Haven't you learned from ca.com that if you complain enough, you'll get your way in life. I pretended like the school gave me a ticket.
UPS is actually easy to deal with in claims and as I stated earlier, pretty lenient on their packaging policies. I clearly see the buyer is actually "OK" with the damages and wants the equipment. The lashing out against a UPS claim is because they fear losing posession of the equipment. They just want another $100 and the equipment. I still would have offered $50 before doing a claim as that is just that much easier. I also don't need the money as bad as you. Clearly a claim with UPS should be ok with the buyer though. If it the damage bothered me that much I would have told you to run a claim from the start. If UPS laid blme on you then I would seek money from you. Some people just want everything though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif
um I said I ralized that in the response //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
I bet you were here but not here all at the same time.
I offered $50 and he refused. I emailed him about getting an estimate for damages and he refused.
So he is being a difficult buyer. I know to steer clear. Thanks. I hate irrational people. Tell him to get bent then. I can't believe JNTAR wouldgo to bat for someone who wantsto be so irrational. He needs to stay out of it as he is far from unbiased in this situation, but doubt he will.
No. I was just using quantum theory in my response. Nothing more.
