Current events discussion

You have this weird impression that you get to agree or disagree with mathematical fact, history, medical fact, federal regulation, state statute, Constitutional law, and a host of other irrefutable things.
Sorry, but that's not how reality works. None of those things are affected by your agreeance, or lack thereof.
These are just your opinions. You in no way have a clue what I think or why I think it. Your life is literally a series of assumptions.
Can you share where I said that the stock market health is the only measure of the economy?
I'm sure I could lest you go back and remove or alter the post that would prove me right. However, I don't give a shit.
More whining about the thread existing, yet you and your TSS can't manage to leave it.
You sit here and pretend every failure of the Administration is a success.
Pretty damn weird.
Yeah, that's what it is. lol
 
DOGE violates the FOIA.
But it's OK because they are "finding fraud". Right?

And, why did Trump try to get DOGE records to be considered "presidential", which would prevent public viewing until 2034?
What do they have to hide?

1745277970094.png
 
These are just your opinions. You in no way have a clue what I think or why I think it. Your life is literally a series of assumptions.
You constantly post in this thread what you think.
Or is it all a bunch of lies?
"average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means" -Thxone
I'm sure I could lest you go back and remove or alter the post that would prove me right. However, I don't give a shit.
Would have been less words to say you can't do it. And even that wouldn't have been necessary, as we already knew.
Yeah, that's what it is. lol
 
Last edited:
DOGE violates the FOIA.
But it's OK because they are "finding fraud". Right?

And, why did Trump try to get DOGE records to be considered "presidential", which would prevent public viewing until 2034?
What do they have to hide?

View attachment 64778
Let the conspiracy theories fly!!!
 
You constantly post in this thread what you think.
Or is it all a bunch of lies?
You'd never know... all you can do is assume.
"average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means" -Thxone
"What amp are you using? Car amps don't just have "double outputs" that are wired internally unless they are Pyramid crap type of equipment.
Multiple outputs means multiple channels. Leaving them unused means you have amplifier power not being used." - RobGMN

Would have been less words to say you can't do it. And even that wouldn't have been necessary, as we already knew.
You'd like to assume that huh?
 
You'd never know... all you can do is assume.
Assume what? That you are either telling the truth, or not? What's the third option?
"What amp are you using? Car amps don't just have "double outputs" that are wired internally unless they are Pyramid crap type of equipment.
Multiple outputs means multiple channels. Leaving them unused means you have amplifier power not being used." - RobGMN
100% accurate.
Bit if you'd like to show a circuit diagram of a mono amp with multiple outputs., I'm sure everyone here would be fascinated by it.
Do you happen to have one?
You'd like to assume that huh?
I think the people reading this thread are smart enough to know you can't deliver.
Let the conspiracy theories fly!!!
"Conspiracy theory"? No, the lawsuits are VERY real.
 
Last edited:
Assume what? That you are either telling the truth, or not? What's the third option?
Well you seem to know everything, why don't YOU tell me?
100% accurate.
Your statement was 100% bullshit. That is why everyone laughed about it.
Bit if you'd like to show a circuit diagram of a mono amp with multiple outputs., I'm sure everyone here would be fascinated by it.
Do you happen to have one?
No need, there are PLENTY of mono car audio subwoofer amps that have MULTIPLE outputs. When or if you ever decide to stop acting like a princess and hop on board with the terminology the rest of the car audio world uses then perhaps you can stfu about it. Until then, you're a moron.
I think the people reading this thread are smart enough to know you can't deliver.
I am sure everyone knows your game. You have been doing this since you joined the site Rob.
"Conspiracy theory"? No, the lawsuits are VERY real.
Mhmm. Like you thinking Trump is a convicted ****** real or just the far left wishing it were real?
 
Well you seem to know everything, why don't YOU tell me?

Your statement was 100% bullshit. That is why everyone laughed about it.
Ahhh, "trust me bro"?
Sorry, but I don't trust you.
Go ahead and share the scheatic that shows a mono amp with multiple outputs (known as "channels" in audio parlance).
Maybe do it in your next post, so you don't "forget".
No need, there are PLENTY of mono car audio subwoofer amps that have MULTIPLE outputs. When or if you ever decide to stop acting like a princess and hop on board with the terminology the rest of the car audio world uses then perhaps you can stfu about it. Until then, you're a moron.
No woriies. just go ahead and post that schematic to prove what you believe to be true.
I am sure everyone knows your game. You have been doing this since you joined the site Rob.
Doing what? Making posts that are relevant to the thread title?
Whoa, what a crazy concept! Maybe I should copyright it!
Mhmm. Like you thinking Trump is a convicted ****** real or just the far left wishing it were real?
You can deny the court papers all you want; it will NEVER change what is in them.
You can believe he'll win his appeal all you want. He won't, He lost that, too.
He's a ******. And you like rapists. You defend them often.

Here: Read it so you can deny it again, and look the fool again - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
 
Mother fucker, I didn't say trust me, nor did I infer it and I could care less if you believe or don't believe ANYthing I say.
Little one is getting triggered again, lol.

If you're going to say I'm wrong without any ability to prove it, then you are asking to be trusted in your evaluation. And I don't trust you. So I ask for proof.
Proof that you can't proffer.

Again, pointless to provide you with any facts, proofs or otherwise because you would NEVER accept anything that YOU didn't post as a fact, proof or otherwise so stop ******* asking for shit you will deny anyway.
Another move from your redundant playbook. Refuse to provide proof on the basis of your belief that proof will not be accepted. An unsupported belief, since you can't provide proof.
You are the one who refuses to speak with the same language everyone else uses and you do it so you can be a smart *** and argue. Case in point a MONO amp has one channel and CAN have multiple outputs. Why? Because outputs doesn't always mean CHANNELS you *******. Furthermore, they are DIFFERENT WORDS WITH DIFFERENT MEANINGS.
More of the "trust me bro" support of your claim. No thanks. A schematic would be just fine.
Got one?
Being a smart ***, condescending dick.
You like that word. how many times have you used it in a condescending manner? How many times have you claimed superiority in your "knowledge" of anatomy b/c you took classes in dirt sample analysis?

Remember when you proclaimed you were just as much an expert as the world's immunologists and virologists, because you got a degree in dirt samples? Now THAT was some funny stuff.
Listen moron, **** is a criminal offense. Trumps trial was a CIVIL trial. He was not convicted of ****. So, shut up.
Ahhhh, so if you don't read the court documents, then none of it is true.
Fred Ostrich, Esq. for the defense. "This is bullshit. The defense rests." HAHAHAHAHA
 
Last edited:
Little one is getting triggered again, lol.
Not at all, I am just talking down to how you deserve to be talked to.
If you're going to say I'm wrong without any ability to prove it, then you are asking to be trusted in your evaluation. And I don't trust you. So I ask for proof.
Proof that you can't proffer.
We ALL know. You demand everyone prove something to YOU. Again, who the **** are you?
Another move from your redundant playbook. Refuse to provide proof on the basis of your belief that proof will not be accepted. An unsupported belief, since you can't provide proof.
Damn right it has been added to the playbook. As many times as proof and facts have been given to you for you to completely ignore them or deny them. You don't deserve the effort of facts or proof.
More of the "trust me bro" support of your claim. No thanks. A schematic would be just fine.
Got one?
Again, none that YOU would accept and I really don't care. That is your game, to argue and deny.
You like that word. how many times have you used it in a condescending manner? How many times have you claimed superiority in your "knowledge" of anatomy b/c you took classes in dirt sample analysis?
It's a factual statement so go ahead, deny that you act like a condescending dick.
Remember when you proclaimed you were just as much an expert as the world's immunologists and virologists, because you got a degree in dirt samples? Now THAT was some funny stuff.
No, I don't actually because I never made that claim. I asked you a question and you aren't smart enough to answer it. That, is on you fella.
Ahhhh, so if you don't read the court documents, then none of it is true.
Fred Ostrich, Esq. for the defense. "This is bullshit. The defense rests." HAHAHAHAHA
I could not care less what bullshit the left is trying to come up with because they are all piss poor losers. A bunch of grown *** adults acting like kids who got their cell phones and screens taken away. ****'em all.
 
