5-channel amp

the 4 channel is 67% and the subwoofer channel is 71 % effcient.
Alrighty, using those figures (averaged out to 69%):

14.4V * 80A = 1152W

1152W * 0.69 = 795W

795W / 2 = 397.5W

That's probably going to be about 4x52W + 190W RMS at 4 Ohms.

Out of curiosity, where did you find the efficiency figures?

 
Alrighty, using those figures (averaged out to 69%):
14.4V * 80A = 1152W

1152W * 0.69 = 795W

795W / 2 = 397.5W

That's probably going to be about 4x52W + 190W RMS at 4 Ohms.

Out of curiosity, where did you find the efficiency figures?

Jay Kent

Technicial Director

Powerbass. 909-993-5399

If what you are saying is true( im not doubting you) there are a TON of amps out there "name brand" that are not doing the rated power. THAT SUCKS

 
Jay KentTechnicial Director

Powerbass. 909-993-5399

If what you are saying is true( im not doubting you) there are a TON of amps out there "name brand" that are not doing the rated power. THAT SUCKS
Thanks for the source info.

And yes, it does ****. Which is why the CEA-2006 standard was created and enacted. There's really no good reason for any manufacturer not to adhere to this rating methodology other than to intentionally dupe a consumer out of money.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

stocker08

10+ year member
Not drunk anymore
Thread starter
stocker08
Joined
Location
Minnesota
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
51
Views
3,883
Last reply date
Last reply from
stocker08
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top