Qts: 0.953And the XXX is a very efficient sub? Im not here to compare SS product to RE's product. Im just asking for some info, like other people in this thread. You still havent answered my question, Who are you? Are you with RE or just another fanboy?
Qes: 1.114
Qms: 5.712
Fs: 25.51 Hz
Re: 2.92
Ls: 2.445 mH
Lp: 7.932 mH
Rp: 2.81
Dia:
(% shift) 334 m
16.3 %
Vas: 85.37 L
Mms: 491.4 g
Cms: 79.18 u
Bl: 14.18 T*m
n0: 119.2 m
SPL: 82.8 dB
Sd: 0.0876 m^2
Xmax: 38.5 mm
Looking at the specs here...the QTS is HUGE, like big ass sealed or IB huge. Kinda pointless for an in car vented setup. Efficiency is uber low, 83db's...you'd have to feed it REDICULOUS amounts of power for it to get even close to it's Xmax. Making it impracticle for almost all car setups, useless for SPL, and pretty much pointless for 99% of the installs out there. They were like, **** lets make an uber excursion LMT sub that we don't care about the parameters or anything worth while.