Ahhh, "wiggle room".
So, you think it's OK for this Administration to do illegal things in the name of "good"?

Violate the COTUS left and right, ignore the SCOTUS, break statutes. All forgivable.
When does it become NOT forgivable? When it affects YOU? Like all those Trumpers who are now being hurt and whining that they didn't know he'd hurt THEM?

View attachment 64776
View attachment 64777
And what illegalities has TrumpCo been involved in?
 
Are you trying to convince us it was all an AMAZING coincidence, or yourself?

You seem to be parroting the same thoughts. Ones that contradict every analysis of the events that happened.
What is the basis of your thoughts that it is all just a coincidence?

Do you think the precipitous drop in 2020 was just a market correction, and had nothing to do with the pandemic panic? Simply coincidence?
My thoughts contradict every analysis? Just so we have this straight, the S&P 500 PE ratios weren't out of whack compared to say 2019? The S&P 500 wasn't experiencing amazing year over year growth despite nothing to justify that growth - ie jobs, new industries, etc?
 
And what illegalities has TrumpCo been involved in?
Do you really need a list? Here are a few:

Agents of the Department of Government Efficiency engaged in a standoff that involved police when they accessed the U.S. Institute of Peace. Officials with the institute for weeks had insisted that the administration had no authority over it due to its independent, nonprofit status, but DOGE seized its headquarters and threatened those inside the building with prosecution if they did not vacate.

The Department of Education announced a reduction in force initiative that would diminish its staff by nearly 50%. In response, 20 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia sued Trump, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and the Education Department over violations of the separation of powers doctrine, the executive’s obligation to properly execute laws and the Administrative Procedure Act.

Trump issued an executive order directing the attorney general and other agency heads to suspend the security clearances, cease supplying provisions, review and terminate contracts, restrict access to government buildings and refrain from hiring individuals at Perkins Coie LLP.
... it violates the separation of powers doctrine and the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

The Office of Personnel Management directed agency leaders to begin terminating probationary employees and sent an email the following day further clarifying this policy. Several labor unions and organizations filed a lawsuit on Feb. 19 against the mass termination of probationary employees on the grounds that OPM’s directive violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the separation of powers doctrine.

The White House blocked Associated Press reporters from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other press pool events over the news organization’s stance on the Trump administration’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico. In response, The Associated Press filed a lawsuit on Feb. 21 against three White House officials arguing that the ban violates the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause and the news outlet’s First Amendment rights.

Trump signed an executive order that, among other things, called on agency heads to swiftly begin “large-scale reductions in force” across the federal government. Three Indigenous tribes and five Native Americans students filed a lawsuit against the secretary of the interior, the assistant secretary for Indian affairs and the director of the Bureau of Indian Education arguing that Trump’s order, and other actions taken by the administration, caused layoffs of BIE staffers and university educators and the restructuring of the bureau, leading to the degradation of educational services at various federally funded tribal schools and post-secondary institutions. The administration’s actions, the lawsuit alleges, were done without the consultation of the tribal nations and thus violated federal laws requiring tribal consultation. The lawsuit also argues that the BIE’s reductions in force and its restructuring violated the Administrative Procedure Act and tribal rights around education.

The federal judge who blocked the Trump administration’s federal funding freeze on Jan. 31 said the administration violated his temporary restraining order by continuing “to improperly freeze federal funds” and not resuming the “disbursement of appropriated federal funds.”

Russell Vought, the Trump-appointed acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, directed the agency to halt most of its work and closed its headquarters for the following week in an effort to essentially shutter the bureau. In response, the National Treasury Employees Union filed two lawsuits against Vought arguing that his directives are unlawful. The first lawsuit says Vought violated the separation of powers doctrine by “undermin[ing] Congress’s authority to set and fund the missions of the CFPB.” The second lawsuit says Vought violated the Privacy Act by allowing the Department of Government Efficiency to access CFPB employee records.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,958
Views
516,814
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top