Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am sure you are far more qualified to speak on either topic Rob the internet fact checker.
Lol, no. I leave it to things like court case decisions, anatomy textbooks and photos, etc.
You did actually.
You’ve claimed this before. Please provide an example to verify your belief.
I know you can't tell me how many times... because you are wrong.
Easy example. One of many:
1702241900792.png

It does but you will ignore it so you don't have to answer it.
Explain the correlation between someone "choosing to be a piece of shit" and using statistics and odds to shape opinions and alanyses.
See, you make false statement after false statement. I have never said every **** accusation is a lie.
Every time it got brought up, you turn to your excuse that women lie about it, and that it's false accusation since you didn't witness it.
We went through it and everyone knows your opinion on it.
Odd to a person who has no problem forming an opinion or conclusion without proof yet demands proof and facts from all others. Seriously, knock it off Rob.
Back to your playbook. Make claims you have no ability to prove whatsoever. Keep repeating them until peoeple beleive you of the topic changes.
They are based on your assumptions and lack of comprehension.
Yet another empty accusation. Assumption is what you do quite often. Case in point: Assuming the info about Loy Mauch was fabricated simply because he is Republican and you felt a need to defend him.
You can't comprehend quotes and how they work, and you assume anything bad that is made public about a Republican must be a lie or a fabrication.

But we've gone off on a lot of tangents. Lets stick to a topic of discussion and then move on.
First Amendement?
Private oil industry finding increased production to be too much of a "hassle"?
Your desire to eliminate a world economy?
Or one of the others?
 
Last edited:
Lol, no. I leave it to things like court case decisions, anatomy textbooks and photos, etc.
We all know your cover story.
You’ve claimed this before. Please provide an example to verify your belief.
YAWN.... I have Rob, you ignored it.
Easy example. One of many:
View attachment 55122
I called YOU a liberal Democrat. I did not say ALL Liberals are Democrats. Just picking trigger words again are ya Rob?
Explain the correlation between someone "choosing to be a piece of shit" and using statistics and odds to shape opinions and alanyses.
After you answer the question I will be happy to explain things to you.
Every time it got brought up, you turn to your excuse that women lie about it, and that it's false accusation since you didn't witness it.
We went through it and everyone knows your opinion on it.
Clearly not because you keep getting it wrong.
Back to your playbook. Make claims you have no ability to prove whatsoever. Keep repeating them until peoeple beleive you of the topic changes.
Ahhh part of your playbook. Accuse me of doing it before I call you out for doing it. Nice, predictable but nice.
Yet another empty accusation. Assumption is what you do quite often. Case in point: Assuming the info about Loy Mauch was fabricated simply because he is Republican and you felt a need to defend him.
You can't comprehend quotes and how they work, and you assume anything bad that is made public about a Republican must be a lie or a fabrication.
Really? So when I explained it to you, you ignored that too because you already formed an opinion based on your assumption. Wow, turns out I am right on about you.

How can I assume the info about Mauch was fabricated because he is a Republican if I don't know him or anything about him? Explain how you came to that conclusion.

I am sorry that I am that far passed you when it comes to forming opinions. I am afraid I need more than trigger words, partial quotes and incomplete post to form an opinion of someone. Some people are just higher up the evolutionary chain I guess.
But we've gone off on a lot of tangents. Lets stick to a topic of discussion and then move on.
First Amendement?
Why, you are clueless about it.
Private oil industry finding increased production to be too much of a "hassle"?
Your failure to comprehend sarcasm... sure, let us discuss it.
Your desire to eliminate a world economy?
Yeah, that was my point you extremest. <------- SARCASM.
Or one of the others?
How about a conversation between two adults using their brains to discus their thoughts, ideas and opinions? Or would you just rather post other peoples charts and graphs and speak on them as if you had a real clue about any of it?
 
Lol, no. I leave it to things like court case decisions, anatomy textbooks and photos, etc.

You’ve claimed this before. Please provide an example to verify your belief.

Easy example. One of many:
View attachment 55122

Explain the correlation between someone "choosing to be a piece of shit" and using statistics and odds to shape opinions and alanyses.

Every time it got brought up, you turn to your excuse that women lie about it, and that it's false accusation since you didn't witness it.
We went through it and everyone knows your opinion on it.

Back to your playbook. Make claims you have no ability to prove whatsoever. Keep repeating them until peoeple beleive you of the topic changes.

Yet another empty accusation. Assumption is what you do quite often. Case in point: Assuming the info about Loy Mauch was fabricated simply because he is Republican and you felt a need to defend him.
You can't comprehend quotes and how they work, and you assume anything bad that is made public about a Republican must be a lie or a fabrication.

But we've gone off on a lot of tangents. Lets stick to a topic of discussion and then move on.
First Amendement?
Private oil industry finding increased production to be too much of a "hassle"?
Your desire to eliminate a world economy?
Or one of the others?
IMG_4974.jpeg
 
We all know your cover story.

YAWN.... I have Rob, you ignored it.

I called YOU a liberal Democrat. I did not say ALL Liberals are Democrats. Just picking trigger words again are ya Rob?

After you answer the question I will be happy to explain things to you.

Clearly not because you keep getting it wrong.

Ahhh part of your playbook. Accuse me of doing it before I call you out for doing it. Nice, predictable but nice.

Really? So when I explained it to you, you ignored that too because you already formed an opinion based on your assumption. Wow, turns out I am right on about you.

How can I assume the info about Mauch was fabricated because he is a Republican if I don't know him or anything about him? Explain how you came to that conclusion.

I am sorry that I am that far passed you when it comes to forming opinions. I am afraid I need more than trigger words, partial quotes and incomplete post to form an opinion of someone. Some people are just higher up the evolutionary chain I guess.
Again, it's "far past". The fact you would make the same mistake after being corrected speaks vulumes.
Why, you are clueless about it.

Your failure to comprehend sarcasm... sure, let us discuss it.

Yeah, that was my point you extremest. <------- SARCASM.

How about a conversation between two adults using their brains to discus their thoughts, ideas and opinions? Or would you just rather post other peoples charts and graphs and speak on them as if you had a real clue about any of it?
I asked for focus on a singular topic/subject instead of all the tangents.
You want to discuss what you perceive as my "failure to comprehend sarcasm"? An odd topic since you really know nothing about me, nor can you provide any examples to prove your opinion.
That makes for a very short discussion: You state your opinion, I tell you it's wrong. Done.
 
You want to discuss what you perceive as my "failure to comprehend sarcasm"? An odd topic since you really know nothing about me, nor can you provide any examples to prove your opinion.
I can and have, you ignore them, we go in circles. I have grown tired now so I will bow out of this poor excuse for a conversation and let you have your internet trophy. Congrats. 🏆
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,100,876
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top