Holly crap dude!!!
You are so far wacked that you don't even know what you're talking about anymore. I guess I have you so wound up that you forget what you are posting. You are proving our point that libs have lost their minds. Let me remind you of what you were saying. You were saying that it was a court's decision that Trump is a ****** and racist. YOU said that. Now you fail to show proof of your claim. You think you're so damn smart, but ignorance is just spewing from your responses. SHOW ME WHERE A IT WAS A COURT'S DECISION THAT TRUMP IS A ****** AND RACIST!!!
You waited this long, and type all this to say that Slappersister, Esquire told you the definition of a court's decision is a conviction?What my sister said is, "The definition of a Court's Decision is a conviction." Trump was never convicted of being a racist or a ******.
Forget to take your anti-schizo meds?Also, you owe me an apology for spreading lies that I buy cheap Chinese amps.
Um... That is exactly what I was telling you what a court decision was. YOU were saying that you never said he was convicted of being a ****** or racist. But, you were saying it was a court decision. Sooooo.....You waited this long, and type all this to say that Slappersister, Esquire told you the definition of a court's decision is a conviction?
HAHAHAHAHAHA. Did she watch Judge Judy and Law and Order, and thought it made her an attorney? Or did she get her diploma at Hamburger University?
That's freaking hilarious.
decision
In the legal context, a decision is a judicial determination of parties’ rights and obligations reached by a court based on facts and law. A decision can mean either the act of delivering a court’s order or the text of the court’s opinion on the case and the accompanying court order. The text of a decision usually includes a summary of the facts, a discussion of relevant laws, the court’s reasoning of how the law applies to the issues at hand, the court’s holding (or determination on the legal issues of the case) and the court’s orders. The order, usually at the end of the decision, tells the parties to a case or cases something that they should do. Orders can deal with housekeeping matters, such as scheduling, or with something substantive and important, such as whether the case will be dismissed or not. Decision is often used interchangeably with “judgment”, “ruling”, “opinion” and “order”.
Some common uses of the term “decision” in the legal context include:
- “Interlocutory decision”, also called “interlocutory order”, refers to an order settling an intermediate matter while the case is still ongoing. This differs from a final decision which settles all matters of the case.
- “Appealable decision” is an order that can be appealed before a reviewing higher court (a court of appeals)
- “Final decision” or “final judgment” refers to a court’s decision that settles all of the parties’ legal issues in controversy in the court.
- “Decision on the merits” or “judgment on the merits” is a judgment made based on facts and relevant substantive law of the case, rather than on technical or procedural grounds.
![]()
decision
www.law.cornell.edu
You can't even look a definition in order to prevent your "sister" from seeming like a moron? That's pretty pathetic.
No wonder you can't understand why Trump is a racist, rap*st, ****** predator, pathological liar, 34x convicted felon, tax cheat.
It's simply too far over your head to grasp.
I apologize for not seeing your apology. That last statement did say I bought Chinese equipment, but it doesn't say I bought Chinese amps. Also, the guy was talking about PA equipment. The Chinese equipment I bought was an active 18" subwoofer for DJ'ing.Forget to take your anti-schizo meds?
Maybe these were posted by your in-house legal counsel?
View attachment 70381
View attachment 70382
And being right... Above all Rob cares about being right at all times.Dude, there's like millions of them. That's technically impossible for me to do. You're just making excuses at this point. You actually don't care about kids getting graped and killed and human trafficking and organ harvesting and all of that. You care about being a partisan hack. So sad.
US District Judge Alex Tostrud said he was lifting the emergency order he issued the day of Pretti’s shooting that barred various federal investigatory offices from destroying or altering any evidence related to the incident because he had gotten assurances from federal officials that evidence would be properly maintained.
The judge, an appointee of President Donald Trump, had imposed the requirement at the behest of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office after they raised concerns in court that their own investigative efforts into the incident could be undermined absent his intervention.
You think THIS nonsense: "What my sister said is, "The definition of a Court's Decision is a conviction."" is the exact same thing as the legal definition?Um... That is exactly what I was telling you what a court decision was. YOU were saying that you never said he was convicted of being a ****** or racist. But, you were saying it was a court decision. Sooooo.....
You have yet to prove where I said he is a convicted rap*st.Post #26,704
"YOU are saying those things, and claiming I said them. How many times do i have to ask you to prove your accusation, before you actually prove it? Will it help if I ask in all capital letters? OK: PLEASE PROVE TO US ALL THAT I SAID DONALD TRUMP IS A CONVICTED RAPIS. PLEASE PROVIDE A POST"
Post #26,593
"The court says he is a ******. Still butthurt by that decision, "
Post #25,655 (this is your response after I said you having nothing to back up Trump being a ****** and a racist)
"Nothing to back it up except the court decisions. "
Do I need to show you more?
I apologize for not seeing your apology. That last statement did say I bought Chinese equipment, but it doesn't say I bought Chinese amps. Also, the guy was talking about PA equipment. The Chinese equipment I bought was an active 18" subwoofer for DJ'ing.
I posted this a while back.Do we need more proof than this that the legal system is just an extension of the 2 party system? Why did the judge issue either order given that it's already illegal to destroy or alter evidence?