3 vs 1 sub Opinion needed

rccody816

Junior Member
Current set up is two 12's in a Fox Acoustic Box in an 03 dodge ram under the rear seat. Thinking of making a console box with one 12 with double the air space 1.5 at least.

Would it be possible to keep the two under the seat and the new console sub or should I remove the rear seat sub's because they won't sound "right"?

As they sit now they are getting just under 1 cube per sub which is less than they pobably need but still sound good. Would this be an addition by subtraction senerio?

 
Current set up is two 12's in a Fox Acoustic Box in an 03 dodge ram under the rear seat. Thinking of making a console box with one 12 with double the air space 1.5 at least.
Would it be possible to keep the two under the seat and the new console sub or should I remove the rear seat sub's because they won't sound "right"?

As they sit now they are getting just under 1 cube per sub which is less than they pobably need but still sound good. Would this be an addition by subtraction senerio?
Keeping the under-seat subs along with the new setup would cause problems. Over all to the ear it would likely sound louder, because you have that much more air displacement, but since the subs will be in different sized enclosures they will have a different Q factor, different freq response, and thus the coupled feq response between the two different setups would be erratic and unpredictable. Its a similar situation to trying to run different types or sizes of subs. The only way something like this *might* work effectively is if you used a crossover network that separated the freqs between the two setups, but that would add to the cost and complexity of the system with no obvious benefit, and would potentially still sound worse.

 
Keeping the under-seat subs along with the new setup would cause problems. Over all to the ear it would likely sound louder, because you have that much more air displacement, but since the subs will be in different sized enclosures they will have a different Q factor, different freq response, and thus the coupled feq response between the two different setups would be erratic and unpredictable. Its a similar situation to trying to run different types or sizes of subs. The only way something like this *might* work effectively is if you used a crossover network that separated the freqs between the two setups, but that would add to the cost and complexity of the system with no obvious benefit, and would potentially still sound worse.
This.

Honestly, I think youd be better off stuffing a nice 12" in your console if your worried about output. Or just upgrade the 12's in there now.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Getting a good voltage reading does not mean good power transfer. You could read 13.8v out of a 24 AWG wire. Recheck your amplifier's ground and...
2
198
That would be a function of the harness, not the HU, I think. Have you looked into a Maestro or iData interface? i would check with crutchfield...
12
539
thanks DB, that definitely helps swallowing a $300 price tag 😂 these would essentially be running midbass for me too
12
567
What is your budget? With being exposed to Rain.. I would recommend looking at a marine grade SAS Bazooka for the sub stage
3
664

About this thread

rccody816

Junior Member
Thread starter
rccody816
Joined
Location
Kansas City
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
4
Views
853
Last reply date
Last reply from
brandinooooo
20240604_170857.jpg

metalheadjoe

    Jun 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20240605_200209_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

Dylan27

    Jun 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top