Current events discussion

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I bet communist Robocops aren't friendly

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Fed-up NJ sheriff sends own drone to follow mystery flying objects — what happened left some ‘stunned’

The Ocean County Sheriff’s office sent its own “industrial grade” drone into the air Thursday.

nypost.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It would certainly expose "sleeper" type cells.

I support kicking some cartel bootie.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Actually, it does. The decision exists regardless of the motivation of the judge

Yes and the decision was ****** abuse...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Hey, what do you guys think about Trumps comments on the Mexican cartels?

I think they should've been labeled terrorist groups 10 maybe 20 years ago and dealt with accordingly

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/politics/joe-biden-commutations-pennsylvania-illinois/index.html

Guess biden is just pardoning anyone that might take the heat off the hunter pardon he lied about...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I bet this has everything to do with the mysterious drones here and in Europe:

NATO Head Says “Wartime Mindset” Needed; Redirect “Pensions, Health, Social Security” To Military Spending

“Freedom does not come for free.”

modernity.news

Marjorie Taylor Greene says government "in control" of New Jersey drones

The drones have been sighted in New Jersey and New York since mid-November, but the FBI says it does not know who is responsible.

www.newsweek.com

Schools Using AI to Send Police to Students' Homes

Schools are employing dubious AI-powered software to accuse teenagers of wanting to harm themselves — and sending the police to their homes.

futurism.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So you dislike me enough that you will back up ThxOne when he lies and claims I "misquoted" him in my sig line?
OK, let's run with it.
1. Show me where I offered any explanation of what his words meant.
2. Show me where any of the words in quotation marks were not a verbatim, word-for-word, exact copy, of the words he originally typed in his post.

The words mean the same thing with or without the "Your". An average that is derived from a set of numbers is not "mine" in any way. It is a mathematical certainty. The calculation to find an average is also not "mine" in any way.
Additionally, he was describing an average reached by adding 2 and 3 together, and dividing by 2.
Neither 2 nor 3 are "mine", nor is the calculation.
"Your" matters not a whit with regards to the verbatim quote in my sig line.
Should we get into the fact that he felt the need to explain people don't get "half a child" when the average number of children in a home is not a whole number?
View attachment 62046

And was talking about averages and math in general. He clarified it here:
"That is YOUR spin on what I post. What I post is that math can ALSO be used nefariously."

Since you can't bullshit me you try to bullshit Buck. Nice. When you omit words, change words you change the meaning. You know what yo were doing when you did it and you do it all the time. I voiced this as one of my concerns about your job too. How context matters and proper quoting. I am certain the way you relay information has cause undue prosecution of innocent people.

Actually, it does. The decision exists regardless of the motivation of the judge, the jury, the failure of Trump's attorneys to hire ThxOne for his stellar defense capabilities, the day of week the decisions occurred, the phase of the moon, the color of the carpet in the judge's chamber.

Apparently I would have asked questions that did not get asked and I would have had the jury thinking.

Unless the decision is changed or overturned, the decision is locked in. Nobody's personal opinion changes that.
Just like ThxOne's personal opinion doesn't change the definitions of "in", or "irony", "tautology", or "verbatim".

Not my personal opinions Rob.

I posted a link to the legal decision several times, with quotes taken directly from within the decision itself. The quotes from that decision indicate that Trump is legally considered a ****** by court decision.
I posted this after calling him a ******, and Spokey challenged my use of the word.

Did you post a **** conviction?

He wanted proof. I gave him proof. And then he spent a ton of posts trying to spin out of the reality of the legal decision. But he never showed that the decision was changed of overturned.
So it stands.

You gave him what you accept as proof and when it comes to bashing Trump you don't need much if any.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yes and the decision was ****** abuse...

Point out to me where, in this quote form the hearing DECISION, you see "****** abuse".
The judge VERY clearly says it was ****:
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
I'll repeat the important part about the ****, in case the sheer quantity of words overwhelmed you: the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that

Are you going to prove the decision that includes the above text was changed or overturned?
Until you do, all of your blathering means nothing.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Since you can't bullshit me you try to bullshit Buck. Nice. When you omit words, change words you change the meaning. You know what yo were doing when you did it and you do it all the time. I voiced this as one of my concerns about your job too. How context matters and proper quoting. I am certain the way you relay information has cause undue prosecution of innocent people.

