Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8918951" data-attributes="member: 683408">I can't imagine even Blowvino believes his own bullshi*Dana Bash challenged Bovino on the preposterous assertion that Pretti was there to “massacre” law enforcement, and when asked for evidence, he has no answer.“What you were saying is that he went there to try to stop this law enforcement operation. All of the video that we have seen shows him documenting it with his cell phone, which is a lawful thing to do. And the only time he seemed to interact with law enforcement is when they went after HIM when he was trying to help an individual who law enforcement pushed down.”“Where do you have the evidence to show that he was trying to impede that law enforcement?” asked Bash.“Dana, first he was there in the scene. He was in the scene actively impeding and assaulting law enforcement to — replies Bovino, who gets quickly cut off by Bash before he can continue lying.“But that's not illegal. wasn't impeding it. was filming it, which is a legal thing to do in the United States of America!” says Bash.“Now, Dana, don't freeze frame adjudicate this now. He was there for a reason, and that reason was to impede law enforcement to the point.”“What evidence do you have of that?” asks Bash, again.“Here's a good point, Dana, is the fact that de-escalation techniques were utilized during this action. Those de-escalation techniques, whether it was physically trying to remove them from that law enforcement scene, that active law enforcement scene in which law enforcement were going after a violent illegal alien, or the use of pepper spray, which is another de-escalation technique, those techniques did not work,” deflects Bovino, who clearly has NO evidence and is again, LYING, as no “de-escalation techniques” were deployed — unless “beating him senseless and shooting him” is a “de-escalation technique for the Trump regime.“There is no evidence that he was perpetrating violence. And there's no evidence, unless you have it, and we'd love to see it if there is, that he was intending to massacre law enforcement, other than the fact that he was there and he had a gun lawfully,” counters Bash.“He meant to be there beforehand. Again, Dana, he came there beforehand for a reason,” replies Bovino.“How do you know that?” asks Bash“Because he was there.”But all he was doing was filming and documenting it, which is legal!” protests Bash. “So then what did he do that was illegal?”“But he cannot assault federal law enforcement when he does that! That's an active law enforcement crime scene that he decided to enter into” says Bovino.“Where do you see in the video that he was assaulting law enforcement? Because from everything we have seen, law enforcement was assaulting him when he was there trying to help another individual.Then the argument turns terrifyingly Orwellian. “Dana, law enforcement doesn't assault anyone. Follow the directions of law enforcement. Follow directions of law enforcement in an active crime scene. It's very evident he didn't want to do that. Very evident that the other individuals didn't want to do that. You know, it's too bad the consequences had to be paid because he injected himself into that crime scene. can't say that enough. He made the decision to go there. We didn't make the decision to talk to him.”[ATTACH=full]70230[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

Verification

Top

What's new

Forum list