zane- it's quite funny that you are apparently sucked in by your own ignorance.
From what your saying if a JL W7 handles up to 500 watts, you believe its false because that is what the industry tells you......AND OBVIOUSLY IF ITS THE INDUSTRY IT MUST BE FALSE IN YOUR CASE!!!!! **** I WOULD HATE TO BUY ANYTHING FROM YOU OR GET ADVICE FROM YOU BECAUSE EITHER I WOULD BE UNDERPOWERING EVERYTHING, OR OVERPOWERING IT.
I stand correct in my previous statement. Thank you for sharing your non-factual, and unknowledgeable view point.
My own ignorance ehh? Might want to re-think that one bucko.
Last I checked there is still not a power standard regulating amplifiers that requires them to produce the exact number of watts they state they do.
I have a JBL BP1200.1 rated to produce 1200 x 1 @ 2 ohm mono. Guess what, 1326 watts @ 2 ohm mono is what it benched at.
I have a Lanzar Vibe 258 - rated at 1600 x 1 @ 4 ohm mono. Guess what, 922w x 1 @ 4 ohm mono is what it benched at.
I have an Xtant x1001 which is rated at 1000 x 1 @ 2 ohm mono. Guess what, 1847 watts @ 2 ohm mono is what it benched at. - Even more than I anticipated in my previous review of this amp:
http://momentum.soundillusions.net/Feb04/testbench.html
Oddly enough, I am currently pushing an eD 12.o-44 at 2 ohms with this amp. Oops! - Thats well beyond what they recommend!
I'm sure that several others can "chime in" as to their own amps producing "exactly" what they are rated at.
I previously ran 1000 watts to a pair of JL Audio 12w0 -4's at 2 ohm mono, funny that they are only rated for 125w yet had no issues handling the additional 700 sent to them.
Guess that the 4 RF HE2 15's that I pushed at 1 ohm from an old RF Power 50.2 didn't produce the 156.6db in my old SPL setup either, as there wouldn't be enough power per the Power 50.2 is only rated at 50w x 2.
I personally like a statement from Dan Wiggins of Adire Audio for myths relating to this matter:
Rated power of a driver is the required power for the driver... Man I hate that one...
Dan Wiggins
Adire Audio
http://www.carsound.com/cgi-bin/UBB_CGI/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=022292;p=2
It's called marketing. There are profoundly more people out there in the audio world that are manipulating physics, and overcomming the physical confines of their vehicle by doing nearly the opposite of what the manufacturer recommends. Manufacturer spec's are merely a loose form of guidelines.
I personally like the way Nick (Electrodynamic) from SI has put it:
For those who don't live by a spec sheet.
Then again, everything the industry tells us is true. If they say that a cap works, then it must. If they say a speaker can only handle 50 watts, then that is all it can handle. If they say an amplifier only produces 400 watts, then that is all it can produce. Blindly following everything that is told to us, and not subjecting those theory's or products to testing rather limits the end user on the whole, and may cause people to spend more money than they actually need to.
Without subjective testing to find out for ourselves, we are at a loss, as each company would be assumed correct all of the time.
I think that nature and science have taught us that there are no absolutes.
It is also quite funny, and certainly unappropriate, that you assume a capacitor does nothing......just because the industry says it does. (And i personally trust the best accessory company of over 20 years, then you, or from someone else)
I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT WHEN I USE A CAPACITOR, MY VOLTAGE READS CONSIDERABLY HIGHER FROM THE CHARTS YOU SHOW ME, OH MY GOD...........THAT CAN'T BE RIGHT, THERE MUST BE SOMTHING WRONG WITH IT THEN IF IT DOES WHAT IT IS SUPPOSE TO. SHIT I MADE A MISTAKE, IT WASNT SUPPOSE TO HELP MY SYSTEM, LOOKS LIKE IM GONNA HAVE TO SELL IT.......................
Unappropriate is making assumptions and statements about anyone's personal life and situations relating to their personal life when you have
ZERO grounds to do so.
Funny is that you assume a capacitor does in fact work effectively and efficiently; relying solely on what the industry tells you. Of course Stinger will tell you a cap is great. They make them. They sell them. They make profit from them. They can't very well go around marketing a product effectively by telling people that they don't work exactly as described.
Yes, Stinger is one heck of a company, I use their products myself. However, the description "best accessory company," is subjective and merely opinion. Ixos has been around for a considerable amount of time, and also has recieved several awards for it's products. Not all of it's implementations and design are shared or held in the same value as other companies. Whoever you may trust to be correct, may have an equally popular counterpart with different ideas in which another may trust to be correct. At this point, it just becomes a shouting match of flaring opinion, not much fact.
Hillarious is that you actually believe a capacitor has the physical ability in design to raise voltage. A capacitor is a storage device, not a source device. The capacitor depends completely on the alternator. The alternator and it's regulator solely determine vehicle voltage. A capacitor has
nothing to do with it.
I suppose that every automotive electrical reference is incorrect though, and that we need to start adding caps to cars to make them function correctly....
Your so ignorant and i personally find it very offensive and unwelcoming that you post any of your knowledge to anyone. Like i said before anyone who listens to you is obviously going to underpower or over power anything they have just because you have a stick up your *** about what the industry tells you, (Who buy the way are the designers and creators of all car audio such and such that you have in your trunk, door panels, etc.) And I will personally believe the industry, the ones who make the stuff, and I will believe a reputable company (Stinger)
Can't see you proving any of that either..... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif