Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8921151" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>A bunch of WHAT people? Are you genuinely too dumb to get around the censor bot?</p><p></p><p>Tell us you're out of your depth in the argument, without telling us.</p><p></p><p>You're asking for a credible source to prove a NEGATIVE?</p><p>Yeah, you are DEFINITELY in over your head in pretty much any discussion beyond your favorite flavor of ice cream.</p><p></p><p>Cool. So you are admitting that pretty much any gun can have an accidental firing in the hands of a person.</p><p>Why are you asking for proof of the negative, then?</p><p></p><p>No. YOU were the one who stated that she went in the room to look at his new gun. It went like this: <em>"She went into the room because she wanted to see the new gun her dad bought."</em></p><p>Why did you say it? Were you lying? Were you simply assuming that's what happened? </p><p></p><p>No, not really. You said<em> "Some Glocks have had a problem with misfiring. That is a fact and a reason I do not, and will not, own one. Many people have asked that gun to be pulled."</em></p><p>I have yet to see you post what model of gun he killed her with. </p><p>Please share that info.</p><p></p><p>Congrats for learning how to use Google?</p><p>Which of the "known trouble" guns remained in production as-is, without any recall or corrective action by mfgrs or gunsmiths in general?</p><p></p><p>Are you suggesting people held on to guns that were known to be problems? That sounds more like an issue of stupidity with the owner, if so.</p><p></p><p>Way to show us you know nothing of how our justice system works.</p><p>Did you know Trump had representation? Did you you Trump was judged by a jury? Did you know Trump's attorneys picked the jury?</p><p>Did you know about the documentary evidence? Do you know anything about the depositions and testimony that occurred? </p><p></p><p><em>"Purposely no"</em>? interesting. Were you there? Did you witness what happened?</p><p>How are you able to say "purposely no" when the evidence and testimony of the family suggests otherwise?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That borders on retardation. I sure hope you don't have and never have offspring. No kid deserves a parent who would care so little for them as you just admitted to.</p><p></p><p>Who am I pushing Trump to free? When have I pushed him to free anyone?</p><p></p><p>I have no idea how you formulated that response to this message: </p><p>[ATTACH=full]70849[/ATTACH]</p><p>You response has NOTHING to do with what I said.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That sounds like the plot of a hundred B movies, a'la Roadhouse.</p><p></p><p>But tell us all, what state did the felonies occur in? </p><p></p><p>So you DON'T believe there is more than one gender?</p><p>Even if I were stupid enough to follow the right-wing OPINION that gender simply means "pen*s" or "vag*na", that would still be at least TWO genders.</p><p></p><p>But I hate to shock you: Gender is a societal/social construct, not a biological indication of *** organs. It's been that way for centuries, going back to the 1600's, or even earlier. </p><p>That's part of why it has a unique name. One that is different from "s*x".</p><p></p><p>And yet you continue to say stupid sh*t like this in defense of him.</p><p>Are you actually a child pretending to be a grownup, and playing big boy here? The quote below sure makes it seem that way:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8921151, member: 683408"] A bunch of WHAT people? Are you genuinely too dumb to get around the censor bot? Tell us you're out of your depth in the argument, without telling us. You're asking for a credible source to prove a NEGATIVE? Yeah, you are DEFINITELY in over your head in pretty much any discussion beyond your favorite flavor of ice cream. Cool. So you are admitting that pretty much any gun can have an accidental firing in the hands of a person. Why are you asking for proof of the negative, then? No. YOU were the one who stated that she went in the room to look at his new gun. It went like this: [I]"She went into the room because she wanted to see the new gun her dad bought."[/I] Why did you say it? Were you lying? Were you simply assuming that's what happened? No, not really. You said[I] "Some Glocks have had a problem with misfiring. That is a fact and a reason I do not, and will not, own one. Many people have asked that gun to be pulled."[/I] I have yet to see you post what model of gun he killed her with. Please share that info. Congrats for learning how to use Google? Which of the "known trouble" guns remained in production as-is, without any recall or corrective action by mfgrs or gunsmiths in general? Are you suggesting people held on to guns that were known to be problems? That sounds more like an issue of stupidity with the owner, if so. Way to show us you know nothing of how our justice system works. Did you know Trump had representation? Did you you Trump was judged by a jury? Did you know Trump's attorneys picked the jury? Did you know about the documentary evidence? Do you know anything about the depositions and testimony that occurred? [I]"Purposely no"[/I]? interesting. Were you there? Did you witness what happened? How are you able to say "purposely no" when the evidence and testimony of the family suggests otherwise? That borders on retardation. I sure hope you don't have and never have offspring. No kid deserves a parent who would care so little for them as you just admitted to. Who am I pushing Trump to free? When have I pushed him to free anyone? I have no idea how you formulated that response to this message: [ATTACH type="full" width="664px"]70849[/ATTACH] You response has NOTHING to do with what I said. That sounds like the plot of a hundred B movies, a'la Roadhouse. But tell us all, what state did the felonies occur in? So you DON'T believe there is more than one gender? Even if I were stupid enough to follow the right-wing OPINION that gender simply means "pen*s" or "vag*na", that would still be at least TWO genders. But I hate to shock you: Gender is a societal/social construct, not a biological indication of *** organs. It's been that way for centuries, going back to the 1600's, or even earlier. That's part of why it has a unique name. One that is different from "s*x". And yet you continue to say stupid sh*t like this in defense of him. Are you actually a child pretending to be a grownup, and playing big boy here? The quote below sure makes it seem that way: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
