allows approximately one more grain of powder to be loaded into a 5.56 NATO cartridge; this is what gives it higher performance than its 223 Remington cousin"

Maybe you should contact them and let them know the error of their ways.
Perhaps they'd hire you as their in-house expert advisor.

"Loaded to spec". What is the "spec" load for a 5.56 intended to be used in a rifle chambered for .223 ?
Argue, argue, argue. Right, Hornady as no experience with ammo. man, stfu.

Tell me why you would load a 5.56 for a .223 chamber dumbass. As far as "what spec", are you stupid or just plain dumb. Both 5.56 NATO and .223 Remington have their own load specs. Seriously, **** off already you troll.
 
Last edited:
So, you are arguing against the video that YOU posted as evidence.

Same stupid shit you pulled when you posted medical journal pics of nerves in bones, to prove there are no nerves in bones.

You should pick evidence that proves you right, instead of wrong. It'd make more sense for your argument.

Your evidence looked something like this:
View attachment 62454

"identical for all intents and purposes"
Argue, argue, argue.
 
I'll tell you what Slapper: If the argument against every fact that I post here is going to be that it's "fake news", or "faked statistics", or "faked history" dating back up to 3/4 of a century, then there's no ******* way I'm going to believe a 78 year old man lost a chunk of his ear to a bullet, and that chunk miraculously grew back and healed without a trace of injury in a few weeks.

Pardon the run-on paragraph.
Prove it was a chunk. Back it up with verifiable medical evidence that it was a chunk Rob.
 
So, you are arguing against the video that YOU posted as evidence.

Same stupid shit you pulled when you posted medical journal pics of nerves in bones, to prove there are no nerves in bones.

You should pick evidence that proves you right, instead of wrong. It'd make more sense for your argument.

Your evidence looked something like this:
View attachment 62454

"identical for all intents and purposes"
Cherry pick 6 words and you think you are right and continue to argue like you are the smartest man alive. Moron.
 
One last attempt not that he will ever see the light or that any argument will be conceded against a Trump supporter but here it goes one last time.

Measurements, not the same.

223-Remington-cartridge-and-chamber-768x994.jpg


when loaded with a powder load of (TAC brand powder) 27.5 in each of the two different cartridges the pressure will be higher in the 5.56 NATO because of the INNER dimensions of the case are smaller. Same load packed in a smaller space = HIGHER PRESSURE.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,848
Views
463,739
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top