Current events discussion

Says the guy who still can't admit Trump lied, even after you look up the definition and then try to use it to spin away from the facts.
You just lied. You are attempting to deceive us by telling us the definition means something else.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is exactly what you have. You have your head so far up his ***, your brain is touching his cerebral cortex, and you think like him.
You are the guy who's life revolves around berating Trump on a car audio forum and you want to tell me I have TDS? Yeah, let's go with that. 🙄
So, WHO is paying the tariff on that bike I imported?
I told you once already. The actual importer. You just order the item so it can be imported. YOU ARE NOT THE IMPORTER JUST BECAUSE YOU ORDER IT ONLINE FROM CHINA. In fact, China holds MANY products that "come from China" right here in the United States. Already imported.
And tell me more about how Trump knew nothing of Project 2025, would have nothing to do with, and "banned" the people involved from being a part of his administration, then started appointing them immediately after the election.

“They've been told officially, legally, in every way, that we have nothing to do with Project 25. They know it, but they bring it up anyway. They bring up every single thing that you can bring up. Every one of them was false.”
A Truth Social post said he has “no idea who is behind” Project 2025


So far, he has appointed: Russ Vought, Stephen Miller, Karoline Leavitt, Brendan Carr, Tom Homan.
Project 25, what's that?
 
“They've been told officially, legally, in every way, that we have nothing to do with Project 25. They know it, but they bring it up anyway. They bring up every single thing that you can bring up. Every one of them was false.”
A Truth Social post said he has “no idea who is behind” Project 2025


So far, he has appointed: Russ Vought, Stephen Miller, Karoline Leavitt, Brendan Carr, Tom Homan.
Just because he nominated them doesn't mean he's for project 2025...obama went to a church where the pastor was antii-american and anti-white does that mean Obama hates the US and white people? It's the same principle you're arguing...
 
You just lied. You are attempting to deceive us by telling us the definition means something else.
Quoting the definition verbatim is "telling us the definition means something else"?
Have you graduated from Vodka into something much stronger, like hallucinogens?
You are the guy who's life revolves around berating Trump on a car audio forum and you want to tell me I have TDS? Yeah, let's go with that. 🙄
And yet you still can't admit that he lied 30,000 times while in or office. Or even ONCE.
Yet you'll lie and say that Biden broke the law in utilizing the SPR.
Deranged.
I told you once already. The actual importer. You just order the item so it can be imported. YOU ARE NOT THE IMPORTER JUST BECAUSE YOU ORDER IT ONLINE FROM CHINA. In fact, China holds MANY products that "come from China" right here in the United States. Already imported.
Incorrect, kid. If I buy even ONE item and then sell it, I am an importer.
Did I SAY I was buying a Chinese bike that was already in the US and out of customs? NOPE.
Work on your comprehension.

So when that $888 bike hits customs on its way here from China, WHO is paying the tariff?
Refer to 19 CFR for the correct answer.

Project 25, what's that?
The thing that Trump lied about when he said he knew nothing of it, or who was behind it.
 
Incorrect, kid. If I buy even ONE item and then sell it, I am an importer.
Did I SAY I was buying a Chinese bike that was already in the US and out of customs? NOPE.
Work on your comprehension.
The point of the tariff is to lower the demand of a good or goods from specific country...and most consumers change their spending habits as prices increase...whether it's not buying said good or goods or finding other finding products manufactured elsewhere to purchase...

so now that the Chinese e bike is more expensive...maybe one from Japan or US made are more attractive...or you just decide not to buy an e bike...
 
Last edited:
Quoting the definition verbatim is "telling us the definition means something else"?
Have you graduated from Vodka into something much stronger, like hallucinogens?
You can quote it all day long. That doesn't change the fact that you don't understand the definition. You are claiming you know Trumps intentions. You couldn't possibly know. Psychics aren't real.
And yet you still can't admit that he lied 30,000 times while in or office. Or even ONCE.
Yet you'll lie and say that Biden broke the law in utilizing the SPR.
Deranged.
Oh now you are changing it from you claiming he is lying about tariffs and China paying them to the 30,000+ alleged lies. Now you are also going to keep going in circles and bringing up past conversations. How many times now have you went back and pulled the SPR conversation out of your ***?
Incorrect, kid. If I buy even ONE item and then sell it, I am an importer.
Did I SAY I was buying a Chinese bike that was already in the US and out of customs? NOPE.
Work on your comprehension.
It doesn't matter. You are not the importer. You don't deal with the manufacturer of said bike you don't deal with the supplier of said bike. You're a consumer who put in an online order. You think you are some kind of special person who gets to bypass all the people involved with bringing foreign goods into the country?
So when that $888 bike hits customs on its way here from China, WHO is paying the tariff?
Refer to 19 CFR for the correct answer.
The actual importer.
The thing that Trump lied about when he said he knew nothing of it, or who was behind it.
Can you back that up with some proof or non biased facts or far left hate speech or left wing propaganda?
 
