Current events discussion

Which is precisely what right-wingers do.
Are you new?
Umm..
New enough to know that the gay pride parades had a bunch of **** people marching in front of young kids. Are you too old to see that? I don't recall right wingers doing that.

"A credible source that says guns don't go off on their own"? That's trying to prove a negative.
A man as highly educated as yourself should know better.
So, basically, you're saying you couldn't find anything to back up your false argument? I figured that.
Haw about you show me a proof of a gun that spontaneously fired in the complete absence of human intervention, or a physical change of state, such as falling from a height, etc.
I never said a gun will spontaneously go off without being touched. I once had a .22 caliber revolver that would go off if the hammer was cocked and you bumped the gun wrong. It was so bad I ended up getting rid of it.

And yet you tried to defend him by saying his daughter voluntarily went to look at his new gun, at that Glocks are known to just fire on their own.
Were you there? Did you hear the conversation? I don't think her were. So, instead, you do what the libs do and make up your own scenario. I prefer to go by what the boyfriend said, who was actually there, and believe she went willingly.
Any mechanical gun (i.e ALL of them, can be fired unintentionally. It's the nature of the beast.
But to support your argument, show me a gun that has NO possibility of being fired accidentally.
A gun that is 100% fail-safe.
Mfgr and model, please.
Dense much?
I already told you that guns will accidentally go off if handled wrong.

A quick Google search will show this
"Several firearms have gained reputations for dangerous malfunctions or high rates of misfire due to design defects. Top examples include first-generation Taurus pistols (24/7, PT22) that can fire when dropped, Remington 700 rifles with trigger issues, and the SIG Sauer P320, linked to accidental discharges. Other notorious models include the Jennings J-22, Japanese Type 94 Nambu, and early Colt revolving rifles."
At this point, I don't even know WTF you are talking about.
There may be flawed court DECISIONS, but unless they get changed in some way, the flaws are irrelevant.
Do you think the mere existence of a flaw in a court decision simply changes the decision?
So, you do believe the courts can be flawed, but you believe a judge, who hates Trump, will give him a fair trial? Of course you don't believe that happened with Trump. That wouldn't support your argument.
So an accidental discharge means he didn't kill his daughter? Or that the court simply declined to prosecute for negligent homicide, in disregard of the fact that he was drunk & handling a gun, the fact that he pointed the gun at his daughter while drunk, and the fact that he pulled the trigger while drunk, handling a gun, AND pointing it at his daughter?
Accidentally, yes. Purposely, no. Therefore, he should be brought up on 1st degree manslaughter.

If someone did the same but it was to a family member of yours, maybe your kid, would you celebrate the lack of prosecution, and defend the person by saying the gun they had is known to "go off", when the actual occurrence of such is 4/10,000%
So, you are again agreeing the courts are flawed? Of course you do. We are dealing with a Repubican. If it were a democrat, you would be all in agreeance with the courts.

I would hear the story. Would I be mad? Of course I would. Would I think the guy murdered my child, and therefore needs to be brought up on 3rd degree manslaughter? Nope.

If an illegal immigrant killed your family member, would you still push Trump to free him?

The jury was picked by Trump's attorneys. Are you suggesting his attorneys were in on the conspiracy to nail him, or that EVERY possible person that could have been picked for the jury was anti-Trump?
The attorney option seems unlikely.
And so were those cops. Again, the entire system is flawed and can be swayed.

So that leaves a 100% chance that ANY jury pool would convict. Which in turn means that EVERYONE is against Trump. And if EVERYONE is against Trump, then he needs to go.
If you are convicted in a town that is known to hate you, you can bet your chances are not good. It's amazing how all of his court hearings took place in New York. Even when the felonies didn't happen in that state.
What's with you right-wingers, thinking that your opinions, beliefs, feelings, somehow change the facts and reality>
Sorry, you can opine all you want that the court decisions against Trump are invalid. That will NEVER change those decisions.
And if that confuses you, interpret it (as the right-wingers love to say) "F*ck your feelings", because they are 100% irrelevant in the face of facts they my contradict.
You claim we are the ones who avoid facts, but yet, you believe there are more than one gender. You also believe that you make the choices with your body unless your party says they aren't.

I'm not screaming that Trump was falsely accused. I'm taking the court decision and moving on. Unlike you can't seem to move on about Trump being you President.
 
Umm..
New enough to know that the gay pride parades had a bunch of **** people marching in front of young kids. Are you too old to see that? I don't recall right wingers doing that.
A bunch of WHAT people? Are you genuinely too dumb to get around the censor bot?

