Current events discussion

Playing stupid again, huh? White washing history is not a big deal? Disrespecting black veterans is okay? I shouldn't have to explain why this is a big deal.....if you don't understand it.....that's your defect.
You should have been around when he said the veterans harmed by the burn pits didn't deserve compensation because they signed up for the job and knew the risks.

The same guy who got a big payout for being "injured" on a government job site.
 
Precisely. Because you do not believe, you think that changes reality.

Reality and facts do care a whit about whether they are believed or not. They do not change based on your beliefs.
Show proof that Trump is "whitewashing" history. Come on, show me facts. You know who whitewashes? CNN MSNBC and the like when they alter stories, edit videos, misquote all to push a narrative which can be proved by watching non biased media that report the whole unedited story.

Now, put up or shut up. Show me facts that Trump is whitewashing history.
 
Last edited:
Playing stupid again, huh? White washing history is not a big deal? Disrespecting black veterans is okay? I shouldn't have to explain why this is a big deal.....if you don't understand it.....that's your defect.
You need to show the PROOF of your claim backed up by FACTS or it is literally just you claiming it is happening or you are repeating what your biased media is feeding you.
 
The military shouldn't be part of dei...it's about what you are capable of...not identity or ethic make up...
I have to disagree. The military made inroads into desegregation and provided opportunities to blacks. I think military service would be a great way for the Latino immigrant community to earn citizenship. Where they need to draw the line is at combat readiness, ie I don't care what you identify as, your identity is tertiary to the mission and the unit. The military isn't going to accommodate you, you will be accommodating the military. No quotas. No exceptions to the physical fitness scores, no lowering the requirements so a dude who identifies as frog can be considered combat ready. Done in that manner, DEI can work within the military framework.

I think just the fact that you would be required to set aside your 🏳‍🌈 identity would be enough to keep the "wrong types" out of the military. By "wrong types" I mean those that seem to think that their 🏳‍🌈 identity is of paramount importance to themselves and everybody around them and entitles them to special consideration.
 
You should have been around when he said the veterans harmed by the burn pits didn't deserve compensation because they signed up for the job and knew the risks.

The same guy who got a big payout for being "injured" on a government job site.
Is that what I said @RobGMN ? Are you sure? Because that sounds like a lie to me. I say that because I am looking at the post I made. Oh all right... here is what I actually said...

"Do you think Military Service is a 9 - 5 office job???? There are risk, they know the risk, they accepted the risk. They were compensated for said risk via PAYCHECKS. They got medical benefits before and after service."

I never said they didn't deserve compensation I said they were compensated. You really love trying to make people look bad don't you. You have no shame at all.
 
Show proof that Trump is "whitewashing" history. Come on, show me facts. You know who whitewashes? CNN MSNBC and the like when they alter stories, edit videos, misquote all to push a narrative which can be proved by watching non biased media that report the whole unedited story.

Now, put up or shut up. Show me facts that Trump is whitewashing history.
You want me to prove something I never claimed?

Why do you feel I should be doing that?
 
Is that what I said @RobGMN ? Are you sure? Because that sounds like a lie to me. I say that because I am looking at the post I made. Oh all right... here is what I actually said...

"Do you think Military Service is a 9 - 5 office job???? There are risk, they know the risk, they accepted the risk. They were compensated for said risk via PAYCHECKS. They got medical benefits before and after service."

I never said they didn't deserve compensation I said they were compensated. You really love trying to make people look bad don't you. You have no shame at all.
You said they were already compensated with a paycheck. That means they do not deserve additional payment for their pain and suffering.

So YES, you said they didn't deserve compensation for the damage caused by the burn pits.
 
1742230481330.png
 
The diapered demented child stomps his feet.

1742234536211.png


You know, all those champagne producers in America 🙄
Could he be stupider if he put effort into it, or is he already bottom of the herd?
 
You said they were already compensated with a paycheck. That means they do not deserve additional payment for their pain and suffering.

So YES, you said they didn't deserve compensation for the damage caused by the burn pits.
There again is the problem with talking to you and people like you. That means to YOU they don't deserve additional compensation. I don't think like you and never said they don't deserve additional compensation. You know... Like the hazard pay they most likely got. Or what else do they call it... combat pay.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,962
Views
528,108
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
Curves.jpg

ThxOne

    May 25, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top