Boston Acoustics vs Diamond Audio vs MB Quarts

I find the MB & Diamonds sound allmost the same. They're bright in the high frequencies. The Bostons are more neutral throught the entire frequency range. If you listen for extended periods of time (long drives) the Bostons might be easier on your ears.

 
i would say the bostons unless you wanna be a tweeter king...never heard a set of diamonds or quarts (owned all 3) that i could listen too for more than 5 minutes that wasnt rta'd and then eq'd so it didnt "break glass". the people that do well with these components (diamond and mb) take the harshness out.....thats why you have bostons and focal and dynaudio and image dynamics...heck even the jl sets lol. they are more mellow from the word go.....Oz audio is good also

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Best of luck on the search of these Gems 👀 👀 💩
1
2K
Massive doesn't provide much technical detail on the CT2, but looking at the response curve suggests an FS of ~1.4khz and the listed frequency...
15
2K
I had some of theyre subs and components in the past in the late 90s. They were nothing special and were expensive. I had better luck with Bostons...
11
1K

About this thread

Si-R

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
Si-R
Joined
Location
Canada
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
9
Views
1,741
Last reply date
Last reply from
audiolife
1000008028.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 20, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
1000008027.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 20, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top