2 12" fi q's or 2 12" re xxx

[HardCoreSound 10+ year member]

http://www.ficaraudio.com

 

[bdawson72 5,000+ posts]

sarcasm>joo

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

2 Q's vs 2 06 XXX's? Well, totally different enclosure sizes, power needs, output potential, insanely different weight/size/mounting depth, and clearly designed for two very different roles... but other than that they compare real well to each other. Great question, awesome thread.

 

[jmoreno150 10+ year member]

well i bought the q's but at the moment talking to someone w/ 05 xxx's so if the price is right imma buys those too compare and make a sale. thanx for the opions tho fellaz.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Oh my bad, 05 XXX's. I own a couple, from what Ive read the Q's should perform similar, minus the xbl^2. Someone correct me if Im wrong.

 

[jmoreno150 10+ year member]

well originally it was between the 06 xxx and the q's .

 

[bdawson72 5,000+ posts]

i wouldve went with the MX actually

 

[jmoreno150 10+ year member]

lol **** i didnt get a chance to study the mx.

ok now will these give me loud clear bass? im from nyc and we never heard of re , or fi so i was just curious and decided to see what this forum was talkin about. hope im not disappointed.

 

[R/T Pimp 10+ year member]

Remember the neo magnet on the mx is not for abusing, it will get hot and stay hot. If you want to beat the sh*t out of a sub get the xxx. I have 3 15 06xxx with 6 Merlin md3d's.