Like I said it's just shitty politicians pandering to lobbyists...lol they'll kill us before they kill the data centers
Like I said it's just shitty politicians pandering to lobbyists...lol they'll kill us before they kill the data centers
Well, ai is the new war, new manhattan project. Just like Oppenheimer and the nuclear bomb during ww2, whoever wins ai wins ww3.Like I said it's just shitty politicians pandering to lobbyists...
Maybe but passing peak pricing is just politicians being garbage as usualWell, ai is the new war, new manhattan project. Just like Oppenheimer and the nuclear bomb during ww2, whoever wins ai wins ww3.
This is what I mean:Maybe but passing peak pricing is just politicians being garbage as usual
That has nothing to do with local electricity pricing...This is what I mean:
"Nov 19 (Reuters) - A U.S. congressional commission on Tuesday proposed a Manhattan Project-style initiative to fund the development of AI systems that will be as smart or smarter than humans, amid intensifying competition with China over advanced technologies."
I disagree; there's a race to win ai and ai data centers are taking huge amounts of electricity (and water) away from people. States and local areas, in order for the whole nation to keep an edge on ai, they need to restrict the average persons electricity usage to win the ai war vs china.That has nothing to do with local electricity pricing...
So instead of tens of millions of people dying, they battle with computers?Well, ai is the new war, new manhattan project. Just like Oppenheimer and the nuclear bomb during ww2, whoever wins ai wins ww3.
there is a huge push to build nuclear reactors to power ai data centers, like 3 mile island nuclear, small modular nuclear reactor tech (SMR) has been developed or talked about a lot in relation to power ai data centers. I mean trump did the ai stargate agreement early onThat has nothing to do with local electricity pricing...
If there was a serious AI push, there'd be a corresponding push to increase production capacity to supply the power needs...until there's a serious push (not renewables) for power plant construction then you can take the AI push seriously.
The federal government has the ability to easily fast track permits and construction on the basis of national security but that isn't happening...so far it's nothing but lip service from the white house on this
www.forbes.com
Small scale reactors aren't new tech and there's no realistic push to build plants in general (of any kind). The feds have plenty of tools to fast track building and permits but nothing is being done beyond lip service. There's talk and meaningless bills but zero actual action...so no local peak pricing has nothing to do with ai...you're giving shitty politicians way too much credit herethere is a huge push to build nuclear reactors to power ai data centers, like 3 mile island nuclear, small modular nuclear reactor tech (SMNR) has been developed or talked about a lot in relation to power ai data centers. I mean trump did the ai stargate agreement early on
It's not new tech...this is stuff that could've been built a decade ago...yet there's no shovels in the dirt"Small modular reactors (SMRs) are poised to become the backbone of AI infrastructure, with tech giants committing over $10 billion to nuclear partnerships and 22 gigawatts of projects in development globally. The first commercial SMR-powered data centers will come online by 2030, marking a pivotal shift in how we power the digital economy. This convergence of nuclear technology and artificial intelligence addresses a critical challenge: AI data centers will consume 945 terawatt-hours annually by 2030—equivalent to the entire electricity consumption of Japan—while demanding 24/7 carbon-free power that only nuclear can reliably provide."
![]()
SMRs Power AI: $10B Nuclear Data Center Revolution
Tech giants commit $10B+ to small modular reactors for AI data centers. First SMR facilities online by 2030 to meet AI's 945 TWh energy demand.introl.com
![]()
Google bets big on 'mini' nuclear reactors to feed its AI demands
Google says the agreement could 'unlock the full potential of AI for everyone.'www.popsci.com
I'm not saying it's new. All I'm saying is the availability of electricity is becoming less and the price of electricity is becoming more because of the rapid expansion of ai data centers. So when any politician tries to limit electricity usage during a race to build ai, I can't help but assume ai is actually the end game reason. Like the push for smart homes and smart appliances, it's all the same thing IMO.It's not new tech...this is stuff that could've been built a decade ago...yet there's no shovels in the dirt
The "race" is all talk at this point...if it was real thing there'd be a push to build infrastructure.I'm not saying it's new. All I'm saying is the availability of electricity is becoming less and the price of electricity is becoming more because of the rapid expansion of ai data centers. So when any politician tries to limit electricity usage during a race to build ai, I can't help but assume ai is actually the end game reason. Like the push for smart homes and smart appliances, it's all the same thing IMO.
Says the guy who thinks he owns a house, carries a gun, and is going somewhere in life.You have to forgive Rob... he is confused a lot.
I don't understand what you mean when you say there isn't a push already to build infrastructure....The "race" is all talk at this point...if it was real thing there'd be a push to build infrastructure.
Right now it's like saying there's a race to produce ammunition while working with a limited supply of powder...it's just some to look good on