..

[Proximity 10+ year member]

The challenger and the camaro both look nearly exactly fucking alike, save a few minor differences. And in saying that, they're both equally ugly as fuck.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

If you can't objectivly say these don't look like two versions of the exact same car, you're fucking retarded. That's all there is to it.

 

[Proximity 10+ year member]

They're also ungody heavy, making the power they make worthless.

 

[Louisiana_CRX 5,000+ posts]

pretty sweet rides....

 

[CobraStang98 10+ year member]

They're also ungody heavy, making the power they make worthless.

The Camaro is an extremely more nimble car than you would expect, much more so than the new challenger for sure. But when buying a muscle car how many people really are worried about the weight //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif Not many people will be taking these autocrossing against like a Lotus or modified miata //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[Ignatowski 5,000+ posts]

I think its ugly as fuk

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

If you can't objectivly say these don't look like two versions of the exact same car, you're fucking retarded. That's all there is to it.

I am just going to throw this out there. But, I think you need to go look in a mirror right quick........

Also drugs are bad...............mmmmmmkay? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[99grandprixGT 5,000+ posts]

If you can't objectivly say these don't look like two versions of the exact same car, you're fucking retarded. That's all there is to it.

they both orange

 

[bunkerking09 10+ year member]

they both orange

well that obviously means its the same car.

duh

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

I saw a $200k super pro street 2010 camaro the other night at the track. It did 4.01 on an 1/8th mile track at 171 or some shit //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif

somehow, now looking at regular ones now makes them seem lame //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[xX J Brutal Xx 10+ year member]

it's mos def my next vehicle purchase

 

[bw_audio 10+ year member]

..

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

If you can't objectivly say these don't look like two versions of the exact same car, you're fucking retarded. That's all there is to it.

They have a similar roof and window lines, and the over all size is similar. But that's nothing new, many of the 'old school' muscle cars of the 60's and 70's where very similar. Chrysler was known for being about 3-5 years behind GM and Ford in styling. If you look at a late 60's to early 70's chargers, the roof and window line is EXTREMELY similar to a 66-67 chevelle. Even the inset back window that was notorious on the chevy models.
You are trying to convince us that anyone who thinks a Chevy and a Chrysler are diff cars is an idiot. You sure you dont want to rethink your stance?

 

[Chris455 10+ year member]

I saw a $200k super pro street 2010 camaro the other night at the track. It did 4.01 on an 1/8th mile track at 171 or some shit //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif
somehow, now looking at regular ones now makes them seem lame //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Was it this one? My cousin sent me the pic as soon as he could. B!tch is bad! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif

 

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

I just seen one here locally, man they are nice...