Current events discussion

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

But, but, but...I'm "right

It is interesting that he seems to be confused by "leather" shrinking vs all the assorted leather goods we've owned collectively not shrinking. This is like the literal vs not literal nick names; such a simple concept, there are tons of everyday real life examples for everyone to see, but the concept still remains beyond his grasp.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

It is interesting that he seems to be confused by "leather" shrinking vs all the assorted leather goods we've owned collectively not shrinking. This is like the literal vs not literal nick names; such a simple concept, there are tons of everyday real life examples for everyone to see, but the concept still remains beyond his grasp.

Anything that contradicts his narrative is wrong and since you find something to "prove" about anything on the innerwebs...he ain't never wrong

Hell I found a Bigfoot database so he's real

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You know what is really sad? Rob has been dragging on the magical shrinking gloves theory for twenty three god damn pages. 23!!! GLOVES!!!!!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Interesting point. So you're assuming that Aris/Isotoner took no measures to prevent their flagship gloves from shrinking? But all the leather products the rest of us have bought over the years we're treated to prevent shrinking? <<<< not rhetorical

"Assuming"? Why would you think I'm "assuming" when the man who was "responsible for the design, manufacturing, production, raw material, sales and marketing of all men's gloves." said VERY clearly that they did NOT take measures to protect the gloves from shrinking?

Here's his testimony on the treatment of the gloves to prevent shrinking. The gloves that OJ wore, and the gloves that were part of the investigation. Aris Lights. A glove that sold a total 200-240 pair across 17 different stores.

I underlined some important words for you.
Exactly what part of this would you interpret as "yes, we took measures to protect the gloves from shrinking"?

MR. COCHRAN: All right. And those gloves, when they were made between the period we talked about, 1982 to 1992, were they in some way shrink-proof?
MR. RUBIN: No.
MR. COCHRAN: Did they have some kind of treatment to keep them from shrinking?
MR. RUBIN: No.
MR. COCHRAN: The manufacturer? Not at all?
MR. RUBIN: Not at all.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You know what is really sad? Rob has been dragging on the magical shrinking gloves theory for twenty three god damn pages. 23!!! GLOVES!!!!!

I guess you didn't notice that Jimi has been matching me post-for-post (possibly more) on the discussion?
But that's OK becasue he is taking the contrary stance to me, right?

Goddamn, you are inconsistent.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You libs were taking a big dump on 'merica before the Evil Orange King retook his place on the throne.

Cool.
Details, or just a personal belief you felt like expressing?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I guess you didn't notice that Jimi has been matching me post-for-post (possibly more) on the discussion?
But that's OK becasue he is taking the contrary stance to me, right?

Goddamn, you are inconsistent.

He gets a pass because he is open minded.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He gets a pass because he is open minded.

Yeah, so you're a typical hypocrite.
Got it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yeah, so you're a typical hypocrite.
Got it.

I'd ask you to explain that but I am sure it doesn't make sense to you either.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'd ask you to explain that but I am sure it doesn't make sense to you either.

SInce you are unable to comprehend even the simplest concepts, I WILL explain it to you:

hypocrisy - the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense

You ***** about me doing something as if it really bothers you, but then immediately give a pass to someone else who is doing the same thing.
So your complaint is bullshit, which means you are a hypocrite AND liar.

Is that clear enough, or were the words too big?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

SInce you are unable to comprehend even the simplest concepts, I WILL explain it to you:

hypocrisy - the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense

You ***** about me doing something as if it really bothers you, but then immediately give a pass to someone else who is doing the same thing.
So your complaint is bullshit, which means you are a hypocrite AND liar.

Is that clear enough, or were the words too big?

Well allow me to retort. I know what the hell the definition is dummy. I literally said he gets a pass because he is open minded. Who cares if he is doing the same thing? It's a conversation. There is no hypocrisy in having a conversation. You however are closed minded and are literally just arguing your narrow minded view. For 23 pages.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Did they ask the expert in the trial if the gloves were designed to shrink if they got wet?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

For ***** sake... if they were O.J.'s gloves he would have normally worn them on his skin. Hands sweat. Skin sheds. They would have had undeniable proof of O.J.'s DNA in those gloves. He was found innocent so case closed. Just like when Trump was convicted of "****** abuse" and "defamation". The verdict was in and the case is closed. Right? Or are you going to claim you know better than the judge in the OJ case. You think he was guilty and the judge got it wrong because that is the stance you took... guilty.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

"Assuming"? Why would you think I'm "assuming" when the man who was "responsible for the design, manufacturing, production, raw material, sales and marketing of all men's gloves." said VERY clearly that they did NOT take measures to protect the gloves from shrinking?

Here's his testimony on the treatment of the gloves to prevent shrinking. The gloves that OJ wore, and the gloves that were part of the investigation. Aris Lights. A glove that sold a total 200-240 pair across 17 different stores.

I underlined some important words for you.
Exactly what part of this would you interpret as "yes, we took measures to protect the gloves from shrinking"?

MR. COCHRAN: All right. And those gloves, when they were made between the period we talked about, 1982 to 1992, were they in some way shrink-proof?
MR. RUBIN: No.
MR. COCHRAN: Did they have some kind of treatment to keep them from shrinking?
MR. RUBIN: No.
MR. COCHRAN: The manufacturer? Not at all?
MR. RUBIN: Not at all.

Doesn't make it so. He also says the gloves aren't "disposable" and would be expected to shrink exposed to a wet Northeastern winter. He also said 3ml of liquid caused 15% shrinkage.
Would you like me to quote the others that lied on the stand in this case? Do you really believe Isotoner doesn't treat their expensive flagship gloves? Some people think critically, other's just think "that fits my world view and therefore is true."

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Well allow me to retort. I know what the hell the definition is dummy. I literally said he gets a pass because he is open minded. Who cares if he is doing the same thing? It's a conversation. There is no hypocrisy in having a conversation. You however are closed minded and are literally just arguing your narrow minded view. For 23 pages.

Yet another deflection, and a poor one at that.
In just two posts, you proved you are a hypocrite and a liar.
Good work.