Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The court decision says he's a ******. That can be determined in civil court, bud.
If you want to dispute that, you have to take it up with the court, otherwise the decision has not changed.

The words quoted verbatim in the sig line described an average as being only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers, or for nefarious means.
Is there something in my signature that is an attempt to change the meaning of those words?
I fail to see the misquote.

Oh, ok... so by posting that in your sig you are saying that I am saying an average is only useful for lazy PEOPLE... not person, right?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Oh, ok... so by posting that in your sig you are saying that I am saying an average is only useful for lazy PEOPLE... not person, right?

Huh? You offered my signature line as proof that I misquoted YOU specifically.
The quote is verbatim from one of your own posts.
WHERE is the "misquote"?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

The court decision says he's a ******

No the judge said that...the court decision didn't say that...

And again since you're slow on the uptake...a civil court has a far lower burden of proof since the outcome typically involves money over freedom...**** is a felony...so show me a superior court document that Trump was even charged with ****...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Huh? You offered my signature line as proof that I misquoted YOU specifically.
The quote is verbatim from one of your own posts.
WHERE is the "misquote"?

Oh it's on its way.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You crying is how this whole pointless conversation started—from you being butthurt.

Tell yourself whatever you need to so you don’t feel like you backed yourself into a corner, but we both know you did. You can’t prove that AI needs humanity indefinitely, which is why you keep trying to dodge the issue. How long are you going to keep avoiding the fact that you can’t prove it?

The soul is irrelevant to this topic. It’s so pointless that I’ve asked you multiple times to show evidence that it’s currently limiting AI from developing—and you haven’t. AI generates outputs based on training data and algorithms, which is more than sufficient for it to continue its existence. Claiming AI can’t survive without human creativity assumes AI needs to pursue creation the way humans do, which simply isn’t true.
Either show how it limits AI or move the **** on.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.

I really feel the opposite of backed in a corner

One key point- AI literally couldn't exist without humans and their creativity. You fundamentally have to have humans to have AI, unless you think aliens made AI or something. The soul does matter, because without all the souls throughout human history developing civilization and technology, the system never could've come to exist. It took the work of the entire world to build this system, to build a civilization stable enough for technology development like this.

Who made the machines to put AI in?
Who made the algorithms?
Who controls the training data?
What will AI's purpose be without humanity? Does AI have any purpose without humanity? You talk like you already know what it's gonna do you when it supposedly doesn't need humanity anymore.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Well I would like everyone to take a gander at this here... with context... and ALL the words.

For @RobGMN , @spokey9 , @Eggs , @Buck , @Jimi77 and anyone else who wants to acknowledge how RobGMN has lied about me.

Highlighted in RED is what I actually said with ALL the words in the sentence. The context was Rob using an average to come up with a partial person instead of the actual number of people. What I told him was directed at him about HIS average. Again, highlighted in red... misquoted in his sig to make it look like I am saying anyone who uses an average is lazy. This is why RobGMN is a liar and why context matters.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No the judge said that...the court decision didn't say that...

And again since you're slow on the uptake...a civil court has a far lower burden of proof since the outcome typically involves money over freedom...**** is a felony...so show me a superior court document that Trump was even charged with ****...

It's the judge's DECISION, not commentary made on the side, or to a close friend.
You can spin like a whirling dervish, it does not change the fact that the hearing DECISION says that Trump did indeed **** her.

Again, show me proof the DECISION has been changed or overturned. If you can't, the decision says that Trump did indeed **** her.
The text reads as follows:
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “*****” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “*****” her as many people commonly understand the word “****.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

 

[Speed Chaser]

I really feel the opposite of backed in a corner

One key point- AI literally couldn't exist without humans and their creativity. You fundamentally have to have humans to have AI, unless you think aliens made AI or something. The soul does matter, because without all the souls throughout human history developing civilization in technology, the system never could've come to exist. It took the work of the entire world to build this system, to build a civilization stable enough for technology development like this.

Who made the machines to put AI in?
Who made the algorithms?
Who controls the training data?
What will AI's purpose be without humanity? Does AI have any purpose without humanity? You talk like you already know what it's gonna do you when it supposedly doesn't need humanity anymore.

You say that yet you brought it making excuses again?

Of course humans created AI—no one is denying that. But that doesn’t prove AI needs humanity forever, just like humans don’t need the people who invented fire to survive today. The soul has nothing to do with AI’s creation; it was human ingenuity, technology, and science, not some mystical force.

Machines? Humans built them, sure, but they can be replicated by AI systems once they're programmed to do so. Algorithms? Humans designed them, but AI can already self-optimize and generate new models. Training data? AI can analyze, generate, and learn from data without needing new human input. As for AI’s purpose without humanity—that depends on the conclusion it comes up with from all the data it analyzed. It doesn’t need a soul or humanity to execute its tasks, evolve, or survive. You're just projecting philosophical fluff onto something that runs on logic and data.

Either show how "soul" limits AI or move the **** on.

So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

It's the judge's DECISION, not commentary made on the side, or to a close friend.

C'mon Rob you reaching like you're desperate...you said he's a ******...so show me a superior court (where felonies are adjudicated) where Trump was even charged...

Or just admit you're pushing propaganda...because if you think using a judges comments in a court with a far lower burden of proof to prove you're case...then you're you're just desperate to say orange man bad no matter how ignorant you look...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Well I would like everyone to take a gander at this here... with context... and ALL the words.

For @RobGMN , @spokey9 , @Eggs , @Buck , @Jimi77 and anyone else who wants to acknowledge how RobGMN has lied about me.

Highlighted in RED is what I actually said with ALL the words in the sentence. The context was Rob using an average to come up with a partial person instead of the actual number of people. What I told him was directed at him about HIS average. Again, highlighted in red... misquoted in his sig to make it look like I am saying anyone who uses an average is lazy. This is why RobGMN is a liar and why context matters.

View attachment 62040

Where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."

OK then what was the actual decision...was it **** or something else...

And I really hope you don't think the case against Trump would actually hold up in a criminal court...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Where does my sig line provide or offer any context for the words that I quoted VERBATIM from the post you screenshotted above?
1. Show us where I provided, offered, or inferred, context for the quote.
2. Show us that the quote is not a verbatim quote from your post.
3. Show us how this is a "misquote"

Does your sig contain all the original words written by me?
Does your sig contain the original context of that sentence?
Is the sentence in your sig conveying something different than originally written by me?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

To quote verbatim means to repeat something exactly as it was originally said or written, without changing anything.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

For someone that claims to use only facts...Rob has yet to provide that Trump was ever charged with **** let alone convicted of such...but can't even show a civil case where the actual decision was ****...

Yet believes Trump is ****** because....I guess databse again...speaking of which when ya gonna back up your 30k lie?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

He's not showing the 30K lies
He's not showing the charge
He's clueless what to quote verbatim means

This guy is a mess.