You are SO convinced that Trump would NEVER tell a lie, that you'll completely disregard the law, the Constitution, standard business practices, and real-world examples and proofs, just to say that he's telling the truth when he says foreign countries will pay his tariffs.

And you call ME biased.
Amazing.

Why would you pay a higher price if CHINA pays the tariff?
So now the retailer is ripping you off by charging you more for a fee they never incurred, but claim is part of their cost?

And WHO is paying the tariff on that bike I ordered? Does a manufacturer's rep fly here and cut the check for me when I get the bike at customs?
Rob,
We all admitted that Trump lies. YOU, however, refuse to point out the lies that Biden tells. I have asked you many times to do so, but you jump around it.

As for tariffs, Trump put higher tariffs on China and Biden kept the tariffs. If they were bad, then why not remove them?

I WILL SAY THIS ONE MORE TIME!!! LEARN HOW THE ECONOMY WORKS, AND YOU WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TARIFFS HELP THE COUNTRY!!! I'm fricking tired of explaining this stuff to you and you just toss it all aside because you're afraid to admit when someone is right.
 
Hydroponic tomato. Mexico. Pretty much flavorless.
If we can do it better, why aren't we?

View attachment 61685View attachment 61686

Empty claims are not proof.
Even Trump himself couldn't provide a shred of proof under a court order.

You want me to name a thing Kamala did that makes me upset? OK: She went too easy on Trump int he debate. She should have ripped him to shreds like a piranha, using everything bad about him AGAINST him.
Every tome he lied, she should have just shouted "liar" over his voice, the way he felt a need to talk over her.
She shoukd have campaigned 3x as hard as she did.

Good?
OK, now get off your chest what you want to say you disliked that she did.

WOW, you perform searched for a Republican, but not a Dmeocrat? What a tool!
Here's how it goes, old-timer: If you want to live in a glass house, don't be a fool and throw stones.
If you're gonna ***** about a judge donating TO the Democrat party, be REALLY ******* sure that other judges aren't getting donations FROM the Republican party.
Don't be a hypocrite.

"Pure accusations"? You're joking, right? Put down the KoolAid for two seconds, and watch this:

View attachment 61687

If ytou think a judge shouldn't donate to a party, then you think a judge shouldn't support a party. Voting for a member in a party is supporting a party.
So if judges shouldn't support a party, they shouldn't vote.

But you're comfortable with judges getting donations FROM a party. Right?

PACKING the court is adding judges to tilt the total in one's favor.
Stacking the court is making it partisan in one's favor so that the majority will rule as you want them to. Roe v wade was an example of a stacked court giving a decision the minority has wanted for years.
Two VERY different concepts.

Ahhhh, some honesty, "No more puppet libs".
Instead we get "puppet conservatives".
Which is good and fair in order to get majority rulings in SCOTUS, but "puppet libs" getting majority rulings in SCOTUS are bad and unfair.
Right?
Be careful, your hypocrisy is showing.

We are now going full circle. Instead of pointing out things the left does, you have to bring up issues the right does, without answering the question.

THAT is why you are a tool. Nice try for trying to pin me what I already pinned you as being.

ADMIT SOMETHING BAD THAT KAMALA AND BIDEN HAVE DONE. You can't do it can you? Does it hurt too bad to admit we said something right? Indeed, it does! We can all tell.
 
Hey Rob.
You never gave your personal thoughts on Joe giving Hunter an 11 year blanket pardon without mentioning any specifics. That means Hunter could have killed and sexually assaulted someone and the courts can't punish him for it.

What would you say if Trump did that to one of his family members under the same circumstances?
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,733
Views
448,655
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top