Buck decided to join in. Since he decided to be part of the fun, he gets the opportunity to support your lie that I "misquoted" you.
Proper quoting means that the words inside the quotation marks have not been changed from the original words. No substitutions. No change of placement.
My quote contains no substitutions. My quote does not change the placement of your words.
It is not a "misquote" in any way, so your accusation is a lie.

Apparently I would have asked questions that did not get asked and I would have had the jury thinking.

And if pigs had wings, they would probably fly. That doesn't change the fact that they do not fly.

Not my personal opinions Rob.

You think you are not "in" your car when you are driving it, because you are not "attached" to it.
Yeah, that's an OPINION. A ridiculous and incorrect one.
Here's a verbatim quote of all the words you had in the post:
"This is why people like you should not quote or have access to medical information. You lack the knowledge to understand it in it's simplest forms. So you just quote it. Moving on.

If I am driving a car I am passing through as I am not attached to it or a part of it."

Lemme guess: It's a misquote or "taken out of context"?
Heh.

Did you post a **** conviction?

I posted a court hearing decision that says he ***** her.
Have you seen that decision changed or overturned?
Did you file an appeal? Yours would be very brief, I'm sure: "Your Honor, this is bullshit. She's a liar. I await your decision, ThxOne; Esq."

You gave him what you accept as proof and when it comes to bashing Trump you don't need much if any.

Coming from the guy who wouldn't believe his own daughter was ***** unless he was able to watch the guy jam it in her, but is convinced Biden broke the law by selling oil from the SPR.

You change your standards at the drop of a hat to suit your needs.

So, have you found proof yet that the hearing decision was changed or reversed?
Post it here. Remember: Google will find your answers for you so you don't have to know anything.
Go ask Google and share the proof here.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Point out to me where, in this quote form the hearing DECISION, you see "****** abuse".
The judge VERY clearly says it was ****:
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
I'll repeat the important part about the ****, in case the sheer quantity of words overwhelmed you: the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that

Are you going to prove the decision that includes the above text was changed or overturned?
Until you do, all of your blathering means nothing.

When E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump went to trial last spring over her ****** assault allegations, a nine-person civil jury found that Trump sexually abused her but that she failed to prove he ***** her.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

When E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump went to trial last spring over her ****** assault allegations, a nine-person civil jury found that Trump sexually abused her but that she failed to prove he ***** her.

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

Show me that the hearing decision containing the above text was changed, reversed, modified, rewritten, overturned, or in some way is no longer what it was when initially issued.

Google finds all answers for you, right?
Just say "Google, prove the hearing decision is different". It will find it for you immediately.
I'll wait.

Countdown to another failure to prove your claims...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Buck decided to join in. Since he decided to be part of the fun, he gets the opportunity to support your lie that I "misquoted" you.
Proper quoting means that the words inside the quotation marks have not been changed from the original words. No substitutions. No change of placement.
My quote contains no substitutions. My quote does not change the placement of your words.
It is not a "misquote" in any way, so your accusation is a lie.

Stop crying Rob. You claimed to have quoted me verbatim. You did not. You lied.

And if pigs had wings, they would probably fly. That doesn't change the fact that they do not fly.

Having wings does not mean the ability to fly.

You think you are not "in" your car when you are driving it, because you are not "attached" to it.
Yeah, that's an OPINION. A ridiculous and incorrect one.
Here's a verbatim quote of all the words you had in the post:
"This is why people like you should not quote or have access to medical information. You lack the knowledge to understand it in it's simplest forms. So you just quote it. Moving on.

Very good. So you understand what a verbatim quote is which means you left out the word YOUR on purpose.

If I am driving a car I am passing through as I am not attached to it or a part of it."

Lemme guess: It's a misquote or "taken out of context"?
Heh.

Could be.

I posted a court hearing decision that says he ***** her.
Have you seen that decision changed or overturned?
Did you file an appeal? Yours would be very brief, I'm sure: "Your Honor, this is bullshit. She's a liar. I await your decision, ThxOne; Esq."

Why do you let life trigger you so easily?

Coming from the guy who wouldn't believe his own daughter was ***** unless he was able to watch the guy jam it in her, but is convinced Biden broke the law by selling oil from the SPR.

Facts and Proof not word of mouth.

You change your standards at the drop of a hat to suit your needs.

Pot... Kettle....

So, have you found proof yet that the hearing decision was changed or reversed?
Post it here. Remember: Google will find your answers for you so you don't have to know anything.
Go ask Google and share the proof here.

I am not looking for any information.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It should be REAL EASY for you to find the actual **** adjudication to show us then.