wasnt he hitting 170+ db with it too?sorry to thread jack but if the brahma is an sq sub why does scottie J have a van full of em?
yup in that video of them cracking the frame of his door :/wasnt he hitting 170+ db with it too?
yea beats me man...i wonder why there hasnt been a tc sounds comp vehicle (thats not a sarcstic remark....im honestly curious)yup in that video of them cracking the frame of his door :/
i see. so how does the Tumult compare to the brahma? And also if you wanted SQ from a TC sound you would get a LMS or LMT series....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifthey were brama extremes which were actually somenthing like the XXX's IIRC....feel free to correct me if im wrong
Is that actually true or did the RATED power drop? IIRC the VC's on the newer brahmas are actually larger than the old ones. They just used some non-standard rating for their RMS, which is why they always stressed that you rarely need over 1000 watts in any reasonable box.If I remember correctly...brahma extremes have upgraded softparts. I don't remember if they did anything else to it.
Brahma vs Tumult: Tumult is an extremely low frequency driver...and I do mean wicked low. In a car audio environment...I prefer the Brahma. The tumult is awesome in a home environment. It's kinda sad...but the newer driver power handling has dropped quite a bit.
tuan