So creating good paying jobs and increasing the local, state, and federal tax income isn't a win?The tariff may have moved Honda manufacturing here, but it's not a US company.
That's only a partial win.
I said it's a PARTIAL win. We're not keeping all of the money here, which is the goal. Right?So creating good paying jobs and increasing the local, state, and federal tax income isn't a win?
If you read up on the process of rebuilding Japan and Germany, we did indeed make them better than us and provided them with a market for their products. And I don't mind it in that case because they're our allies. China is literally our enemy and they certainly aren't doing anything better, they're doing cheaper and shittier.The question is: why did we lose so many if we could simply just have done it better?
Why didn't we just do it better?
People complain that we helped other countries recover and then made them good enough to beat us.
No, we helped them REBUILD, and then they made themselves better than us.
Japan had Sony. We had Zenith for 20% cheaper. Sony won. Better.
Korea had Daewoo. We had RCA for the same price. Daewoo won. Better.
Japan had Datsun. We had AMC.
Did you know the dashboard on your Ford was probably designed 5 years before it could be approved for the vehicle design and cannot be changed once production starts, but the Japanese can react and change a design in a month if they choose to?
If we CAN do it better, we sure haven't made a show of it.
None of these big corporations are US companies, they're all international companies. And arrangement we have with Honda now is certainly better than before tariffs. If it makes you feel better to call that partial win, then feel free to do so. For the guy with a job at the Honda plant, it's complete win.Would you rather pay $25,000 + $6,000 in tariff fees for a Honda built in Saitama, or $25,000 with no tariff for the same Honda built here?
The tariff may have moved Honda manufacturing here, but it's not a US company.
That's only a partial win.
Somehow in the age of international corporations, it's a "partial" win. I guess Honda was supposed to shutter its operations in Japan and move to Texas.So creating good paying jobs and increasing the local, state, and federal tax income isn't a win?
What fantasy world do you live in. We may not access to the raw materials or may not want to access them for numerous reasons. In a world of tariffs, other countries are going us tariffs to limit US exports - ie, China.I said it's a PARTIAL win. We're not keeping all of the money here, which is the goal. Right?
Wouldn't it be better to have a US company sourcing materials in the US, manufacturing goods in the US, selling to US citizens, AND exporting to other countries?
I said it's a PARTIAL win. We're not keeping all of the money here, which is the goal. Right?
Wouldn't it be better to have a US company sourcing materials in the US, manufacturing goods in the US, selling to US citizens, AND exporting to other countries?
Yes, a "theory" is just an educated guess. It is based on possible evidence, but it leans heavily toward being a hypothetical conclusion.A theory is more than rational thought about what might have happened. Keep in mind that gaps in fossil evidence have been filled in just as the theory predicts.
Could there be other species and civilizations - absolutely. OTOH, what if Einstein is right and the speed of light is the absolute limit? Even assuming you could 10x the speed of light, it would be incredibly difficult for alien civilizations to find each other.
Just mathematically, when you look at just number of galaxies and numbers of stars, even if someone believes cellular life only comes from single cells slowly evolving into more complex organisms, life would have to be probable to happened else where in the universe, too.I get what you are saying. When you actually start diving into the evolution, scientists state there are huge gaps. They don't have actual specimens and/or evidence of all the different stages of evolution. They all state it is just a theory, and the definition of a theory is basically a rational thought, which means it is just something they believe to be true.
However, I totally agree that we have different opinions, and I respect that.
Now, for my real thoughts...
Earth is not the only planet with intelligent life. Man has only been on earth for approximately 200,000 years. Technology wise, we have only had it for about 100 years and look how far we have come. My thoughts are, there are other much older planets out there. If so, there can be civilizations that are at least twice as old as we are. Imagine the technology they would have. They would have the ability to travel to multiple galaxies, create life, and develop planets. So, who is God? He could be a leader of a civilization who created us. They have found numerous drawings of a man ascending to earth in some type of vessel. Some writings state he arrived in a chariot of fire.
Just like we emit body heat, we emit energy waves related to our consciousness and thought process. Some of that energy we emit from being can be sensed beyond our reality, basically, and it's a trait of intelligence across the entire universe, from what I understand. We're like little walking radio towers, our spines.A theory is more than rational thought about what might have happened. Keep in mind that gaps in fossil evidence have been filled in just as the theory predicts.
Could there be other species and civilizations - absolutely. OTOH, what if Einstein is right and the speed of light is the absolute limit? Even assuming you could 10x the speed of light, it would be incredibly difficult for alien civilizations to find each other.
That would be awesome...how do you figure reconcile that idea with dems pushing for $20-50hr minimum wage?Wouldn't it be better to have a US company sourcing materials in the US, manufacturing goods in the US, selling to US citizens, AND exporting to other countries?