Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Why are we giving away ACA credits when it would clearly be less expensive to create a medicaid premium program. I assume some states might already have such a program. The lefties are just looney toons - Schrodinger's Libs. They're simultaneously against big business, while doing everything they can help prop up their profits. You can't make this shyt up.

What "little business" insurance companies offer lower premiums for HC coverage, than bigger business?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Currently, the biggest difference between the Left and Right is the left has to edit and misrepresent things the right says (ie Charlie Kirk) and outright lie (ie ICE is handcuffing children in the streets) to make Team Red look bad. OTOH, all Team Red has to do to make Team Blue look foolish is let them speak (ie Kamala, Mamdami, Biden). Funny how that works. Ironically, I think Team Blue actually does the edits thinking in the back of their minds "this is why Evil Conservative Person really believes." Kinda like a certain person on here always posts "So you think..."

I don't know if you guys ever watch Andrew Wilson debate liberals, but most the time he just has to say something that triggers them and sit back and let them hang themselves.

BBC Leaders Step Down Following Edited Trump Speech Controversy

BBC director general Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness announced their resignations on Saturday.

www.hollywoodreporter.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The POTUS of "law and order".

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Pretty good point, you can't win an argument against an emotional person with logic.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Example?

That would be you and your post.

I am stating a fact, not an opinion.
Your disdain for facts doesn't change those facts.

It's a fact that they are your opinions.

Now you suggest that the COTUS isn't proof of anything?
Delusional.

Did you form this thought because you don't comprehend?

That is correct now, as it was then.
Learn to read, then read up on COTUS, CFR, statute.

I am curious how you tied my ability to read to statements you made.

Are screenshots of his posts good enough? Or do you think he'll cry "photoshopped!"

What's the point. Again, this is a Trump thread and you made it your personal insult to everyone thread. At what point has your adult political conversation started or will it just continue to be you crying about a man you wish you could be. Envy is a mother fucker ain't it.

You thinking about gay *** again?
Becoming an obsession, huh?
Just do it and get it over with, already.

LOL every time you post I am reminded of your obsession with men.

The only people who would be upset are people who shouldn't matter to you.

Why do they matter to you?

Hmmm, how does my opinion of a person make you do ANYTHING regarding g them?
If I hate a murderer, do you immediately feel you have to like them?
Try some independent thought, for a change.

You made the statement that we "lick his ***". You going to claim it was hypothetical, rhetorical or spin it some other way?

You're asking me to prove YOUR opinion, by proving a negative?

That is your opinion that it is a negative.

Cool. I think there are EBEs living in the lunar lander. Prove there aren't.

Trust me.

Your first ironic paragraph of the day.
Congrats.

Iconic.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That would be you and your post.

As weak as all of your arguments.
Consistently poor.

It's a fact that they are your opinions.

2+2=4
Fact, or opinion?

Did you form this thought because you don't comprehend?

If I repeat COTUS, and you say sardonically that I'm "using COTUS as my proof", then you are suggesting COTUS is bunk.

For the hundredth time: If your words don't convey what you mean, put effort into choosing words that do.

I am curious how you tied my ability to read to statements you made.

You have a really tough time understanding things that are posted here. That speaks to your ability to read, and comprehend.

What's the point. Again, this is a Trump thread and you made it your personal insult to everyone thread. At what point has your adult political conversation started or will it just continue to be you crying about a man you wish you could be. Envy is a mother fucker ain't it.

I have no desire to be a ******, racist, pathological liar, convicted felon, grifter with dementia.

Is that what you want be? Is that why you defend him so much, like a devoted little puppy?

LOL every time you post I am reminded of your obsession with men.

There you go again. Can't help yourself? Go ahead and act on it.
Stay away from kids, though.
The right may think it's OK, but it's really not.

Why do they matter to you?

People who are ********** don't matter to me at all.

You made the statement that we "lick his ***". You going to claim it was hypothetical, rhetorical or spin it some other way?

You don't know what an idiom is, by now?
Ohio, Kentucky, North Carolina, Florida. Not ONE school taught it?

That is your opinion that it is a negative.

Proving something doesn't exist, when it hasn't been proved to exist, is proving a negative.
Are you new?

Trust me.

As far as I could throw your dad's house.

Iconic.

Said no one, besides you.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

As weak as all of your arguments.
Consistently poor.

Good One!

