Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And yet you openly and boldly deny that medical texts, Federal Regulation, mathematical theory, are wrong, simply because you BELIEVE it.
Do you see the dichotomy there?

The difference is that when I read stuff or hear stuff, I DO understand, AND I can equate what is being said to other parts of life.
Like when a nuclear physicist starts explaining targeted radiation therapy to me, and I can immediately say "same concept they use when they make 3D images in glass by crossing lasers at specific X,Y,Z coordinates to microfracture the glass" and he says "exactly".
And if I DON'T understand and am interested, I make the effort to LEARN.

As opposed to you, who just continues to insist your beliefs override any facts that are out there because you "say so" or you "question" or "think outside the box".
I can provide multiple dozens of examples of you doing it, but if I did I am confident you would call them all lies and then spin off on some tangent like saying I eat diick or something.
FFS, I am STILL waiting for you to disprove bone innervation with more than hearsay or your personal belief. STILL.

Because that is what you do.
Not even close to correct. You have no idea what I know, what I think, what I do. All you have are assumptions based on your own view of the world through bigoted eyes and huge ego. You can keep waiting for me to disprove things to you or, if you really are interested in knowing about things and not just arguing with people to boost your ego you can go pay for an education yourself you loser.
 
One. Trump called it.
Two. Trump is not a detective.
Three. There are clues and traces all over the place
Four. Who's going to investigate it when everyone who could was/is against Trump or on the other side.

Sit there and tell me the whole of the government wasn't against Trump from day one when he was President. Go ahead. Many, many entities had common interest that converged and they all did what they needed to make sure Trump didn't get elected again.

Go on walking around with your eyes closed.
That's it. The entire federal gov't as well as numerous state govt's and election boards/commissions consisting of both GOP & DEM members all turned against Trump and covered up the biggest crime in the history of the country. Yet somehow Trump wad able to seize complete control of the GOP. Delusional....
 
That's it. The entire federal gov't as well as numerous state govt's and election boards/commissions consisting of both GOP & DEM members all turned against Trump and covered up the biggest crime in the history of the country. Yet somehow Trump wad able to seize complete control of the GOP. Delusional....
Does any of this crap matter? None of you would do anything about the fraud anyway. Like good old Rob there... all about being a rat and prosecuting what are probably mostly republicans on welfare in his eyes but is ok with voter fraud because it's insignificant.
 
Not even close to correct. You have no idea what I know, what I think, what I do. All you have are assumptions based on your own view of the world through bigoted eyes and huge ego. You can keep waiting for me to disprove things to you or, if you really are interested in knowing about things and not just arguing with people to boost your ego you can go pay for an education yourself you loser.
I know all three of those things because you post them here.
That is of course, unless you want to tell us that it’s simply all lies that you post about your opinions and beliefs.

As far as proving it disproving things, you set yourself up for the request when you make bullshit claims that you are unable to back up in the first place.
You then make it far worse when you double down and fight the facts with your “because I said so” defense, or even worse, your “the experts have it wrong” defense.
Yes, those are paraphrased.

Seriously, saying Grays Anatomy is wrong because it is old, even when current editions have the same info? Laughable.

I said before, and I’ll say it again: if you don’t want to be challenged on your bullshit, stop posting bullshit. Gain some knowledge on the things you want to speak about, and then speak about them.
 
Last edited:
Does any of this crap matter? None of you would do anything about the fraud anyway. Like good old Rob there... all about being a rat and prosecuting what are probably mostly republicans on welfare in his eyes but is ok with voter fraud because it's insignificant.
And there you go, spinning off on a tangent again.
Speak to the topic instead of whirling like a dervish every time you are challenged in a discussion to provide something beyond your beliefs.

Speak to the very legit idea presented, that the conspiracy would be so massive, it would require Trump’s own party to pull off.

Explain the plausibility.
 
Screenshot_20230928-174132_Brave.jpg
 
I know all three of those things because you post them here.
That is of course, unless you want to tell us that it’s simply all lies that you post about your opinions and beliefs.

As far as proving it disproving things, you set yourself up for the request when you make bullshit claims that you are unable to back up in the first place.
You then make it far worse when you double down and fight the facts with your “because I said so” defense, or even worse, your “the experts have it wrong” defense.
Yes, those are paraphrased.

Seriously, saying Grays Anatomy is wrong because it is old, even when current editions have the same info? Laughable.

I said before, and I’ll say it again: if you don’t want to be challenged on your bullshit, stop posting bullshit. Gain some knowledge on the things you want to speak about, and then speak about them.
Really, you are dictating my options? LOL
 
And there you go, spinning off on a tangent again.
Speak to the topic instead of whirling like a dervish every time you are challenged in a discussion to provide something beyond your beliefs.

Speak to the very legit idea presented, that the conspiracy would be so massive, it would require Trump’s own party to pull off.

Explain the plausibility.
Really? What's the tangent? Where do you assume I am taking the conversation? It is POINTLESS to talk to you about the voter fraud because you refuse to listen to anything that paints your boys in a bad light. So on that note why don't you just go ********* with a Unicorn?
 
Really, you are dictating my options? LOL
No, I am not doing anything with your options (whatever that means).

I am simply stating that when you post something, it says things about you that can be repeated.

I explained it at length a while using an analogy of driving a car vs. transporting it on a flatbed. That was when you expressed your belief that there was no fundamental difference between the two.

By stating said belief, you show us you have a limited understanding of the concept.
THAT is how I can say what you think, believe, opine, hope, etc.

Pretty basic stuff.
 
No, I am not doing anything with your options (whatever that means).

I am simply stating that when you post something, it says things about you that can be repeated.

I explained it at length a while using an analogy of driving a car vs. transporting it on a flatbed. That was when you expressed your belief that there was no fundamental difference between the two.

By stating said belief, you show us you have a limited understanding of the concept.
THAT is how I can say what you think, believe, opine, hope, etc.

Pretty basic stuff.
Who cares. Why aren't you gone yet?
 
Really? What's the tangent? Where do you assume I am taking the conversation? It is POINTLESS to talk to you about the voter fraud because you refuse to listen to anything that paints your boys in a bad light. So on that note why don't you just go ********* with a Unicorn?
You go off on the tangent of calling me a rat and making a weird claim about me thinking the people i prosecute are Republicans.
That tangent has NOTHING to do with the concept of massive voter fraud, and your claims and beliefs it is real in spite of a complete lack of evidence. And nothing to do with the truth that a fraud such as that would have to involve both the Democrat and the Republican parties.

So, can you skip all the tangents , backpedals, spins, and stick to responding to the topic at hand?
Maybe speak to the challenges addressed directly to you?
 
Last edited:
You go off on the tangent of calling me a rat and making a weird claim about me thinking the people i prosecute are Republicans.
That tangent has NOTHING to do with the concept of massive voter fraud, and your claims and beliefs it is real in spite of a complete lack of evidence. And nothing to do with the truth that a fraud such as that would have to involve both the Democrat and the Republican parties.

So, can you skip all the tangents , backpedals, spins, and stick to responding to the topic at hand?
Maybe speak to the challenges addressed directly to you?
I tied them together or did you not understand that when I said you were cool with prosecuting what you probably assume are republicans on welfare but that you are cool with some voter fraud as a little in your mind is insignificant. You prosecute fraud but are ok with fraud. Your life is an oxymoron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,094,325
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top