Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8893771" data-attributes="member: 673702"><p>I have to disagree. The military made inroads into desegregation and provided opportunities to blacks. I think military service would be a great way for the Latino immigrant community to earn citizenship. Where they need to draw the line is at combat readiness, ie I don't care what you identify as, your identity is tertiary to the mission and the unit. The military isn't going to accommodate you, you will be accommodating the military. No quotas. No exceptions to the physical fitness scores, no lowering the requirements so a dude who identifies as frog can be considered combat ready. Done in that manner, DEI can work within the military framework. </p><p></p><p>I think just the fact that you would be required to set aside your 🏳<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🌈" title="🌈" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f308.png" /> identity would be enough to keep the "wrong types" out of the military. By "wrong types" I mean those that seem to think that their 🏳<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🌈" title="🌈" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f308.png" /> identity is of paramount importance to themselves and everybody around them and entitles them to special consideration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8893771, member: 673702"] I have to disagree. The military made inroads into desegregation and provided opportunities to blacks. I think military service would be a great way for the Latino immigrant community to earn citizenship. Where they need to draw the line is at combat readiness, ie I don't care what you identify as, your identity is tertiary to the mission and the unit. The military isn't going to accommodate you, you will be accommodating the military. No quotas. No exceptions to the physical fitness scores, no lowering the requirements so a dude who identifies as frog can be considered combat ready. Done in that manner, DEI can work within the military framework. I think just the fact that you would be required to set aside your 🏳🌈 identity would be enough to keep the "wrong types" out of the military. By "wrong types" I mean those that seem to think that their 🏳🌈 identity is of paramount importance to themselves and everybody around them and entitles them to special consideration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list