Center Channel or No Center Channel?

fasfocus00
5,000+ posts

doITdaWHITEwayORdoITtwice
I got a Rogue and now want to put a system in it. I have the SL with the Premium Bose System (joke of system). The system has a center channel on the dash. I was going to keep it but am now considering scraping that idea. other than imaging will I really miss out on anything by eliminating the center channel?

 
Depends on what is more important to you. Watching movies or listening to audio. Center channel helps to "lock" the audio imaging on the screen (when your not seated dead center), but mostly ruins the stereo imaging effect created by the L & R. Especially for music.

IMO, center channel is not needed. Spend more on your main L & R speakers instead.

 
Depends on what is more important to you. Watching movies or listening to audio. Center channel helps to "lock" the audio imaging on the screen (when your not seated dead center), but mostly ruins the stereo imaging effect created by the L & R. Especially for music.

IMO, center channel is not needed. Spend more on your main L & R speakers instead.
i'm keeping the factory headunit that has no nav or dvd function. it's just going to be playing music.

 
other than imaging will I really miss out on anything by eliminating the center channel?
Having a center channel for non-5.1 sources isn't really "imaging", it's just faking it.

You'd be surprised at what two-channel can do for a center image, by itself //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
i've got MB Quarts to replace all the door speakers just don't have the 3.5in to replace the center channel.
What ever money you were going to spend on the center speaker, rear speakers and eq; instead spend on upgrading your 6 1/2" front door speakers. Get higher end MBQ's, Focals, Boston Acoustics or step up to Dynaudios. Skip the rear speakers.

Power them off an external amp with plenty of power. Use lots of SecondSkin DP to seal up the doors well.

That would be money and time much better spent than eq, center speaker or rear speakers.

 
well fellas thank you all for your input. and for me to help you guys out on stuff I got. EQ is going to be an Audiocontrol Three.1, speakers are MB Quart QSDs (front and rear), amps are Hifonics Txi 6408 and 1508 or Crunch GVP 1600.4 and 2000.1, as for sub I don't have anything laying around that I'd want to use but I was thinking of either an AQ HDC12 or 2 AQ SDC2.5 10

 
Depends on what is more important to you. Watching movies or listening to audio. Center channel helps to "lock" the audio imaging on the screen (when your not seated dead center), but mostly ruins the stereo imaging effect created by the L & R. Especially for music.

IMO, center channel is not needed. Spend more on your main L & R speakers instead.
Having a center channel for non-5.1 sources isn't really "imaging", it's just faking it.
You'd be surprised at what two-channel can do for a center image, by itself //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
I tend to agree with the above statements, only because it is generally done WRONG.
Many people let the L and R channels play the center channel information freely, and simply summing the two channels for the center channel information. This results in a response as outlined above.

I am a big proponent of stereo at HOME, but in a car, other methods should be employed for better imaging.

You need an external processor, such as the audio control ESP-3, to have a discrete center channel and discrete left and right channels. In addition, you need ambiance with a L-R channel and R-L channel for the rear. This combination runs circles around stereo in a car since you are generally way to close and off center to produce a stereo image accurately. Time alignment, EQ, etc. are only band aids.

This is by far the easiest way to produce an accurate image. All that's really needed is EQ for the response, which saves a lot of time with tuning. There are other methods, such as VBAP (vector based amplitude planning) which could prove to be better, but are more complicated and require external processing via a computer.

Here is a simple outline for the the basics of a "matrix stereo"

http://www.sonicdesign.se/matrix.htm

With the surround speakers added, using discrete channels is not necessarily needed, but does improve width.

The result?

A TRUE two-seater car without compromises!

You can create a two-seater car with stereo. However, one seat will have a staging/imaging advantage while the other will have tonality balance. YOU CANT HAVE BOTH!

One more note, If you can, I would try to move the midrange/treble to the A-pillars for a more concrete height for L/R channels. Then run dedicated midbass in the doors/kicks. Or atleast in the kicks. Although, with the ambiance, it generally is not required //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Regards,

-Serg

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

fasfocus00

5,000+ posts
doITdaWHITEwayORdoITtwice
Thread starter
fasfocus00
Joined
Location
New Orleans, LA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
13
Views
1,867
Last reply date
Last reply from
Fast1one
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top