Abortion

Abortion?

  • Pro Life

    Votes: 19 23.8%
  • Pro Choice

    Votes: 61 76.3%

  • Total voters
    80
Government is for solving problems, infrastructure to support the population and to outline rules and laws of society. Government is not for supporting people, it is not supposed to run our lives or our morality...we choose our officials and as citizens we vote. Granted there are some pretty thick headed retarded people who do not understand what that right to vote means and hold your government actually accountable for it's actions. There was nothing wrong with the old law, all this new law is just a power play set up by idiots who deem it a necessity to allow minors to live life making poor decissions and totally bypass the family unit of handling the situation head on. It also presses those that disagree with the problem to pay for what we do not believe in. Basically it is lawless morality that we all pay for because government deems god to be women of birthing age. There is no right or wrong just legalized chaos we not only pay for here but world wide.

 
It makes perfect sense, a woman can be too young to vote, drink, smoke, and not be out past a curfew but is always old enough to kill a baby. She doesn't even need her parents consent because the right of privacy means more than moral structure....

 
I myself would never kill a human, but I also would never kill an animal.Things would change if it was kill or be killed, then yes, I would kill either of them.
say someone was atacking your mother. would you be ok with killing them to save another life? this would just go along with aborting a baby that would cause the death of the mother due to complications.

 
but who is to say I would have to kill the person attacking my mother? Couldn't i just knock them out, or who says my mom wouldn't beat there ***? its not as simple to say kill or not kill, being human we are given many choices in almost every situation.

 
but who is to say I would have to kill the person attacking my mother? Couldn't i just knock them out, or who says my mom wouldn't beat there ***? its not as simple to say kill or not kill, being human we are given many choices in almost every situation.
how many choices would you have if your wife was pregnant and if she proceded with the pregnancy she would more than likely die?

 
well it would leave here to have the kid and die, have the kid and live or have an abortion. now the live or die with having the kid she would have no control over but she could still have the kid if she chose to... and I wouldn't make her chose abortion, its her life and its her choice.

 
but who is to say I would have to kill the person attacking my mother? Couldn't i just knock them out, or who says my mom wouldn't beat there ***? its not as simple to say kill or not kill, being human we are given many choices in almost every situation.
let me be more specific. she is getting ***** at gunpoint by a 6-9 370lb guy. and he tells her and you both that she is going to die when he is done.

you could

a. kill him, which is what i would shoot for lol

b. watch and cheer him on

c. run an hide and cry about it

d. tell your mom to beat his ***

e. try and knock him out and you both die

f. call the police and you both die.

 
well it would leave here to have the kid and die, have the kid and live or have an abortion. now the live or die with having the kid she would have no control over but she could still have the kid if she chose to... and I wouldn't make her chose abortion, its her life and its her choice.
exactly, its her choice. but if it was against the law she wouldnt have a choice. this is one reason i can say i cant agree 100% yes or no.

 
Yeah I see ****, ******, and danger to mother as something different. But I would hope a **** victim would still have the heart to carry out the pregnancy and spare the baby's life.What's scary is this Freedom of Choice Act that's trying to be passed. If I'm not mistaken it will allow minors to get abortions without consent of their parents. Something just doesn't seem right about that to me.
The only thing I don't like about Obama's modification is that it forces doctors to go forth with the procedure. I'd like that only in the instance of the mother's health at risk. If you don't want it because you don't want it...and the dr doesn't believe in them, fine. Go to another doctor and petition your insurance company to drop them. If the doctor cannot find patients because the pro-choicers are on the boards of insurance companies and he goes bankrupt, he will learn to where his moral compass lies.

Fuck the baby im pro choice im just confused how people who are pro life can allow "babymurdering" even if it was against someones will. The baby had no control over that so why should they be killed as a result?
You cannot murder something that isn't alive.

Im pro life and im sure its not the babys choice,and if its ok to kill a very young person,why is it not ok to randomly kill older people?it's all about choices right?
People are pushing for euthanasia (sp?) as well. Random old people do want to die. It is currently illegal to get help killing yourself.

never seen an ultra sound huh?
Doesn't mean it's alive. We have a definition for life. The little thing inside does not meet the generally accepted rules for what is alive.

not to be an asshat about this, but a ***** is alive, **** even your sperm is (arguably) alive before it ever leaves your nut sack.
A sperm is not alive; a ***** is not alive.

In that situation I would vote for A
But I would do my best to stay out of said situation so I wouldn't have to kill anyone.
meh

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

undeadxsunshine

10+ year member
what it is
Thread starter
undeadxsunshine
Joined
Location
York, PA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
191
Views
3,296
Last reply date
Last reply from
nickolas_j_t
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top