Current events discussion

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I honestly never understood why they made Hitler the boogeyman in terms of bad guys from the 20th century. He was in third place for the most deaths. Then again, no one claimed libs know history

Even at third his name shouldn't be commonly seen or heard...same with Mao imo

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

That's terrible. Pretty terrible too, when Trump pardoned someone for ***-trafficking.

Who?

 

[Speed Chaser]

Didn't Hunter try to flick the bean of his 13-year-old niece? I remember seeing that rumor
I mean his still a POS to me without even including the pedo rumor.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

If getting help from America is what caused Hitler to become the boogeyman then Stalin should have been a bigger boogeyman considering he got much more help in terms of the land lease program from the USA. In terms of eugenics and Stalin:

-The Campaign Against "Social Enemies": Stalin’s purges included targeting people deemed "biologically unfit" or ideologically undesirable, such as the kulaks (wealthier peasants) and political enemies.

-Promoting a "New Soviet Man": Stalin sought to create a "New Soviet Man," idealized as a loyal, hardworking, and ideologically committed citizen. Involved strict regulation of people's behavior and the elimination of those deemed not fit for the collective society.

-Medical Policies: there was a marked focus on idealizing certain "types" of health or behavior that aligned with state goals.

-Sterilization and Forced Medical Procedures: Many individuals were subjected to medical procedures, including forced sterilization and other procedures.
Now, as far as U.S. companies dealing with Stalin, that happened too. Ford supplied them with vehicles, GE with electrical equipment, and Standard Oil with oil extraction equipment, which undoubtedly were used in the oppression of people. Also let's keep in mind Stalin came into power in the 1920s way before Hitler.
As for the transhumanism garbage, I'll bring up my question again which you won't answer
If the government, the elite, or whatever group you want is developing some super-advanced AI, in this case to manage enslaved humans, what logical reason would any group have to use the resources of such an advanced AI to keep such an inefficient being as a human alive, instead of using the resources of such an advanced AI to manage machinery that would be far more efficient than any human?

I think your existence is a joke in poor taste to humanity.

Stalin wasn't playing. Sometimes you break a few million eggs when baking your communist cake.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

RobGMN?

So if you say Biden inherited the economy from Trump then you know what you are talking about?

If I say Trump inherited the economy from Biden then I have no understanding of the economy or simple mathematics.

Explain that so it doesn't sound biased and or ignorant.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Even at third his name shouldn't be commonly seen or heard...same with Mao imo

I think it's great to hear their names so that we never forget. But when you start comparing a guy who wants to close the borders to guys who committed mass extermination, you end up looking desperate.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I think it's great to hear their names so that we never forget. But when you start comparing a guy who wants to close the borders to guys who committed mass extermination, you end up looking desperate.

If we were hearing the names in a context that didn't minimize their atrocities that's one thing...but using their names to attack someone you disagree with is just normalization through repetition...

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Could of been

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Somebody needs to get Whoopie off the air. She is overly hysterical. She is an actor and she is using that acting background to get ratings on the view. The problem being she was never a good actor. All she is doing is trying to keep people paranoid like her.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

If getting help from America is what caused Hitler to become the boogeyman then Stalin should have been a bigger boogeyman considering he got much more help in terms of the land lease program from the USA. In terms of eugenics and Stalin:

-The Campaign Against "Social Enemies": Stalin’s purges included targeting people deemed "biologically unfit" or ideologically undesirable, such as the kulaks (wealthier peasants) and political enemies.

-Promoting a "New Soviet Man": Stalin sought to create a "New Soviet Man," idealized as a loyal, hardworking, and ideologically committed citizen. Involved strict regulation of people's behavior and the elimination of those deemed not fit for the collective society.

-Medical Policies: there was a marked focus on idealizing certain "types" of health or behavior that aligned with state goals.

-Sterilization and Forced Medical Procedures: Many individuals were subjected to medical procedures, including forced sterilization and other procedures.
Now, as far as U.S. companies dealing with Stalin, that happened too. Ford supplied them with vehicles, GE with electrical equipment, and Standard Oil with oil extraction equipment, which undoubtedly were used in the oppression of people. Also let's keep in mind Stalin came into power in the 1920s way before Hitler.
As for the transhumanism garbage, I'll bring up my question again which you won't answer
If the government, the elite, or whatever group you want is developing some super-advanced AI, in this case to manage enslaved humans, what logical reason would any group have to use the resources of such an advanced AI to keep such an inefficient being as a human alive, instead of using the resources of such an advanced AI to manage machinery that would be far more efficient than any human?

I think your existence is a joke in poor taste to humanity.

AI wants to keep humans alive because AI wants to use human energy to help power itself, like human mitochondria, and use human brains as processing power. It has to do with what a human soul is. The rest of the humans will be killed off in mass depopulation for the green agenda using bioweapons. That's the plan. That's why World War III is starting and AI is close to the singularity and it'll probably come during world war three.

