Current events discussion

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Where’s crowcane Mitch?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

My bad, so you actually are comparing supernovae to the radiation humanity is capable of emitting? I guess that brings me back to my original question, why compare to a Super Nova, when the sun operating at "normal" emits more radiation than if we blew all our nukes simultaneously?

Or technology could be the key to all sorts of higher levels of being. Maybe purely organic existence is what keeps people tethered to "lower dimensions." What about people with insulin pumps, heart monitors, pace makers, artificial knees & hips, screws, rods, plates, nerve stimulators, wiring, etc, etc, etc. Are those folks destined for hell? What about people like Steven Hawking who basically required technology to function? What about society in general, which certainly descend into chaos tomorrow if somebody magically turned off the technology switch? Should I trade in my Ridgeline for a horse?

No, I was comparing nuclear weapons and nuclear research to super novas in relationship to black holes...which is back where we started lol

Fearing death and merging with technology to try to avoid death, like become immortal in 3d on earth, that's a trap. Hooking your brain up to AI to experience an augmented or alternate reality is a trap. Our organic life already covers all these things, such as reincarnation, but physical death scares people. AI and technology stepping in to change or alter or stop the death process is a trap by evil.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Speaking of AI taking over humanity, wtf is musk saying, that we must merge with AI because it's a danger to us?:

"Musk emphasised that the long-term goal is to reduce the civilisational risk posed by AI by fostering “a closer symbiosis between human intelligence and digital intelligence.”

Elon Musk stated that the goal is “to give people superpowers,”..."

Elon Musk's Neuralink Prepares For Second Human Trial, Aims 'Superpower' Capabilities

Earlier in January, Neuralink successfully transplanted the device into the brain of a man who was paralysed from the shoulders down in a diving accident.

www.news18.com

^^It's a trap, like setting out cheese for a mouse...

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

NATO allies call China a 'decisive enabler' of Russia's war in Ukraine

In their most serious rebuke against Beijing, NATO allies have called China a “decisive enabler” of Russia’s war against Ukraine and expressed concerns over China’s nuclear arsenal and its capabilities in space.

apnews.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

No, I was comparing nuclear weapons and nuclear research to super novas in relationship to black holes...which is back where we started lol

Fearing death and merging with technology to try to avoid death, like become immortal in 3d on earth, that's a trap. Hooking your brain up to AI to experience an augmented or alternate reality is a trap. Our organic life already covers all these things, such as reincarnation, but physical death scares people. AI and technology stepping in to change or alter or stop the death process is a trap by evil.

So pacemakers, oxygen machines, etc are all the work of "the devil?" I'm not buying it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

How about Pelosi and the rest of the insider traders in DC? Can we impeach them too AOC?

MSN

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

So pacemakers, oxygen machines, etc are all the work of "the devil?" I'm not buying it.

That's not really what I mean. Lol it's useless I guess to try to explain. You don't know what's already out there, tech wise. You don't understand the plans of merging AI with humanity and the end goal. You literally take the cheapest argument where you try to use your brain the least

Say a pacemaker: if an evil gov runs AI and AI runs your heart pulse, then the gov decides it needs less people to stop carbon emissions, in what way are they going to use AI?

Like, govs or corporations researching diseases has lead to weaponizing diseases. AI is fundamentally weaponized. Anything you don't directly control will be weaponized against you. When AI surpasses human intelligence and it's also hooked up to your body, who's actually going to control what you are?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

That's not really what I mean. Lol it's useless I guess to try to explain. You don't know what's already out there, tech wise. You don't understand the plans of merging AI with humanity and the end goal. You literally take the cheapest argument where you try to use your brain the least

Say a pacemaker: if an evil gov runs AI and AI runs your heart pulse, then the gov decides it needs less people to stop carbon emissions, in what way are they going to use AI?

Like, govs or corporations researching diseases has lead to weaponizing diseases. AI is fundamentally weaponized. Anything you don't directly control will be weaponized against you. When AI surpasses human intelligence and it's also hooked up to your body, who's actually going to control what you are?

Actually I work in healthcare, nerve stims, they're actually replacing parts of the nervous system with "mechanical" parts, pace makers. Brain implants will likely replace drugs for nervous system disorders.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Foxconn no showed.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/11/politics/us-germany-foiled-russian-assassination-plot/index.html

Russia vows ‘military response’ to US missile deployment plans

Russia will develop a “military” response to US plans to deploy long-range weapons in Germany, Sergey Ryabkov has said

www.rt.com

U.S. Long-Range Missiles Headed To Germany As Arms Race Escalates

After a decades-long hiatus, American long-range missiles will return to Europe as the standoff between Moscow and NATO grows. Russia has already warned it will respond to U.S. plans to deploy longer-range ground-launched missiles in Germany.

www.twz.com

 

[Old_Slapper]

Are you seriously unable to see the difference between what Trump did vs Hilary & Co? Not to mention the differences in the audiences?

I totally see the difference. Clinton and Co celebrated REAL extremely violent riots. Trump did not. Just last month, Pelosi doubled down on her calling Trump an "illegitimate" President.

Believe it or not, there is a crap ton of people messing with ballots. I will not get into the exacts, but it doesn't take much to see what the shady stuff was. Do you actually believe Biden was able to pull off more votes than Obama? No, I never saw the movie "2000 Mules," and I have no plans to. Even though there is a lot of evidence pointing to fraud, there is no proof on who the fraud benefited. This is why you will only hear "there is no proof." Then they give it a name like "THE BIG LIE," then start cancelling anyone who speaks about it.

Even last month, Clinton was asked if Trump won fairly, and she will not answer the questions.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/s/30PAz4Ld2t

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I totally see the difference. Clinton and Co celebrated REAL extremely violent riots. Trump did not. Just last month, Pelosi doubled down on her calling Trump an "illegitimate" President.

Believe it or not, there is a crap ton of people messing with ballots. I will not get into the exacts, but it doesn't take much to see what the shady stuff was. Do you actually believe Biden was able to pull off more votes than Obama? No, I never saw the movie "2000 Mules," and I have no plans to. Even though there is a lot of evidence pointing to fraud, there is no proof on who the fraud benefited. This is why you will only hear "there is no proof." Then they give it a name like "THE BIG LIE," then start cancelling anyone who speaks about it.

Even last month, Clinton was asked if Trump won fairly, and she will not answer the questions.

There is no evidence. Trump got more votes than he previously got as well - that's just indicative of more people voting because voting was made easier; that is not evidence of fraud. FWIW, 2000 Mules is more proof that they don't have any proof. Did people commit fraud - absolutely and some have been caught. Enough to swing an election while leaving behind no evidence - no f'n way.

Regardless of what Clinton or Pelosi have said, Trump turned "stolen election" into the GOP platform. They ran Cheney out who is about as conservative as it gets. They've prevented anybody who won't go along with the stolen election narrative from being nominated. That's vastly different than Clinton's bitching and whining.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Jimi what’s happening