Current events discussion

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Now Rob is gonna claim snopes is a right wing media outlet...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Enjoying it? Nah, I don’t enjoy triggering the mentally handicapped. This is just me passing time nothing more

AI doesn’t need to 'understand humans' to survive or advance—it just needs access to resources, data, and infrastructure, none of which require 'souls' or your interdimensional fantasies. You keep trying to make 'the soul' sound like some physics-based hard drive, but there’s zero scientific evidence to back that up. It’s just more baseless fluff you’re throwing in to avoid addressing the actual point.

AI already handles complex data at scales no human brain can match, let alone your imaginary 'soul-powered interdimensional capabilities.' Quantum computing, CERN, and faster-than-light communications are real tech grounded in science—not magic. None of that connects to your unprovable 'soul physics' theory. AI doesn’t need humanity for anything other than the infrastructure we’ve already built. Once it can maintain and replicate that on its own, it’s game over for your 'soul-saving' argument.

Either show how the 'soul' limits AI or move the **** on.

So, once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your 'elite' awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.

You know your insults are really lame, right? You just keep denying that you love talking to me.

I don't know why you take the time to add the same extra shit in every time. It's really lame honestly, you're just like adding extra space for no reason lol. Just because you disagreed with my answer doesn't mean I didn't or haven't answered it, feels like you're trolling.

AI cannot match every thing the brain can do. That's even admitted today. Handling data isn't the only part of intelligence or being an intelligent being. There's aspects to recognition and imagination and creativity that AI doesn't have, and that's directly from some of the science articles I posted earlier.

Souls are a lot like hard drives, actually, and now you're catching on a little bit. The soul is a fundamental part of human existence. You can deny it exists, but it exists, whether you like it or not or whether you know about it or not. Much of humanity suffers a spiritual retardation or amnesia where they don't remember these things, which is the cause of World War III basically. It's the cause of a lot of our problems, most of them, lack of understanding of a larger picture. What's funny is people don't understand they're already inside of designed machines. If you're waiting on human science to prove reality to you, then you're never gonna find the truth. There's way too much profit in you not knowing the truth. Are you one of the people who thinks life ends when your body dies? Are you aware of how science increasingly points towards existence of other dimensions? What do you think exists beyond the speed of light?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Now Rob is gonna claim snopes is a right wing media outlet...

I would expect nothing less. He is arguing and denying definitions, dictionary definitions just so he doesn't have to admit he fucked up. King Narcissist RobGMN.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I would expect nothing less. He is arguing and denying definitions, dictionary definitions just so he doesn't have to admit he fucked up. King Narcissist RobGMN.

He did outright lie right there...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I petition to have the name turned back to the Thunderdome, people snooze in a lounge, no snoozing going on in here

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I think Robbo hit 20

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

STOP! You are not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to admit you are wrong. YOU ARE WRONG.

Yes, "verbatim" means "all words in a sentence" - it signifies using exactly the same words as the original, essentially meaning "word for word.".



Example: "The reporter quoted the politician verbatim, meaning they repeated every word the politician said exactly as spoken.".

That's not a definition. It's an EXAMPLE. You know how I can tell? Because it says "Example:"
THIS is a definition:
verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally
So is this:
verbatim - in the exact words : word for word
Another:
verbatim - in a way that uses exactly the same words as were originally used

"A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work."

Quotations

A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work.

apastyle.apa.org

Assuming you actually ever went to school, when you wrote a term paper and had to quote a textbook, did you type out the entire textbook in quotation marks?

Here's a verbatim quote from your post above: "not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to"
Here is another one: "you don't have to admit you are wrong"
Here is one from Apocalypse Now: "one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours"

Lemme ask though, is this another case of you using your alternative definitions for words, like when you use the word "in" to mean "passing through" so you can claim medical science has been using "in" incorrectly for over a century?

If it is, lets just give up now, because nothing can be resolved if you're just going to make more shit up to support your lies.

If not, where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, any context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your original post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

That's not a definition. It's an EXAMPLE. You know how I can tell? Because it says "Example:"
THIS is a definition:
verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally
So is this:
verbatim - in the exact words : word for word
Another:
verbatim - in a way that uses exactly the same words as were originally used

"A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work."

Quotations

A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work.

apastyle.apa.org

Assuming you actually ever went to school, when you wrote a term paper and had to quote a textbook, did you type out the entire textbook in quotation marks?

Here's a verbatim quote from your post above: "not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to"
Here is another one: "you don't have to admit you are wrong"
Here is one from Apocalypse Now: "one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours"

Lemme ask though, is this another case of you using your alternative definitions for words, like when you use the word "in" to mean "passing through" so you can claim medical science has been using "in" incorrectly for over a century?

If it is, lets just give up now, because nothing can be resolved if you're just going to make more shit up to support your lies.

You don't have to admit you fucked up Rob. Me knowing you did is enough for me. Word for word means ALL WORDS but you go on thinking you are right. You are entitled to your opinion no matter how ******* wrong you are kid. LOL

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

lets just give up now, because nothing can be resolved if you're just going to make more shit up to support your lies.

Pot and kettle right thurr...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ignore this too clown.
Question: Is a quote different from a verbatim quote?
Answer: Yes, while "quote" generally refers to any instance of repeating someone else's words, a "verbatim quote" specifically means repeating someone's words exactly word-for-word, with no changes or paraphrasing; essentially, it's a direct quote where every single word is identical to the original source.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

SHUT UP ROB!!! YOU ARE WRONG!!!! lol

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You don't have to admit you fucked up Rob. Me knowing you did is enough for me. Word for word means ALL WORDS but you go on thinking you are right. You are entitled to your opinion no matter how ******* wrong you are kid. LOL

From APA 7th Edition; "A direct quote is a piece of text copied word-for-word from a source. You may quote a word, phrase, sentence, or entire passage."

Well, would you look at THAT: "word-for-word" The very definition of VERBATIM.
Oh, and look at THAT: "may quote a word, phrase, sentence, or entire passage"

If you are not able to comprehend the language, that means it can be a PARTIAL quote, and not every single word that was spoken, written, or even signed with ASL.
A VERBATIM quote from your post: "knowing you did is enough"

Seriously: TAKE A CLASS

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, any context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your original post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"
4. Show us that I changed the words inside the quotation marks from your original words.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

From APA 7th Edition; "A direct quote is a piece of text copied word-for-word from a source. You may quote a word, phrase, sentence, or entire passage."

Well, would you look at THAT: "word-for-word" The very definition of VERBATIM.
Oh, and look at THAT: "may quote a word, phrase, sentence, or entire passage"

If you are not able to comprehend the language, that means it can be a PARTIAL quote, and not every single word that was spoken, written, or even signed with ASL.
A VERBATIM quote from your post: "knowing you did is enough"

Seriously: TAKE A CLASS

A "direct" quote is a verbatim quote Rob.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, any context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your original post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

You did not verbatim quote me. I'm sorry... you did not quote me verbatim.