Nobody is making you take anything personal. That is a choice YOU are making on your own.
So if Buck insults my mother, I shouldn’t take it personally? FFS, you take it personally if someone points out one of Trump’s failures.
I’m pretty sure you’d take it personally if they talked about your mum. Unless of course, you value Trump more than her.
I mean civil, be an adult. If you can't handle a conversation on an internet forum without lashing out then you need to go do something else. There are ways to get your point across without being a diick to people. That includes telling everyone they are wrong, insulting their political choices, thinking you are king of facts and so on. Interact like an adult.
Once again, I’m the one who offered YOU the olive branch. You accepted and then almost immediately started in with the insults again.
Pretty disingenuous of you to post commentary on how others should be “civil” and act like an adult.
Be the example of your own desires. Before you post, check yourself for accuracy. Before you repost something, check it for accuracy. If you get challenged, support your argument with more than posting “go eat diicks”. Support it with facts and info.
Yes and your memory is suspect. When I decided to "revert" it was because you had reverted already yourself though you claim you did nothing wrong. I showed you what you said, the insult you made twice to me, so I responded in kind. There is no need to keep going in circles and reliving the same tired conversations over and over. They lead nowhere.
My memory is quite good. I’ve proved this time and again, even to the point of reminding you of things you posted that you later claimed not to have posted. Go back and review the agreement I offered. I said at the time my snipes were in response, and I would not snipe if you didn’t fire across my bow first.
It was short lived on your part, and I don’t turn the other cheek.
Yes, there is definitely redundancy in conversation here, but it seems it’s the unresolved ones that recur. And they end up in a circle of me asking people to prove their claim, then they go off on tangents, then I ask again, and they backpedal, and so on.
Eventually we’re pages deep and they’ve given no response for long enough that people forget what was even being discussed.
I guess we can avoid recurrence if things get resolved and closed out instead of people just arguing their beliefs as fact, and then devolving into insult hurling and other detritus until the topic changes.
If we want the thread to just be subjective, we could post nothing but unverifiable stuff such as whether you like donut shoppe coffee more than Highlander grogg.
If the thread is going to be people posting crap that can be verified, I’d say expect there to be contentious response when the crap is indeed crap.