//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif Are you on LSD? You apparently know nothing about the NSX, as you wouldn't be comparing it to a lan evo. The entire purpose of the nsx is handling around a track. Perhaps the evo is a faster car, which it very well may be. However, what you're saying is like saying a nascar is better than a F1 car because it has a higher top speed. The NSX is not the fastest car in a straight line; it doesn't need to be. I'd put quite a bit of money on it that around the Nurburgring, a lan evo 8 would lose to a 1994 nsx. Oh wait, maybe that's because it already did. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifNo I was serious...there power and handling are both worse then the evo..I will say though that driving the nsx is cooler...much more exotic....But the evo is just a better car.....the nsx was a great car back in 1992....today its mediocar at best...