Current events discussion
- Thread starter Jimi77
- Live activity
- Replies 33K
- Views 453K
-
- Tags
- constitutional trump
OP
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
How many of the right-wingers are still crying the name Clinton? That mofo has been out of office for 25 years, and right-wing morons invoke his name to defend a Trump goon of murdering a US citizen, for chrissake.
How many are still crying falsely that Obama ruined the country after the economy collapsed under Bush?
How many are still crying falsely that the 2020 election was "stolen"? F**k, the Orange Idiot himself is still screaming that bullshi*.
It's funny how you morons wanna' have a short memory when history details the major screwups of your party.
I suppose we shouldn't talk about Trump's campaign promises that he has utterly failed on, because those are such old news?
Yeah maybe if we don't talk about things, we can pretend they didn't happen. You know like "If we stop testing right now, we'd have very few cases, if any," regarding COVID.
Head in the sand. Great way to go through life.
The idiots are getting what they voted for. The rest are getting screwed.
As a medical care employee (don't you run a hospital?), you should probably know that the WHO is not a governing body. They don't have the authority to set lockdowns. require vaccines, set healthcare policy.
The insanity is in the Team Right people who believe the lies they hear with all their hearts, imply because it supports their chosen narrative. Instead of using some critical thinking and due diligence, they rely on their feelings.
"DON'T TRUST THE SCIENCE!" - Team Right
I can't imagine even Blowvino believes his own bullshi*
Dana Bash challenged Bovino on the preposterous assertion that Pretti was there to “massacre” law enforcement, and when asked for evidence, he has no answer.
“What you were saying is that he went there to try to stop this law enforcement operation. All of the video that we have seen shows him documenting it with his cell phone, which is a lawful thing to do. And the only time he seemed to interact with law enforcement is when they went after HIM when he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down.”
“Where do you have the evidence to show that he was trying to impede that law enforcement?” asked Bash.
“Dana, first he was there in the scene. He was in the scene actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to — replies Bovino, who gets quickly cut off by Bash before he can continue lying.
“But that's not illegal. wasn't impeding it. was filming it, which is a legal thing to do in the United States of America!” says Bash.
“Now, Dana, don't freeze frame adjudicate this now. He was there for a reason, and that reason was to impede law enforcement to the point.”
“What evidence do you have of that?” asks Bash, again.
“Here's a good point, Dana, is the fact that de-escalation techniques were utilized during this action. Those de-escalation techniques, whether it was physically trying to remove them from that law enforcement scene, that active law enforcement scene in which law enforcement were going after a violent illegal alien, or the use of pepper spray, which is another de-escalation technique, those techniques did not work,” deflects Bovino, who clearly has NO evidence and is again, LYING, as no “de-escalation techniques” were deployed — unless “beating him senseless and shooting him” is a “de-escalation technique for the Trump regime.
“There is no evidence that he was perpetrating violence. And there's no evidence, unless you have it, and we'd love to see it if there is, that he was intending to massacre law enforcement, other than the fact that he was there and he had a gun lawfully,” counters Bash.
“He meant to be there beforehand. Again, Dana, he came there beforehand for a reason,” replies Bovino.
“How do you know that?” asks Bash
“Because he was there.”
But all he was doing was filming and documenting it, which is legal!” protests Bash. “So then what did he do that was illegal?”
“But he cannot assault federal law enforcement when he does that! That's an active law enforcement crime scene that he decided to enter into” says Bovino.
“Where do you see in the video that he was assaulting law enforcement? Because from everything we have seen, law enforcement was assaulting him when he was there trying to help another individual.
Then the argument turns terrifyingly Orwellian. “Dana, law enforcement doesn't assault anyone. Follow the directions of law enforcement. Follow directions of law enforcement in an active crime scene. It's very evident he didn't want to do that. Very evident that the other individuals didn't want to do that. You know, it's too bad the consequences had to be paid because he injected himself into that crime scene. can't say that enough. He made the decision to go there. We didn't make the decision to talk to him.”
Dana Bash challenged Bovino on the preposterous assertion that Pretti was there to “massacre” law enforcement, and when asked for evidence, he has no answer.