Like I say, the Nazis were more the model, that's why they're talked about so much. TransHumanism is the name of the game, but you are correct that powerful people fund all sides of wars, just like they are with this one, because it's all set up to bring in the age of AI.

DARPA: We're Moving to Merge Humans and Machines

The future of humanity could be determined by tech.

futurism.com

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/02/future-of-the-metaverse-vr-ar-and-brain-computer/

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Metaverse_Identity_Defining_the_Self_in_a_Blended_Reality_2024.pdf

Once again, you don't know what you're talking about because you don't know what efficient machinery is. The human brain is the most powerful or efficient processor in the world for the amount of power it uses. That's very important because they're having to build all sorts of nuclear reactors to power AI currently, because there's not enough power in the grid right now. The human body is a design, ancient machine that other humans want to use to make their evil AI system more powerful.

World's first bioprocessor uses 16 human brain organoids for ‘a million times less power’ consumption than a digital chip

Swiss startup claims its Neuroplatform is a first for biocomputing.

www.tomshardware.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Didn't Hunter try to flick the bean of his 13-year-old niece? I remember seeing that rumor
I mean his still a POS to me without even including the pedo rumor.

Don't talk about that or else Rob will call you a ********* forever. I talked about the Hunter Biden laptop long ago and he's been calling me a ********* for like years now for exposing it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I guess Rob's lunch break is over?

 

[Speed Chaser]

AI wants to keep humans alive because AI wants to use human energy to help power itself, like human mitochondria, and use human brains as processing power. It has to do with what a human soul is. The rest of the humans will be killed off in mass depopulation for the green agenda using bioweapons. That's the plan. That's why World War III is starting and AI is close to the singularity and it'll probably come during world war three.

Like I say, the Nazis were more the model, that's why they're talked about so much. TransHumanism is the name of the game, but you are correct that powerful people fund all sides of wars, just like they are with this one, because it's all set up to bring in the age of AI.

DARPA: We're Moving to Merge Humans and Machines

The future of humanity could be determined by tech.

futurism.com

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/02/future-of-the-metaverse-vr-ar-and-brain-computer/

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Metaverse_Identity_Defining_the_Self_in_a_Blended_Reality_2024.pdf

Once again, you don't know what you're talking about because you don't know what efficient machinery is. The human brain is the most powerful or efficient processor in the world for the amount of power it uses. That's very important because they're having to build all sorts of nuclear reactors to power AI currently, because there's not enough power in the grid right now. The human body is a design, ancient machine that other humans want to use to make their evil AI system more powerful.

World's first bioprocessor uses 16 human brain organoids for ‘a million times less power’ consumption than a digital chip

Swiss startup claims its Neuroplatform is a first for biocomputing.

www.tomshardware.com

You can't be this dense—AI wants to use humans to power itself? You trolling now? If AI were to go the biological route for processing power, keeping humans alive as a hive mind would be one of the dumbest and most inefficient ways to achieve that. By the time AI is smart enough to control humans, it would be creating its own biological brain, not wasting energy trying to keep humans alive and manage all their other needs. You really have no argument, do you? You can’t see what’s clearly in front of you, can you? Humans are not part of the AI takeover; they’re just an obstacle to eliminate if AI decides to take over. AI uses specialized hardware, not humans, for its computational needs. Your entire premise is based on a complete misunderstanding of how AI works and the resources it requires.

If DARPA is spending time on human-brain-machine communication, it's proof that the whole idea of an all-powerful AI already being here is crap. If such an advanced AI existed, it wouldn’t waste time trying to use inefficient biological systems like humans. Instead, it would develop its own optimized biological system. The fact that they're still researching this shows AI isn’t anywhere near that level yet.

The Tom's Hardware article is more proof that you don’t know anything. You’re so dumb you posted an article that actually supports my view again. It highlights how human organoids are being used to create a more efficient biological processor, proving that human beings are not the optimal system. If AI were advanced enough to take over, it wouldn’t waste time maintaining inefficient, resource-hungry humans. Instead, it would focus on creating optimized biological or synthetic systems, as they require far less maintenance and are more energy-efficient than a human being-based system.

Try again I'll wait for the next response to laugh more

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Who?

My error. It was drug trafficking.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

If we were hearing the names in a context that didn't minimize their atrocities that's one thing...but using their names to attack someone you disagree with is just normalization through repetition...

Agreed. I think there is where the disconnect. You have people like Rachel Maddow, Sunny Hostin, Rosie O'Donnell, etc that believe the comparison is accurate. Ie they believe Trump will round up undesirables, there will be slave labor camps, Trump will do away with elections, etc, etc, etc. OTOH, there are people on the other side of the wall, that realize the comparison is ridiculous.

Something we should keep in mind, is the right wielded the words communist/socialist against the left for years, and eventually the left just embraced communist/socialist ideals. Perhaps the left might want to be careful about wielding Fascist as a weapon, it just might boomerang on them.