Current events discussion

IMG_8260.jpeg



1753406235228.png


signal-2025-07-24-210734.jpeg


IMG_9143.jpeg


IMG_9142.jpeg


1753406476786.jpeg


IMG_9149.jpeg



"In physics and engineering, magnetohydrodynamics is a model of electrically conducting fluids that treats all interpenetrating particle species together as a single continuous medium. It is primarily concerned with the low-frequency, large-scale, magnetic behavior in plasmas and liquid metals and has applications in multiple fields including space physics, geophysics, astrophysics, and engineering."


👁️

@Eggs this is like the theory of the Nazi Bell, where they had extremely high speed counter rotating magnets made the bell levitate itself, supposedly.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 66680


View attachment 66687

View attachment 66682

View attachment 66683

View attachment 66684

View attachment 66688

View attachment 66686


"In physics and engineering, magnetohydrodynamics is a model of electrically conducting fluids that treats all interpenetrating particle species together as a single continuous medium. It is primarily concerned with the low-frequency, large-scale, magnetic behavior in plasmas and liquid metals and has applications in multiple fields including space physics, geophysics, astrophysics, and engineering."


👁️

@Eggs this is like the theory of the Nazi Bell, where they had extremely high speed counter rotating magnets made the bell levitate itself, supposedly.


IMG_9150.jpeg



"The Philadelphia Experiment is often linked to Nikola Tesla due to claims that it involved advanced technology, possibly related to his theories on electromagnetism. However, the U.S. Navy has stated that the experiment is a hoax and that no such technology was ever developed or tested."

The navy says no advanced EM tech? Lulz 😆

 

View attachment 66693


"The Philadelphia Experiment is often linked to Nikola Tesla due to claims that it involved advanced technology, possibly related to his theories on electromagnetism. However, the U.S. Navy has stated that the experiment is a hoax and that no such technology was ever developed or tested."

The navy says no advanced EM tech? Lulz 😆

Torsion/toroidal field fyi:

1753408303640.png

IMG_9151.jpeg

1753408447716.jpeg

IMG_9153.gif
IMG_9152.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Yep. They are the same. Tow a 7,000 load with your Escape.
Do I have an Escape?
You are incapable of admitting you screwed up, even when your own posts are shown to be contradictory.
So what you are saying then is that I have never screwed up. Word!
You get triggered all the time when you get proved wrong. Like a spoiled, entitled child.
So....... what are my triggers?
"Run" Pioneer. 🙄
I'm not on the competition circuit, like you are with your factory head unit, Rockford amp and a box.
I just have a head unit, amp and subs.
And as simple as my system is, you couldn't offer anything useful to answer my question about a line-level attenuator.
Says the guy who claims to have owned a shop but was asking people with intermediate skills for help.
Kind of like claiming I somehow found invoice information from best Buy that just happens to match the information I gave about my head unit years ago?
Because that happens all the time. Just like me having no memory, and the forum history always providing the info that I needed when i need it. Pure coincidence.
Well technically you did make that claim... you even threw Trump into the mix.
Neither is your portable player. Does it sound good?
It sounds fine.
And? My Pioneer can do 192kHz FLAC files.
Your aptxHD is limited to about half the resolution of my head unit, and god knows what happens when you use your AUX port to play through your stock head unit.
What sample rate does the DSP process at?
The AC DM-608 - Max 96kHz @32bit - Uses the AD1933 192kHz 24bit 8-channel DAC
The RF 3Sixty.3 - 96kHz @32bit - 32bit DAC
The D4S EZY DSP68+ - 48kHz @24bit - 32bit DAC
I'd bet good money that in your car, you couldn't hear the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and a 192kHz FLAC file in a double-blind test, no matter how you are playing it.
You'd lose that money and let's leave it at that. Bruising your ego is not worth my time.
I have done side by side through speakers and IEM's and you can tell the difference between 320mp3's and 96-192kHz FLAC files. Stop trying to flex.
In fact, I'd be glad to send you some files to compare so you could tell us which is which.
I'm sure I already have any files you would send.
And why would you stream via Bluetooth to your DSP if you can use Toslink or SPDIF?
Why? Really? It's an option. If someone has music they want me to hear on their phone they can link up via Bluetooth... seriously Rob, think before you jump to insolence.
 