“What you were saying is that he went there to try to stop this law enforcement operation. All of the video that we have seen shows him documenting it with his cell phone, which is a lawful thing to do. And the only time he seemed to interact with law enforcement is when they went after HIM when he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down.”
“Where do you have the evidence to show that he was trying to impede that law enforcement?” asked Bash.
“Dana, first he was there in the scene. He was in the scene actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to — replies Bovino, who gets quickly cut off by Bash before he can continue lying.
“But that's not illegal. wasn't impeding it. was filming it, which is a legal thing to do in the United States of America!” says Bash.
“Now, Dana, don't freeze frame adjudicate this now. He was there for a reason, and that reason was to impede law enforcement to the point.”
“What evidence do you have of that?” asks Bash, again.
“Here's a good point, Dana, is the fact that de-escalation techniques were utilized during this action. Those de-escalation techniques, whether it was physically trying to remove them from that law enforcement scene, that active law enforcement scene in which law enforcement were going after a violent illegal alien, or the use of pepper spray, which is another de-escalation technique, those techniques did not work,” deflects Bovino, who clearly has NO evidence and is again, LYING, as no “de-escalation techniques” were deployed — unless “beating him senseless and shooting him” is a “de-escalation technique for the Trump regime.
“There is no evidence that he was perpetrating violence. And there's no evidence, unless you have it, and we'd love to see it if there is, that he was intending to massacre law enforcement, other than the fact that he was there and he had a gun lawfully,” counters Bash.
“He meant to be there beforehand. Again, Dana, he came there beforehand for a reason,” replies Bovino.
“How do you know that?” asks Bash
“Because he was there.”
But all he was doing was filming and documenting it, which is legal!” protests Bash. “So then what did he do that was illegal?”
“But he cannot assault federal law enforcement when he does that! That's an active law enforcement crime scene that he decided to enter into” says Bovino.
“Where do you see in the video that he was assaulting law enforcement? Because from everything we have seen, law enforcement was assaulting him when he was there trying to help another individual.
Then the argument turns terrifyingly Orwellian. “Dana, law enforcement doesn't assault anyone. Follow the directions of law enforcement. Follow directions of law enforcement in an active crime scene. It's very evident he didn't want to do that. Very evident that the other individuals didn't want to do that. You know, it's too bad the consequences had to be paid because he injected himself into that crime scene. can't say that enough. He made the decision to go there. We didn't make the decision to talk to him.”
OP
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
- Thread Starter
- #29,064
I wonder if Somalis are allowed to interfere with Rob's investigations because Orange Man bad or if he just conveniently ignores the fraud because Orange Man bad. Whatever the reason, rest assured it has something to do with Orange Man bad.
Before you leap too far away can you explain why, as a hospital administrator, you thought the WHO has the authority to mandate lockdowns, require vaccines, set healthcare policy?
OP
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
- Thread Starter
- #29,066
Interesting, so ICE is circling these schools but nobody has any footage? ICE is indiscriminately pepper spraying people, but no footage? ICE is detaining US Citizens, but no footage? ICE is pulling over local law enforcement, but no footage? Weird how that works. Does Team Walz question that or do they just accept it because Orange Man bad????
www.pbs.org
'They are circling our schools,' superintendent says after 5-year-old detained by ICE
The ICE operations in the Twin Cities are also affecting children who are caught up in the surge of personnel and detentions. A 5-year-old boy who was held by federal agents is a student in the Columbia Heights School District. Liz Landers discussed the incident with Superintendent Zena Stenvik.
www.pbs.org
A "hospital administrator" who thinks the WHO mandates lockdowns, sets healthcare policy, regulates vaccination requirements, is beyond scary.
An administration that has to release doctored imagery of a crime scene to support their narrative (and then DEFENDS the action) is insane.
And the bootlickers who fall for it are pathetic.
"When we (BBC News) asked the White House to comment on the image they directed us to an X post by deputy communications director Kaelan Dorr.
“Enforcement of the law will continue. The memes will continue. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” Dorr wrote,"
And the bootlickers who fall for it are pathetic.
"When we (BBC News) asked the White House to comment on the image they directed us to an X post by deputy communications director Kaelan Dorr.
“Enforcement of the law will continue. The memes will continue. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” Dorr wrote,"
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Similar threads
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 32,753
- Views
- 452,534
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- ThxOne
