At this point, you have wandered so far off the path to try and not be wrong, I have NO idea WTH you are even babbling about.Rob, if the US adds a person (agency) between them and China... they are by definition a middle man. This (Agency) as you called it is pointless. It is an extra step for the US government when importing for themselves. It would be like you ordering that bike you keep blabbing about but having some other guy go to the docks, pay the tariff, then allow you to get the bike. Pointless. You wouldn't do it so why would OUR government do it. But you are claiming they do. So, since you and I both know it is a waste of time and money I think it is one more thing for DOGE to fix.
Oh? So all we have to do is let a few days pass and you will be clueless to what you said? Really? I am saying the same thing to you I said when you originally made your statement about a Government Agency importing for the Government. You are claiming I wandered off the path when your last confused question is if I want DOGE to "fix" the stupid tariffs that Trump keeps ******* around with? If by "fix" you mean "eliminate", then I'm all for it."?At this point, you have wandered so far off the path to try and not be wrong, I have NO idea WTH you are even babbling about.
You can read the law yourself. it's in plain language that even a middle-schooler could understand.
- Import tariffs get paid by the IMPORTER. That's the law, not an "interpretation".
- If a government agency (such as DOD) imports a product, the DOD will pay an IMPORT tariff. That's the law, not an "interpretation".
- If the government agency contracts a middle man as an importing agent, then the middle man is the importer, and will pay the IMPORT tariffs. That's the law, not an "interpretation". They will pass that cost on to the DOD. That's just common sense.
- If Joe Citizen buys a product direct and has it shipped here from a foreign country, Joe Citizen is the IMPORTER. That's the law, not an "interpretation".
- When Joe Citizen's product arrives here, Joe will have to pay the tariff/tax/duty, if the product is subject to one. The product is out of the exporter's control, and the US has no recourse to collect ANY funds from said exporter. That's the law, not an "interpretation"
I really don't understand why you continue to argue that your beliefs supersede the written law.
You want DOGE to "fix" the stupid tariffs that Trump keeps ******* around with? If by "fix" you mean "eliminate", then I'm all for it.
This post is about as useless as your alleged job chasing food stamp abusers. All this is saying is that the entry was removed? Really? So editing isn't supposed to happen? Making corrections isn't supposed to happen? Mistakes?Hmmm, it seems that DOGE is fudging numbers.
Sounds like FRAUD to me.
View attachment 64769
"The Department of Government Efficiency’s website quietly removed nearly one billion dollars in what it claims to have “saved” through canceled contracts, grants or leases this past week.
In the latest example of altering figures on the agency’s website, staffers at DOGE seemingly updated its claimed savings overnight on Tuesday, erasing approximately $962 million, according to NOTUS.
The largest of the disappeared cuts made this week, identified using the Wayback Machine, appears to be a $1.1 billion contract with the Acacia Center for Justice. The group provided legal services for unaccompanied immigrant children who enter the U.S. DOGE initially claimed the termination would save $367 million, but now the contract isn’t listed at all."
A BILLION dollar "edit"?This post is about as useless as your alleged job chasing food stamp abusers. All this is saying is that the entry was removed? Really? So editing isn't supposed to happen? Making corrections isn't supposed to happen? Mistakes?
How about some real reporting with context. Ask questions. You people on the left are about as desperate as people get. Pathetically desperate, habitually ignorant and just over all sad.
If it helps your hate grow... sure, let's go with they lied to make Democrats look bad or something.A BILLION dollar "edit"?
"Mistakes happen" is your excuse? A BILLION dollar "mistake"? As in "Oops, we LIED"?
Weak.