Tell us you're out of your depth in the argument, without telling us.
So, basically, you're saying you couldn't find anything to back up your false argument? I figured that.
You're asking for a credible source to prove a NEGATIVE?
Yeah, you are DEFINITELY in over your head in pretty much any discussion beyond your favorite flavor of ice cream.
I never said a gun will spontaneously go off without being touched. I once had a .22 caliber revolver that would go off if the hammer was cocked and you bumped the gun wrong. It was so bad I ended up getting rid of it.
Cool. So you are admitting that pretty much any gun can have an accidental firing in the hands of a person.
Why are you asking for proof of the negative, then?
Were you there? Did you hear the conversation? I don't think her were. So, instead, you do what the libs do and make up your own scenario. I prefer to go by what the boyfriend said, who was actually there, and believe she went willingly.
No. YOU were the one who stated that she went in the room to look at his new gun. It went like this: "She went into the room because she wanted to see the new gun her dad bought."
Why did you say it? Were you lying? Were you simply assuming that's what happened?
Dense much?
I already told you that guns will accidentally go off if handled wrong.
No, not really. You said "Some Glocks have had a problem with misfiring. That is a fact and a reason I do not, and will not, own one. Many people have asked that gun to be pulled."
I have yet to see you post what model of gun he killed her with.
Please share that info.
A quick Google search will show this
"Several firearms have gained reputations for dangerous malfunctions or high rates of misfire due to design defects. Top examples include first-generation Taurus pistols (24/7, PT22) that can fire when dropped, Remington 700 rifles with trigger issues, and the SIG Sauer P320, linked to accidental discharges. Other notorious models include the Jennings J-22, Japanese Type 94 Nambu, and early Colt revolving rifles."
Congrats for learning how to use Google?
Which of the "known trouble" guns remained in production as-is, without any recall or corrective action by mfgrs or gunsmiths in general?

Are you suggesting people held on to guns that were known to be problems? That sounds more like an issue of stupidity with the owner, if so.
So, you do believe the courts can be flawed, but you believe a judge, who hates Trump, will give him a fair trial? Of course you don't believe that happened with Trump. That wouldn't support your argument.
Way to show us you know nothing of how our justice system works.
Did you know Trump had representation? Did you you Trump was judged by a jury? Did you know Trump's attorneys picked the jury?
Did you know about the documentary evidence? Do you know anything about the depositions and testimony that occurred?
Accidentally, yes. Purposely, no. Therefore, he should be brought up on 1st degree manslaughter.
"Purposely no"? interesting. Were you there? Did you witness what happened?
How are you able to say "purposely no" when the evidence and testimony of the family suggests otherwise?
So, you are again agreeing the courts are flawed? Of course you do. We are dealing with a Repubican. If it were a democrat, you would be all in agreeance with the courts.

I would hear the story. Would I be mad? Of course I would. Would I think the guy murdered my child, and therefore needs to be brought up on 3rd degree manslaughter? Nope.
That borders on retardation. I sure hope you don't have and never have offspring. No kid deserves a parent who would care so little for them as you just admitted to.
If an illegal immigrant killed your family member, would you still push Trump to free him?
Who am I pushing Trump to free? When have I pushed him to free anyone?
And so were those cops. Again, the entire system is flawed and can be swayed.
I have no idea how you formulated that response to this message:
1772506403581.png

You response has NOTHING to do with what I said.

If you are convicted in a town that is known to hate you, you can bet your chances are not good. It's amazing how all of his court hearings took place in New York. Even when the felonies didn't happen in that state.
That sounds like the plot of a hundred B movies, a'la Roadhouse.

But tell us all, what state did the felonies occur in?
You claim we are the ones who avoid facts, but yet, you believe there are more than one gender. You also believe that you make the choices with your body unless your party says they aren't.
So you DON'T believe there is more than one gender?
Even if I were stupid enough to follow the right-wing OPINION that gender simply means "pen*s" or "vag*na", that would still be at least TWO genders.

But I hate to shock you: Gender is a societal/social construct, not a biological indication of *** organs. It's been that way for centuries, going back to the 1600's, or even earlier.
That's part of why it has a unique name. One that is different from "s*x".
I'm not screaming that Trump was falsely accused. I'm taking the court decision and moving on. Unlike you can't seem to move on about Trump being you President.
And yet you continue to say stupid sh*t like this in defense of him.
Are you actually a child pretending to be a grownup, and playing big boy here? The quote below sure makes it seem that way:
If you are convicted in a town that is known to hate you, you can bet your chances are not good. It's amazing how all of his court hearings took place in New York. Even when the felonies didn't happen in that state.
 
Anybody else remember when gas was $5/gal under Autopen Joe or is that just my imagination?

Here's one for the board: how do you get a liberal to support fascist dictatorships? Have Trump take them down. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Anybody else remember when gas was $5/gal under Autopen Joe or is that just my imagination?

Here's one for the board: how do you get a liberal to support fascist dictatorships? Have Trump take them down. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Anyone else remember the recession under Trump, or was that just my imagination?

Anyone else remember all the promises Trump made, and has failed to deliver on, or was that just my imagination?

Anyone else remember Trump pardoning a bunch of criminals because they supported him? Or was that just my imagination?
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
446,188
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top