Current events discussion

I will mention this again...
You are stating that Biden, Kamala, AOC, Pelosi, and many other dems are making false and/or unproven accusations when they said Trump was shot. Is that True?
Nope. They didn't make the claim Trump was shot in his ear lobe. Trump made the claim.

He also made the claim that Biden and Harris's rhetoric are the cause of the assassination attempt.
Do you think he is accurate about that claim?
“Their rhetoric is causing me to be shot at, when I am the one who is going to save the country and they are the ones that are destroying the country — both from the inside and out,” Trump said in comments to Fox News Digital.

He also said he "probably took a bullet to the head".
"I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy. I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy,"
Really? Confused about what his ear lobe is, and what his head actually is. Scary.

Of course, we have his suggestion that reporters should be shot while he hides behind bulletproof glass. What a classy guy to have as POTUS:
“I have this piece of glass here,” he said. “But all we have really over here is the fake news. And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don’t mind that so much.”
 
Prove something didn't happen when there is no proof it happened?

Prove there isn't a china teapot orbiting the sun, in an orbit bigger than Earth's, but smaller than Mars's.
Prove I can't do a 40 foot standing long jump.
Prove Trump oversaw the best economy in history.
Aweee, Rob is being stubborn. Is this how lil Robbie throws a fit. Deny facts and stick your bottom lip out? HAHHAHAHHA.
 
Yup, they are exactly the same bullets Rob. You win, **** off now... go find the guy with your trophy and remove it from his rectum.
You have quite the preoccupation with male body parts, for someone who claims to be superhetero.
Penises, rectums. Can't seem to get them off your mind.
Why is that?
 
Aweee, Rob is being stubborn. Is this how lil Robbie throws a fit. Deny facts and stick your bottom lip out? HAHHAHAHHA.
Pretty ironic statement from the guy who spent a ridiculous amount of posts trying to deny the facts about a .223 vs a 5.56 round, only to have to finally admit he was ill-informed the whole time.

Comedy gold.

Well I am not sure how ANYONE talking to you for more than 3 minutes doesn't think of you as a dick or an *******. Perhaps that is it.... nope, I'm sure that is it.
Yeah, THAT'S it.
And 99% of men with a Playboy subscription got it "for the articles" 🙄
 
Pretty ironic statement from the guy who spent a ridiculous amount of posts trying to deny the facts about a .223 vs a 5.56 round, only to have to finally admit he was ill-informed the whole time.

Comedy gold.


Yeah, THAT'S it.
And 99% of men with a Playboy subscription got it "for the articles" 🙄
Sad that you are so undesirable that you have to wack to mediocre **** mags.
 
Screen-Shot-2019-11-21-at-2.30.56-PM-1414732824.png


Because Trump wasn't "shot" in the ear lobe...it's false that he was grazed on the upper ear...

The sheer stupidity and ignorance Rob is arguing with is beyond even his normal threshold 🤣🤣🤣
 
Oooops!

Well, technically, it will cause the same damage to the paper. it's too thin to build up a large exit wound. If you were talking about ballistic gel or a dear, then it would depend on how far away they are. As for which would do the most damage, would depend on how the bullet reacts. The 223/556 is designed to tumble when it hits a target. If it tumbles, then the 556 will cause more damage. If it goes straight, then the 223 will be more deadly because it will likely not exit as much as the 556. It's like running a needle into your arm. You do it slow, you feel it. If you do it fast, you don't. However, the faster route is more likely to cause more bruising due to the sudden impact.
The 556 tends to tumble and shatter at close range (~150 yards or less iirc) and tends to punch straight thru for the next few 100 yards and then starts tumbling again.
 
Nope. They didn't make the claim Trump was shot in his ear lobe. Trump made the claim.

He also made the claim that Biden and Harris's rhetoric are the cause of the assassination attempt.
Do you think he is accurate about that claim?
“Their rhetoric is causing me to be shot at, when I am the one who is going to save the country and they are the ones that are destroying the country — both from the inside and out,” Trump said in comments to Fox News Digital.

He also said he "probably took a bullet to the head".
"I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy. I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy,"
Really? Confused about what his ear lobe is, and what his head actually is. Scary.

Of course, we have his suggestion that reporters should be shot while he hides behind bulletproof glass. What a classy guy to have as POTUS:
“I have this piece of glass here,” he said. “But all we have really over here is the fake news. And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don’t mind that so much.”
Don't believe it's Biden & Harris's rhetoric that caused the assassination attempt. The rhetoric is just out there coming from everywhere. Their rhetoric contributed to the assassination attempt, much like Trump's rhetoric contributed to what happened on Jan 6th.
 
I just want to throw this out there. I don't think anyone is debating that the projectile isn't exactly the same however the cartridge as a whole (case and projectile together) is what I am arguing. Placing the projectile in the 5.56 NATO spec casing is what then makes the cartridge different than the .223 Remington. I know Rob likes to assume everyone is talking about what is literally in his head and his terminology and the way he sees it. This will hopefully have everyone on the same page. It is the case that makes the cartridges different. The exact same projectile, two different ammos. This means definitively that they ARE different.

Diferences-2.jpg

Differences.jpg
 
I just want to throw this out there. I don't think anyone is debating that the projectile isn't exactly the same however the cartridge as a whole (case and projectile together) is what I am arguing. Placing the projectile in the 5.56 NATO spec casing is what then makes the cartridge different than the .223 Remington. I know Rob likes to assume everyone is talking about what is literally in his head and his terminology and the way he sees it. This will hopefully have everyone on the same page. It is the case that makes the cartridges different. The exact same projectile, two different ammos. This means definitively that they ARE different.

View attachment 62451
View attachment 62452
Either cartridge is capable of grazing an ear...
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,850
Views
464,115
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top