Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8886230" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>That's not a definition. It's an EXAMPLE. You know how I can tell? Because it says "Example:"</p><p>THIS is a definition:</p><p><em>verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally</em></p><p>So is this:</p><p><em>verbatim - in the <a href="https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exact#h2" target="_blank">exact</a> words <strong>: </strong>word for word</em></p><p>Another:</p><p><em>verbatim - in a way that uses <a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/exactly" target="_blank">exactly</a> the same words as were <a href="https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/originally" target="_blank">originally</a> used</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>"A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work."</em></p><p><em>[URL unfurl="true"]https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/quotations[/URL]</em></p><p>Assuming you actually ever went to school, when you wrote a term paper and had to quote a textbook, did you type out the entire textbook in quotation marks?</p><p></p><p>Here's a <u>verbatim</u> quote from your post above:<em> "not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to"</em></p><p>Here is another one: <em>"you don't have to admit you are wrong"</em></p><p>Here is one from Apocalypse Now: <em>"one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours"</em></p><p></p><p>Lemme ask though, is this another case of you using your alternative definitions for words, like when you use the word "in" to mean "<em>passing through</em>" so you can claim medical science has been using "in" incorrectly for over a century?</p><p></p><p>If it is, lets just give up now, because nothing can be resolved if you're just going to make more shit up to support your lies.</p><p></p><p>If not, where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?</p><p>1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, any context for the quote.</p><p>2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your original post.</p><p>3. Show us how this is a "misquote"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8886230, member: 683408"] That's not a definition. It's an EXAMPLE. You know how I can tell? Because it says "Example:" THIS is a definition: [I]verbatim - in exactly the same words as were used originally[/I] So is this: [I]verbatim - in the [URL='https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exact#h2']exact[/URL] words [B]: [/B]word for word[/I] Another: [I]verbatim - in a way that uses [URL='https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/exactly']exactly[/URL] the same words as were [URL='https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/originally']originally[/URL] used "A direct quotation reproduces words verbatim from another work or from your own previously published work." [URL unfurl="true"]https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations/quotations[/URL][/I] Assuming you actually ever went to school, when you wrote a term paper and had to quote a textbook, did you type out the entire textbook in quotation marks? Here's a [U]verbatim[/U] quote from your post above:[I] "not going to ignore definitions just so you don't have to"[/I] Here is another one: [I]"you don't have to admit you are wrong"[/I] Here is one from Apocalypse Now: [I]"one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours"[/I] Lemme ask though, is this another case of you using your alternative definitions for words, like when you use the word "in" to mean "[I]passing through[/I]" so you can claim medical science has been using "in" incorrectly for over a century? If it is, lets just give up now, because nothing can be resolved if you're just going to make more shit up to support your lies. If not, where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above? 1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, any context for the quote. 2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your original post. 3. Show us how this is a "misquote" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list