2+2=4
Fact, or opinion?

That depends on who is declaring the sum. You or Donald Trump?

If I repeat COTUS, and you say sardonically that I'm "using COTUS as my proof", then you are suggesting COTUS is bunk.

There was nothing indicating derision in my post. I stated facts. You used the COTUS as your proof. Now, suddenly, if the other side makes a factual statement they are doing so to talk shit huh?

For the hundredth time: If your words don't convey what you mean, put effort into choosing words that do.

Maybe you stop reading into things that give you no reason to interpret them so that you stop ******* up conversations with your assumptions.

You have a really tough time understanding things that are posted here. That speaks to your ability to read, and comprehend.

I'm good. You are the one begging for clarification all the time.

I have no desire to be a ******, racist, pathological liar, convicted felon, grifter with dementia.

Is that your cover story?

Is that what you want be? Is that why you defend him so much, like a devoted little puppy?

lol How often do you think I defend Trump?

There you go again. Can't help yourself? Go ahead and act on it.
Stay away from kids, though.
The right may think it's OK, but it's really not.

Easy there fella... you are literally on team "groom the kids".

People who are ********** don't matter to me at all.

Because only Homosexuals are people? Wow... that an odd stand to take.

You don't know what an idiom is, by now?
Ohio, Kentucky, North Carolina, Florida. Not ONE school taught it?

Florida and Ohio. I probably know better than you do about most words.

Proving something doesn't exist, when it hasn't been proved to exist, is proving a negative.
Are you new?

Now you are off on a different topic.

As far as I could throw your dad's house.

I asked if he wanted to buy it he said no.

Said no one, besides you.

Ironic

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Good One!

That depends on who is declaring the sum. You or Donald Trump?

The sad part is you are only pretending to be facetious.

There was nothing indicating derision in my post. I stated facts. You used the COTUS as your proof. Now, suddenly, if the other side makes a factual statement they are doing so to talk shit huh?

"You support illegals and even say they have rights under OUR constitution. The criminal behavior is that of the person being in this country ILLEGALLY. The support of it is you siting it and using the COTUS as your proof."

So, what are you trying to say here? That the COTUS protects all people inside our borders, or that when I quote the COTUS, it's wrong?

Maybe you stop reading into things that give you no reason to interpret them so that you stop ******* up conversations with your assumptions.

"Reading into things". Do you mean taking words as they are defined?
For example: If you say something is illegal (i.e. "It's illegal for POTUS to sell oil from the SPR"), am I "reading into things" by accepting your claim something is illegal?
Should I read it as satire, or sarcasm, or comedy, instead?

I'm good. You are the one begging for clarification all the time.

Proof is not "clarification". If you make a bullshit claim, I'm not looking for you to "clarify" when I ask you to prove your bullshit claim.

For example, it's not a "clarification" I am asking for when I ask for a circuit symbol that shows a mono amp with multiple outputs. It's proof of a claim that I am asking for.

Is that your cover story?

Cover for what? That I don't support and defend a ******, racist, ****** predator, convicted felon, impeached grifter, pathological liar?

I'm proud of that. Why would I want to hide the fact that I don't support or defend that piece of garbage?

lol How often do you think I defend Trump?

Pretty much any time it's shown here what trash he is.
So...a LOT.

Easy there fella... you are literally on team "groom the kids".

Says the guy on team Guardians Of **********.
How quickly do they hand babies off to the priest, for the grooming and indoctrination to begin? A month? Two?

Because only Homosexuals are people? Wow... that an odd stand to take.

Another failure of logic on your part.
Racists have no value to me, either. But, we were discussing homosexuality, not racism.

Florida and Ohio. I probably know better than you do about most words.

No school in Kentucky or North Carolina?

You didn't even know what "In your wheelhouse" meant.
You think it's proper to use "an" before a word beginning with a consonant.
You are still baffled by what irony is.
You think "in" means "passing through".
You think "tautology" means one person repeating another's words.

And you think you are an expert in the language?
Maybe an expert in the few things you know. Sorry, having strong but limited knowledge does NOT make you an expert. Knowing your times tables by heart doesn't make you a mathematician.

Now you are off on a different topic.

Nah, that still has to do with you asking me to disprove one of your claims. One that has never been proved to begin with.
Did you get overwhelmed again?

I asked if he wanted to buy it he said no.

