Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Speed Chaser" data-source="post: 8886200" data-attributes="member: 690887">You say that yet you brought it making excuses again?Of course humans created AI—no one is denying that. But that doesn’t prove AI needs humanity forever, just like humans don’t need the people who invented fire to survive today. The soul has nothing to do with AI’s creation; it was human ingenuity, technology, and science, not some mystical force.Machines? Humans built them, sure, but they can be replicated by AI systems once they&#039;re programmed to do so. Algorithms? Humans designed them, but AI can already self-optimize and generate new models. Training data? AI can analyze, generate, and learn from data without needing new human input. As for AI’s purpose without humanity—that depends on the conclusion it comes up with from all the data it analyzed. It doesn’t need a soul or humanity to execute its tasks, evolve, or survive.&nbsp; You&#039;re just projecting philosophical fluff onto something that runs on logic and data. Either show how &quot;soul&quot; limits AI or move the **** on.So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Speed Chaser, post: 8886200, member: 690887"] You say that yet you brought it making excuses again? Of course humans created AI—no one is denying that. But that doesn’t prove AI [I]needs[/I] humanity forever, just like humans don’t need the people who invented fire to survive today. The soul has nothing to do with AI’s creation; it was human ingenuity, technology, and science, not some mystical force. Machines? Humans built them, sure, but they can be replicated by AI systems once they're programmed to do so. Algorithms? Humans designed them, but AI can already self-optimize and generate new models. Training data? AI can analyze, generate, and learn from data without needing new human input. As for AI’s purpose without humanity—that depends on the conclusion it comes up with from all the data it analyzed. It doesn’t need a soul or humanity to execute its tasks, evolve, or survive. You're just projecting philosophical fluff onto something that runs on logic and data. Either show how "soul" limits AI or move the **** on. So once again, from the top: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? Come on, your elite awaits the next excuse you’ll use to avoid answering. [/QUOTE]

Verification