Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess someone forgot that Trump is planning a run again in 2024.

Some people claim they like to forget the past because they find it irrelevant.
But it isn't.
Kind of obvious when Republidiots where all screaming about CLINTON getting impeached for lying about getting a hummer, and comparing it HEAVILY to Trump getting impeached for abuse of power.

Republidiots seem really against education and knowledge, but knowing history is pretty important when dealing with a person again.
Trump's history in government is utter shit.

Only a fvcking moron would think it's not relevant to the future.


As for the WHY? It's a question of BALANCE. Republidiots are STILL crying about that Canadian pipeline the got shut down by SCOTUS while Trump was in office.
Shut down because Trump's EO was not a legal one.
And they'd prefer it remain open despite Trump's screwup.

Yet here we are with a meme about Biden "breaking the law" (inaccurate, as the issue is about how the spending limits are to be set).

Hypocrisy.
What do you care if it's a meme or not? Does a meme make a truth untrue or a lie not a lie?
 

When you promise less gun restrictions, and then try (and fortunately fail) to add more than the previous 3 Democrat presidents.

1696435584333.png
 
What do you care if it's a meme or not? Does a meme make a truth untrue or a lie not a lie?
Well, I call it a meme because it's a meme.
If it was a YouTube video, I would call it a YouTube video.
If it was just text, I would refer to it as a claim (or somesuch).

Do you think I should call things something other than what they are?

Should I say "That video is incorrect" after he posts yet another false meme?
 
Last edited:
Well, I call it a meme because it's a meme.
If it was a YouTube video, I would call it a YouTube video.
If it was just text, I would refer to it as a claim (or somesuch).

Do you think I should call things something other than what they are?

Should I say "That video is incorrect" after he posts yet another false meme?
And just like normal the point flew way over your head. You must be tweaking from lack of arguments. All I did was ask simple questions and look at you. You are acting like you just got some free meth.
 
3 Terahertz is literally infrared emf radiation, which means 6g beams can cook you like the red light/infrared food heaters in restaurants:


300 GHz is where infrared starts. That’s 300 billion Hz, or like 300 billion light flickers per second. 3 THz is 3,000 billion:

IMG_2624.jpeg


Trust the science 🐍

They promise they won’t cook you, but only as long as your social credit score stays acceptably high enough.
 
Last edited:
3 Terahertz is literally infrared emf radiation, which means 6g beams can cook you like the red light/infrared food heaters in restaurants:


300 GHz is where infrared starts. That’s 300 billion Hz, or like 300 billion light flickers per second. 3 THz is 3,000 billion:

View attachment 53287

Trust the science 🐍

They promise they won’t cook you, but only as long as your social credit score stays acceptably high enough.
What kind of power does it have to be to cook me when the tower is a mile away?
Does it incinerate every living thing in its path?
Is it a 360 degree radiation pattern, or narrow beam?

Microwaves lose power dramatically with distance. The power at 2 feet is about 1/100th of what it is at ground zero.
 
What kind of power does it have to be to cook me when the tower is a mile away?
Does it incinerate every living thing in its path?
Is it a 360 degree radiation pattern, or narrow beam?

Microwaves lose power dramatically with distance. The power at 2 feet is about 1/100th of what it is at ground zero.
5g now is already beam-formed, which means it’s a shaped em field and not omnidirectional, and yes, you’re correct that higher frequencies do more rapidly lose energy as they travel vs low frequency waves.

I don’t know the other things you asked exactly, but 5g towers are being built everywhere, and they’re very close together so you don’t lose 5g cell service. 5g has a much shorter range than an old school regular radio wave. Why radio towers are so damn tall vs something like your WiFi router or a 5g phased array, which a phased array is how 5g is able to beamform, is because the low frequency radio tower must have an extremely long transmitter wire or coil in order to properly resonate and charge the longer wavelength within the transmitter device, as such we do with transmission lines and sound tuning for subs, in order to efficiently reproduce the waveform in the air/fabric of space.

You are literally surrounded by digital radiation devices, so, how much damage could 60,000 5g or 6g satellites in low earth orbit do as far as cooking you, like Starlink (SKYNET) is trying to be?

How much is your 5g phone cooking your *** right now?
 
Last edited:
5g now is already beam-formed, which means it’s a shaped em field and not omnidirectional, and yes, you’re correct that higher frequencies do more rapidly lose energy as they travel vs low frequency waves.

I don’t know the other things you asked exactly, but 5g towers are being built everywhere, and they’re very close together so you don’t lose 5g cell service. 5g has a much shorter range than an old school regular radio wave. Why radio towers are so damn tall vs something like your WiFi router or a 5g phased array, which a phased array is how 5g is able to beamform, is because the low frequency radio tower must have an extremely long transmitter wire or coil in order to properly resonate and charge the longer wavelength within the transmitter device, as such we do with transmission lines and sound tuning for subs, in order to efficiently reproduce the waveform in the air/fabric of space.

You are literally surrounded by digital radiation devices, so, how much damage could 60,000 5g or 6g satellites in low earth orbit do as far as cooking you, like Starlink (SKYNET) is trying to be?

How much is your 5g phone cooking your *** right now?
If they have to put in a ton of towers just to maintain service, then I suspect the energy falls off dramatically as distance is increased.

Given the sheer amount of electricity consumed just to power these 5G towers that can barely reach us (about 73,000KWh per month per tower), how big would a satellite have to be to fry us from 22,000 miles away?

Or, how many would there have to be to fry just one person from that distance, what power would they consume, and HOW would they be powered?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,095,574
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260513_214311575.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260513_213956814.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top