Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8919529" data-attributes="member: 683408"><p>I posted this a while back. </p><p>The fact that it even has to be a consideration says something.</p><p></p><p>But if the DOJ decides not to charge the ICE agents, and considers their investigation "closed", it'd be real easy to make the evidence "go away".</p><p></p><p>Considering both Noem and Trump (and others) immediately posted false/fabricated/contradictory statements about both shootings when video evidence was already available, and ICE agents were confiscating cameras from people on the scene (illegal), I think making it very clear that it's illegal is necessary.</p><p>Let's not forget the ICE agents have been told they have "immunity". With "immunity", destroying evidence is easy peasy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8919529, member: 683408"] I posted this a while back. The fact that it even has to be a consideration says something. But if the DOJ decides not to charge the ICE agents, and considers their investigation "closed", it'd be real easy to make the evidence "go away". Considering both Noem and Trump (and others) immediately posted false/fabricated/contradictory statements about both shootings when video evidence was already available, and ICE agents were confiscating cameras from people on the scene (illegal), I think making it very clear that it's illegal is necessary. Let's not forget the ICE agents have been told they have "immunity". With "immunity", destroying evidence is easy peasy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
