Current events discussion

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

1. It was investigated under Bush and Trump administrations, not Biden.
2. It was very clearly stated that a list existed and would be released, then suddenly "There is no list"
"In a March TV interview, she claimed the Biden administration “sat on these documents, no one did anything with them,” adding: “Sadly these people don’t believe in transparency, but I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don’t believe in honesty.
But after a months-long review of evidence in the government’s possession, the Justice Department determined that no “further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,” the memo says."

Epstein client list doesn't exist, DOJ says, walking back theory Bondi promoted

The Justice Department will not release more files related to the wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein's *** trafficking investigation despite promises from Attorney General Pam Bondi.

www.pbs.org

And what they DID "release" was info that was already in public domain.
3. Trump is doing what he can to overshadow it, even suddenly publicly complaining that people should stop talking about it. He just desperately wants it to go away.
Now, it's "let's arrest Obama" (ranked among the best POTUSes in history, while Trump is ranked among the worst, and sometimes worst), or complain about the name of a football team, or accuse Harris of violating FEC rules (which Trump actually DID and was investigated for), using sugar in soda, or claiming Epstein was a hoax (his favorite word, that he doesn't seem to know the meaning of): "I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country’s history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don’t even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don’t want their support anymore!"

If it's all truly a hoax and Trump is 100% innocent, there is no reason to keep the files hidden after so openly promising they would be released.
Smoke, meet fire.

So because the investigation occurred during the Bush administration, BidenCo is unaware if Trump is implicated? Give me a break.

There is plenty of reason to keep it private. As long as "the list" is kept private it has value as a blackmail list. Once the list is released, it loses it's value and actually becomes a liability. But that logic does fit the Orange Man bad narrative and therefore must be rejected by Team Blue.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So because the investigation occurred during the Bush administration, BidenCo is unaware if Trump is implicated? Give me a break.

So why was it not released during the Bush or Trump admins when it was investigated?
It wasn't investigated under Biden, but HE'S the bad guy who is keeping things hidden?
One break, coming up.

There is plenty of reason to keep it private. As long as "the list" is kept private it has value as a blackmail list. Once the list is released, it loses it's value and actually becomes a liability. But that logic does fit the Orange Man bad narrative and therefore must be rejected by Team Blue.

So Orange Man wants the list kept private in order to use it for blackmailing people.
That would make him a bad Orange Man.
Got it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So why didn't Obama continue to investigate child abuse and trafficking after bush?

If we use "Rob Logic," then Obama or Biden or (most likely) Hunter were implicated, so the investigation stalled.

It isn't enough that Trump went back on his word and is likely protecting some very powerful people; they have to portray him as PDF file. This demonstrates the major difference between Team Red vs Team Blue. Team Blue always operates from the assumption that Trump is one of the worse people on the planet and works backwards to fit the facts into that narrative.

While Team Red often does the same, it's a smaller cohort, it's less often, less consistent. I don't know if you saw my post about collective narcissism, but Team Blue's behavior on this issue is a good example.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Still pretty sure there was a president between Bush and Trump

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

nm lol I'm dumb too

So what does rob not believe all women? Ashley Biden says it's real

Only if they are accusing Trump. You know Rob's deal. Team Blue to the end, no matter what.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

View attachment 66780

usually - under normal conditions; generally.
restricted - limited in extent, number, scope, or action.
You asserted that under normal conditions (i.e. "USUALLY"), optical cable is limited (i.e. "RESTRICTED") to 96kHz.

Are you saying that owning a streamer that outputs optical at 192kHz, a DAC that accepts 192kHz in, and an $8 cable that passes optical at 192kHz is not "normal conditions"?
What do you think this is, 1999?

A FiiO Sr11 can do 192kHz out at the optical port. for $109. A Topping DAC for $99 will accept the stream.
Connect the two with an $8 cable.
Wow. Completely abnormal and unattainable

Are you really this stupid? The only words YOU need to focus on is the one you said I used and the one I actually used.

I said USUALLY.
You claim I said "Can't" as part of "can't handle"

Usually means there literally are other option.
"Can't handle" is absolute.

Do you ******* understand the difference??? I said usually because it is LITERALLY the words used in several pieces of literature describing optical CABLES. Not the abilities of hardware, OPTICAL CABLES.

Smarten up Chief.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Only if they are accusing Trump. You know Rob's deal. Team Blue to the end, no matter what.

Facts to the end, no matter what.

Show me the evidence against Biden, and let's compare it tot he evidence against Trump.

We already know Trump is a ******, a felon, and a ****** predator. And now we have the mysterious disappearing list.
Stop being Team Red to the end no matter what, and produce the evidence against Biden.

No, Biden hugging child is not evidence. Yes, Trump trying to kiss children that are not his, on the lips, is evidence.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Facts to the end, no matter what.

Show me the evidence against Biden, and let's compare it tot he evidence against Trump.

We already know Trump is a ******, a felon, and a ****** predator. And now we have the mysterious disappearing list.
Stop being Team Red to the end no matter what, and produce the evidence against Biden.

No, Biden hugging child is not evidence. Yes, Trump trying to kiss children that are not his, on the lips, is evidence.

Only if you think it helps your side. Otherwise you reject facts.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Are you really this stupid? The only words YOU need to focus on is the one you said I used and the one I actually used.