Last edited:
That's literally what I just said to you but in a more comical and intelligent way 😛

You can't like do what you just did without being lame. Therefore, you are lame. You're not even a productive member of this forum who are you preaching to 😂🤡
"Preaching"?
You mean like hundreds of posts about how AI is going to wipe out mankind to fulfill its own desires?
Or hundreds of posts about how the COVID vax has killed us all?
Maybe hundreds of posts on aliens who are visiting us daily?
 
Do I have an Escape?
Dunno. Do you?
So what you are saying then is that I have never screwed up. Word!
You think contradicting your own posts is not screwing up?
Wow.
So....... what are my triggers?
Getting proved wrong is certianly one.
Says the guy who claims to have owned a shop but was asking people with intermediate skills for help.
Interesting spin, but a fail.
Show me a cut sheet for an inline variable attenuator for a sub amp in the early 1990s.

Well technically you did make that claim... you even threw Trump into the mix.
Actually, it was you that made the claim. But why let the truth get in the way of your narrative?
It sounds fine.

The AC DM-608 - Max 96kHz @24bit
The RF 3Sixty.3 - 96kHz @24bit ? Actually not sure. Can't find this spec anywhere.
The D4S EZY DSP68+ - 42kHz @24bit
I meant the processing, not what it can accept on the digital input.
You'd lose that money and let's leave it at that. Bruising your ego is not worth my time.
I have done side by side through speakers and IEM's and you can tell the difference between 320mp3's and 96-192kHz FLAC files. Stop trying to flex.
Cool. Let's play the game, then.
Name an open-source music file that you are familiar with that's 192kHz.
I'll create 3 versions for the double-blind. You play them on your system, and then tell us which one is which.
We'll figure out a way the answer is online but "locked" until you do the test, so that neither of us can be accused of cheating.

In?

I'm sure I already have any files you would send.

Why? Really? It's an option. If someone has music they want me to hear on their phone they can link up via Bluetooth... seriously Rob, think before you jump to insolence.
Admit it: You were trying to flex about your high-res music playback by telling us about the Bluetooth b/c you thought it was better than FLAC played back directly. It went something like this: "That is a $500+ HiRes audio player and I have 2TB of storage in it for my music that I can plug into my factory head unit, stream via aptXHD to my DSP or send the audio to the DSP via digital coaxial. Full OEM functionality retained and all the HiRes audio I can handle."

Why did you pay $500+ for a $350 music player? Just to brag about the price?
 
Dunno. Do you?
You tell me.
You think contradicting your own posts is not screwing up?
Wow.
You claiming contradictions does not mean contradictions happened. You have this problem with claiming things are happening that never happen.
Getting proved wrong is certianly one.
Why would that trigger me? Getting proved wrong means I have a learning opportunity. Gaining knowledge is not a bad thing. Unless you are a far left weirdo.
Interesting spin, but a fail.
Show me a cut sheet for an inline variable attenuator for a sub amp in the early 1990s.
You weren't begging for help in the 90's.
Actually, it was you that made the claim. But why let the truth get in the way of your narrative?
Wrong again Rob.
I meant the processing, not what it can accept on the digital input.
They are DSP's. I am sure each companies engineers put the appropriate pieces together.
Cool. Let's play the game, then.
Name an open-source music file that you are familiar with that's 192kHz.
I'll create 3 versions for the double-blind. You play them on your system, and then tell us which one is which.
We'll figure out a way the answer is online but "locked" until you do the test, so that neither of us can be accused of cheating.

In?
No. Can you not read? Or is your ego letting you run your mouth again. How many no's do you need to hear before it sinks in? You are up to two so far.
Admit it: You were trying to flex about your high-res music playback by telling us about the Bluetooth b/c you thought it was better than FLAC played back directly. It went something like this: "That is a $500+ HiRes audio player and I have 2TB of storage in it for my music that I can plug into my factory head unit, stream via aptXHD to my DSP or send the audio to the DSP via digital coaxial. Full OEM functionality retained and all the HiRes audio I can handle."

Why did you pay $500+ for a $350 music player? Just to brag about the price?
Wow, you really did get asshurt huh? I mentioned it because I can prove I use it. Not like you claiming to have a Pioneer.

AptXHD - 576kbps @ 24bit and 48kHz. There is nothing wrong with AptXHD.
It does LDAC as well. - 990kbps @ 24bit and 96kHz.
To flex I will be using digital coaxial to pass that music on and yes, it is better than toslink.

Oh and it wasn't $350. I bought it new on Amazon.

FiiO.jpg
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,948
Views
489,124
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top