bi-amping or bi-wiring

  • 3
    Participant count
  • Participant list

revoh
10+ year member

Junior Member
16
0
Texas
I am about to get my full system installed (just waiting on my brahma15) and have been talking to a local install shop about my installation. The owner is the guy who is helping me and seems to be real knowledgeable about installing. Anyways, I have a set of Infinity Kappa Perfect 6.1's and he is saying that I should bypass the supplied crossover and use the active crossovers on the amplifier instead of the passive crossovers that came with it because passive crossovers cause a loss of signal. I am not sure if you call this bi-amping or bi-wiring but he wants me to get a 4 channel amp (4x50 rms) and run each of the 4 channels to each individual speaker in my component set. That would be 50watts to each tweeter and 50 watts to each woofer.

However, in my manual is states this:

The combined responses of the speakers and passive crossover constitute 4th-order Linquitz-Riley acoustic alignment and cannot be duplicated by any electronic crossover currently available for car audio use.

I showed that to the installer and he still thinks it will sound better with his method of bypassing the crossovers. What do you guys think? Is the 4th-order Linquitz-Riley thing really that important or is it just manufacturer hype? I'd appreciate any thoughts on this. Thanks!

-revoh

 
Being as we just got into this discussion on another board I am on I can answer this for you with my opinion. Linkwitz-Riley Crossovers provie a very clean sound more so than other types of crossovers and are used in a wide range of systems. Mostly geared towards Sound Quality. Using the crossover that came with the component set is HIGHLY recommended. It cuts off the mid and low range to the highs, it cuts off the low end and high end to the mids. You will not lose anything for sound quality and in fact will gain as I see it. You can still use a crossover on the amp to drain the low end from them more. (which may or may not be necessary) BUT can be a benefit as well. In my opinion.......this guy is a jackass for suggesting NOT using a crossover system on a component set.

 
Yes, alaxan is absolutely right, you difinately SHOULD use the passive crossover. I doubt that you can reach the same smooth transition from mids to tweets with the amp active crossovers + it's really not so difficult to damage the tweeters without using the passive crossover which is protecting them (specialy at clipped signals).

So, I would strongly suggest you use the passive crossover, even if you're using the active one too (never hurts to have a higher slope cut off at low freqs).

Hope it helps, bye!

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

I think you need like a 10x switch on an amp? You would need to bandpass the mids or something Pioneer network mode or similar? I know the new...
3
1K
Need to know what the woofers are, make model, dual, single voice coils and their respective impedances to provide you with the best way to wire...
2
63
I agree with every one above. OFC is much better. Copper is a much better conductor than aluminum.
6
358

About this thread

revoh

10+ year member
Junior Member
Thread starter
revoh
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
2
Views
898
Last reply date
Last reply from
marcopolo
1000007975.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 16, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
1000007974.jpg

Mr FaceCaser

    May 16, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top