I said USUALLY.

usually - under normal conditions; generally.
YOU used the term, not me. YOU stated that under normal conditions, optical is RESTRICTED to 96kHz.
When your car is "restricted" to 135MPH by gearing and HP, it means "can't do more".
When terminal velocity of an object is "restricted" by physics, it means "CAN'T DO MORE".

"Restricted" means "limited in extent, number, scope, or action" it means "can't do more". Literally the meaning of the word.

You claim I said "Can't" as part of "can't handle"

Usually means there literally are other option.
"Can't handle" is absolute.

usually - under normal conditions; generally.
192kHz can be passed by optical cable under VERY normal conditions.
Optical cable is NOT "usually" "restricted" to 96kHz in this day and age.
Try to keep up.

Do you ******* understand the difference??? I said usually because it is LITERALLY the words used in several pieces of literature describing optical CABLES. Not the abilities of hardware, OPTICAL CABLES.

So you quoted outdated info without understanding the reality of today's technology.
Why not just say that, admit you fucked up, and move on?

Instead you'll fight to the death, claiming that the entire audio (and data communications) world is wrong, but you are right.
Just like your argument that the entire medical science world is wrong, but you are right.
Just like your argument that mathematics is wrong, but you are right.
And you don't see ANY problem with that.

You support Team Wrong to the end, no matter what.
Anything to not admit your own errors.
Wow.

Smarten up Chief.

Go read up on data transmission via fiber optics, instead of trying to dox me.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

usually - under normal conditions; generally.
YOU used the term, not me. YOU stated that under normal conditions, optical is RESTRICTED to 96kHz.
When your car is "restricted" to 135MPH by gearing and HP, it means "can't do more".
When terminal velocity of an object is "restricted" by physics, it means "CAN'T DO MORE".

"Restricted" means "limited in extent, number, scope, or action" it means "can't do more". Literally the meaning of the word.


usually - under normal conditions; generally.
192kHz can be passed by optical cable under VERY normal conditions.
Optical cable is NOT "usually" "restricted" to 96kHz in this day and age.
Try to keep up.

So you quoted outdated info without understanding the reality of today's technology.
Why not just say that, admit you fucked up, and move on?

Instead you'll fight to the death, claiming that the entire audio (and data communications) world is wrong, but you are right.
Just like your argument that the entire medical science world is wrong, but you are right.
Just like your argument that mathematics is wrong, but you are right.
And you don't see ANY problem with that.

You support Team Wrong to the end, no matter what.
Anything to not admit your own errors.
Wow.


Go read up on data transmission via fiber optics, instead of trying to dox me.

So you have no idea that the words usually and can't are two different words with different meanings. Good job ignoring reality just to continue YOUR asinine argument.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you have no idea that the words usually and can't are two different words with different meanings. Good job ignoring reality just to continue YOUR asinine argument.

Still trying to die on that hill, huh?

usually - under normal conditions; generally
You believe that "under normal conditions" an optical cable is "limited" to 96kHz, despite all evidence to to the contrary.

And you will defend that belief to the death, despite ALL evidence to the contrary.

FiiO SR11. 192kHz at optical out:

Topping DAC. Accepts 192kHz at optical in:

KabelDirekt Optical cable. Rated for 192kHz.

VERY UNusual stuff, with VERY UNusual capabilities.
Capabilities USUALLY only available to scientists, and billionaires! NOT normal!
LOL

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Still trying to die on that hill, huh?

usually - under normal conditions; generally
You believe that "under normal conditions" an optical cable is "limited" to 96kHz, despite all evidence to to the contrary.

And you will defend that belief to the death, despite ALL evidence to the contrary.

FiiO SR11. 192kHz at optical out:
View attachment 66781


Topping DAC. Accepts 192kHz at optical in:View attachment 66782


KabelDirekt Optical cable. Rated for 192kHz.
View attachment 66783


VERY UNusual stuff, with VERY UNusual capabilities.
Capabilities USUALLY only available to scientists, and billionaires! NOT normal!
LOL

Usually and Can't. Tell me the difference.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No matter the topic, RobGMN is here to argue it and knows best. This piece of trash is still arguing cables and not the dumb *** statement he made when he said I used words I didn't use. Then he refuses to acknowledge that usually and can't are two different words with two different meanings.


SO, this idiot police chief in Cincinnati... who thinks she is far left?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So why was it not released during the Bush or Trump admins when it was investigated?
It wasn't investigated under Biden, but HE'S the bad guy who is keeping things hidden?
One break, coming up.

I never said Biden is bad guy. Why do you continue to attribute things to me I never said? Assuming there is an Epstein blackmail list with evidence against Trump, do you believe Team Blue wouldn't use that against Trump?

So Orange Man wants the list kept private in order to use it for blackmailing people.
That would make him a bad Orange Man.
Got it.

I think the FBI & CIA would rather blackmail powerful people than prosecute them. In a perfect world, we'd hang these (alleged) PDF files, but we don't live in a perfect world. I suspect if there is a list, then Trump, the CIA, FBI State Dept, et al are being pragmatic.

Two things are for sure: 1) If Bush & Trump decided to sit on a blackmail list, then so Biden. 2) You will condemn Trump and portray him to be a PDF file, but Where Do I Go Joe will escape such criticism.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

If Bush & Trump decided to sit on a blackmail list, then so Biden.

So did the president who had the opportunity but isn't mentioned for some reason