So he just rents it from the actual owner?
No inheritance for you.

Ironic

Not really. It's pretty much expected that no one would repeat what you say.
Irony typically signifies the opposite of what is expected.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The sad part is you are only pretending to be facetious.

"You support illegals and even say they have rights under OUR constitution. The criminal behavior is that of the person being in this country ILLEGALLY. The support of it is you siting it and using the COTUS as your proof."

So, what are you trying to say here? That the COTUS protects all people inside our borders, or that when I quote the COTUS, it's wrong?

"Reading into things". Do you mean taking words as they are defined?
For example: If you say something is illegal (i.e. "It's illegal for POTUS to sell oil from the SPR"), am I "reading into things" by accepting your claim something is illegal?
Should I read it as satire, or sarcasm, or comedy, instead?

Proof is not "clarification". If you make a bullshit claim, I'm not looking for you to "clarify" when I ask you to prove your bullshit claim.

For example, it's not a "clarification" I am asking for when I ask for a circuit symbol that shows a mono amp with multiple outputs. It's proof of a claim that I am asking for.

Cover for what? That I don't support and defend a ******, racist, ****** predator, convicted felon, impeached grifter, pathological liar?

I'm proud of that. Why would I want to hide the fact that I don't support or defend that piece of garbage?

Pretty much any time it's shown here what trash he is.
So...a LOT.

Says the guy on team Guardians Of **********.
How quickly do they hand babies off to the priest, for the grooming and indoctrination to begin? A month? Two?

Another failure of logic on your part.
Racists have no value to me, either. But, we were discussing homosexuality, not racism.



No school in Kentucky or North Carolina?

You didn't even know what "In your wheelhouse" meant.
You think it's proper to use "an" before a word beginning with a consonant.
You are still baffled by what irony is.
You think "in" means "passing through".
You think "tautology" means one person repeating another's words.

And you think you are an expert in the language?
Maybe an expert in the few things you know. Sorry, having strong but limited knowledge does NOT make you an expert. Knowing your times tables by heart doesn't make you a mathematician.



Nah, that still has to do with you asking me to disprove one of your claims. One that has never been proved to begin with.
Did you get overwhelmed again?

So he just rents it from the actual owner?
No inheritance for you.

Not really. It's pretty much expected that no one would repeat what you say.
Irony typically signifies the opposite of what is expected.

Wow. You really do believe your own bullshit. Just reading from the top how you responded clarifies for me how little you actually understand anything.

Like supporting illegals. Trump is against illegal immigration but because the COTUS says they have some rights and it is in opposition to Trumps views you are ok with illegals being here. You don't even comprehend how stupid that it. They broke the law to get here but since orange man bad, illegals good. You are mentally retarded.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Now you elected yourself thread leader in cumsock991's thread. "Let's all work together" Says the far left liberal. Classic retardation. lol

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I am going to get in my car, pull it out of MY driveway and leave MY house to go get some snacks. You make my dick itch way too much Rob.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Wow. You really do believe your own bullshit. Just reading from the top how you responded clarifies for me how little you actually understand anything.

Like supporting illegals. Trump is against illegal immigration but because the COTUS says they have some rights and it is in opposition to Trumps views you are ok with illegals being here.

Wow. You really believe your own bullshit.
It's interesting how me being agianst Trump doing illegal things means I am OK with illegals being here.

Lemme ask you: If I say I am against cops doing illegal search and seizure, does that mean to you that I am PRO crime?
If I say a cop shouldn't shoot a thief in the back when they are running away, does that mean I am PRO thievery?

You don't even comprehend how stupid that it. They broke the law to get here but since orange man bad, illegals good. You are mentally retarded.

OK. So a guy breaks the law by stealing something. Is it OK for the cops to beat the shit out of him when they catch him with the stolen goods, because orange man good?
How about street racing? Catch him racing, pull him out of car and beat the shit out of him, then search the car without consent.
Acceptable because ornage man good, or not acceptable?

Real answers only, please.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Now you elected yourself thread leader in cumsock991's thread. "Let's all work together" Says the far left liberal. Classic retardation. lol

Just trying to support the site. Obviously something you claim to care about, but like all your other claims: bullshit.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am going to get in my car, pull it out of MY

driveway and leave MY

house to go get some snacks. You make my dick itch way too much Rob.

Now I make your dick itch? How VERY "hetero" of you.