Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8912935" data-attributes="member: 683408">The sad part is you are only pretending to be facetious.&quot;You support illegals and even say they have rights under OUR constitution. The criminal behavior is that of the person being in this country ILLEGALLY. The support of it is you siting it and using the COTUS as your proof.&quot;So, what are you trying to say here? That the COTUS protects all people inside our borders, or that when I quote the COTUS, it&#039;s wrong?&quot;Reading into things&quot;. Do you mean taking words as they are defined?For example: If you say something is illegal (i.e. &quot;It&#039;s illegal for POTUS to sell oil from the SPR&quot;), am I &quot;reading into things&quot; by accepting your claim something is illegal?Should I read it as satire, or sarcasm, or comedy, instead?Proof is not &quot;clarification&quot;. If you make a bullshit claim, I&#039;m not looking for you to &quot;clarify&quot; when I ask you to prove your bullshit claim.For example, it&#039;s not a &quot;clarification&quot; I am asking for when I ask for a circuit symbol that shows a mono amp with multiple outputs. It&#039;s proof of a claim that I am asking for.Cover for what? That I don&#039;t support and defend a ******, racist, ****** predator, convicted felon, impeached grifter, pathological liar?I&#039;m proud of that. Why would I want to hide the fact that I don&#039;t support or defend that piece of garbage?Pretty much any time it&#039;s shown here what trash he is.So...a LOT.Says the guy on team Guardians Of **********.How quickly do they hand babies off to the priest, for the grooming and indoctrination to begin? A month? Two?Another failure of logic on your part.Racists have no value to me, either. But, we were discussing homosexuality, not racism.No school in Kentucky or North Carolina?You didn&#039;t even know what &quot;In your wheelhouse&quot; meant. You think it&#039;s proper to use &quot;an&quot; before a word beginning with a consonant.You are still baffled by what irony is.You think &quot;in&quot; means &quot;passing through&quot;.You think &quot;tautology&quot; means one person repeating another&#039;s words.And you think you are an expert in the language?Maybe an expert in the few things you know. Sorry, having strong but limited knowledge does NOT make you an expert. Knowing your times tables by heart doesn&#039;t make you a mathematician. Nah, that still has to do with you asking me to disprove one of your claims. One that has never been proved to begin with.Did you get overwhelmed again?So he just rents it from the actual owner?No inheritance for you. Not really. It&#039;s pretty much expected that no one would repeat what you say.Irony typically signifies the opposite of what is expected.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8912935, member: 683408"] The sad part is you are only pretending to be facetious. [I]"You support illegals and even say they have rights under OUR constitution. The criminal behavior is that of the person being in this country ILLEGALLY. The support of it is you siting it and using the COTUS as your proof."[/I] So, what are you trying to say here? That the COTUS protects all people inside our borders, or that when I quote the COTUS, it's wrong? "Reading into things". Do you mean taking words as they are defined? For example: If you say something is illegal (i.e. "It's illegal for POTUS to sell oil from the SPR"), am I "reading into things" by accepting your claim something is illegal? Should I read it as satire, or sarcasm, or comedy, instead? Proof is not "clarification". If you make a bullshit claim, I'm not looking for you to "clarify" when I ask you to prove your bullshit claim. For example, it's not a "clarification" I am asking for when I ask for a circuit symbol that shows a mono amp with multiple outputs. It's proof of a claim that I am asking for. Cover for what? That I don't support and defend a ******, racist, ****** predator, convicted felon, impeached grifter, pathological liar? I'm proud of that. Why would I want to hide the fact that I don't support or defend that piece of garbage? Pretty much any time it's shown here what trash he is. So...a LOT. Says the guy on team Guardians Of **********. How quickly do they hand babies off to the priest, for the grooming and indoctrination to begin? A month? Two? Another failure of logic on your part. Racists have no value to me, either. But, we were discussing homosexuality, not racism. No school in Kentucky or North Carolina? You didn't even know what "In your wheelhouse" meant. You think it's proper to use "an" before a word beginning with a consonant. You are still baffled by what irony is. You think "in" means "passing through". You think "tautology" means one person repeating another's words. And you think you are an expert in the language? Maybe an expert in the few things you know. Sorry, having strong but limited knowledge does NOT make you an expert. Knowing your times tables by heart doesn't make you a mathematician. Nah, that still has to do with you asking me to disprove one of your claims. One that has never been proved to begin with. Did you get overwhelmed again? So he just rents it from the actual owner? No inheritance for you. Not really. It's pretty much expected that no one would repeat what you say. Irony typically signifies the opposite of what is expected. [/QUOTE]

Verification